{"id":300573,"date":"2023-09-02T15:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-09-02T09:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300573"},"modified":"2023-09-15T10:34:43","modified_gmt":"2023-09-15T05:04:43","slug":"nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi<\/span>: A Division bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain, J., and Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member), dismissed the appeal due to the appellant’s failure to cure defects in a timely manner and insufficient justification for the delay in re-filing.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant preferred an appeal against an order dated 17-03-2021 passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) under Section 27<\/a> of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a>. The appeal was filed on 24-01-2022, but it faced multiple rejections due to defects pointed out by the Registry. The defects were first noticed on 01-02-2022, but despite several opportunities to rectify these defects, the appellant failed to do so in a timely manner.<\/p>\n

The appeal was re-filed again without curing the defects on 13-06-2022 and the memo of appeal was re-filed on 19-09-2022. On 10-10-2022, the Registrar of the Tribunal considered the delay in re-filing and decided to list the case before the bench to determine whether the delay should be condoned.<\/p>\n

The Appellant filed an application for condonation of delay, citing unforeseeable circumstances, including one of their counsels going into judicial custody, as the reason for the delay. On the other hand, the respondent opposed the application, arguing that the appellant had been negligent and there were multiple opportunities to rectify the defects.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT referred to V.R. Ashok Rao<\/i> v. TDT Copper Ltd.<\/i>, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 3516<\/a>, and clarified that the limitation for filing an appeal should not govern the period for curing defects in re-filing, and delay can be condoned with sufficient justification.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT, in the present case, found the appellant to be negligent in addressing the defects, and their reasons for the delay were not deemed sufficient.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT dismissed the application for condonation of delay and as a result, the appeal itself was dismissed.<\/p>\n

[People’s All India Anti-Corruption and Crime Prevention Society (IP) v. Usha International Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 596<\/a>, order dated 24-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Mr. Rohit Arora, Mr. Sahil Patel, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n

Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Anuj Shah, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1<\/p>\n

Shama Nargis, Dy. Director Pawan Reley, Akshay Lodhi, Simran Singh, Ashish Kr. Pandey, Gaurav Chaudhary, M M Sharma, Counsel for the CCI<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In application for condonation of delay in refiling of appeal, the applicant\/appellant has to give sufficient reason for not re-filing the appeal within the time prescribed.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[8991,2552,60693,60694,30182,22014],"class_list":["post-300573","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-appeal","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-defect-rectification","tag-insufficient-justification","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant due to delay in defect rectification and providing insufficient justification for delay\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant due to delay in defect rectification and providing insufficient justification for delay\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-02T09:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-15T05:04:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-02T09:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-15T05:04:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant due to delay in defect rectification and providing insufficient justification for delay\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay | SCC Blog","description":"NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant due to delay in defect rectification and providing insufficient justification for delay","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay","og_description":"NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant due to delay in defect rectification and providing insufficient justification for delay","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-02T09:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-15T05:04:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","name":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-02T09:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-15T05:04:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant due to delay in defect rectification and providing insufficient justification for delay","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":303449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/04\/tribunal-monthly-roundup-september-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300573,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup September 2023 | Top Stories on Estoppel by Election; compensation for lost property documents; ABC Bearings and Timken India amalgamation and more","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly rounup sep 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288833,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/nclt-section7-application-admitted-appeal-nclat-delay-beyond-45-days-lack-of-jurisdiction-ibc-section-61-precedent-scc-blog-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":300573,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT cannot condone delay beyond 15 days in appeal due to lack of jurisdiction even if fraud has been played","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal observed that as per S. 61(2) every appeal must be filed within 30 days before the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction to extend the period of 15 days if it is satisfied that there is a sufficient cause for not filing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305636,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":300573,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application","author":"Ritu","date":"October 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Limitation shall commence from the date when order is passed and shall not depend on the date when Appellant came to know of the order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/20\/period-of-limitation-for-appeals-starts-from-date-of-rectification-order-when-merged-with-original-order-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":300573,"position":3},"title":"Limitation period for appeals starts from date of Rectification Order when merged with Original Order: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT directed the Adjudicating Authority to hear and decide the application under Section 7 of the IBC expeditiously, treating it as not covered by Section 10A of the IBC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196696,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/application-under-section-7-of-ib-code-is-to-be-rejected-only-after-giving-opportunity-to-rectify-defect\/","url_meta":{"origin":300573,"position":4},"title":"Application under Section 7 of I&B Code is to be rejected only after giving opportunity to rectify defect","author":"Saba","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: Order of the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, was set aside by a two-member bench comprising of S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Bansi Lal Bhat, Judicial Member. The petitioners were financial creditors\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/16\/supreme-court-on-preferring-an-appeal-before-nclat-beyond-a-period-of-30-days\/","url_meta":{"origin":300573,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court on preferring an appeal before NCLAT beyond a period of 30 days: Read the Law [Explained]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of India: The Bench of M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., observed that, \u201cAppellate Tribunal has jurisdiction or power to condone the delay not exceeding 15 days from the completion of 30 days, the statutory period of limitation.\u201d Aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned order passed by the National\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300573","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300573"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300573\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}