{"id":300564,"date":"2023-09-02T12:00:35","date_gmt":"2023-09-02T06:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300564"},"modified":"2023-09-06T12:26:25","modified_gmt":"2023-09-06T06:56:25","slug":"delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: In a case wherein, the petitioner filed a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519685\">397<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519692\">401<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#39;) to set aside the impugned order dated 05-07-2018 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala Hose Courts, New Delhi under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#39;), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.*,<\/span> opined that insulting a woman, being rude to her, and not behaving in a chivalrous manner as she would have expected, would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman&#39;s modesty and set aside the order passed by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant case, the complainant filed a complaint against the petitioner on 31-01-2015, wherein she stated that she had been working with HDFC Life Insurance and the petitioner was her superior officer. The complainant alleged that, occasionally the petitioner used to assert his power and demanded money from her, which she had given on earlier occasions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, once on 31-01-2015, the petitioner demanded Rs. 1000 from the complainant, and she refused to give him the money. The petitioner further asked her to show the purse and when the complainant refused to do so, the petitioner called her &#8216;gandi aurat&#39; and started quarrelling with her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant also stated that she had given Rs. 4000 in the past to save her job and the accused had been harassing her since last six months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the FIR was registered and after the statement of complaint was recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\">164<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a>, the charge sheet was filed against the petitioner. Subsequently, the Trial Court vide order dated 05-07-2018, held that <i>prima facie<\/i> case was made out against the petitioner for an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court analyed Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> and opined that the provision delineates two pivotal components for stablishing an offence:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-left: 0.0mm;\">the presence of an intention to insult the modesty of a woman;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 0.0mm;\"> the manner in which this insult was perpetrated.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further relied on <i>State of Punjab<\/i> v. <i>Major Singh,<\/i> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=MTk2NiBTdXBwIFNDUiAyODYmJiYmJjQwJiYmJiZTZWFyY2hQYWdl\">AIR 1967  SC 63<\/a>,<i> Rupan Deol Bajaj<\/i> v. <i>Kanwar Pal Singh Gill<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDE5OTUpIDYgU0NDIDE5NCYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\">(1995) 6 SCC 194<\/a>, <i>Abhijeet J.K.<\/i> v. <i>State of Kerala,<\/i> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=MjAyMCBTQ0MgT25MaW5lIEtlciA3MDMmJiYmJjQwJiYmJiZTZWFyY2hQYWdl\">2020 SCC OnLine Ker 703<\/a> and <i>Swapna Barman<\/i> v. <i>Subir Das,<\/i> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMjQ1MzM3JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZzd2FwbmEgYmFybWFuIHYuIHN1YmlyIGRhcyYmJiYmQWxsV29yZHMmJiYmJmdTZWFyY2gmJiYmJmZhbHNl\">2003 SCC OnLine Gau 196<\/a> and opined that for the offence of outraging a woman&#39;s modesty, emotional response of the woman was not the determining factor, rather the accused&#39;s intent or awareness should be emphasized.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the since the Trial Court had based it&#39;s finding on the use of the word &#8216;gandi aurat&#39; against the complainant, therefore the word &#8216;gandi aurat&#39; had to be examined as to whether it had the potential to outrage the woman&#39;s modesty. The Court opined that what constituted an outrage to woman&#39;s modesty could be context specific as it depended on societal norms, cultural values, and individual perspectives. In the present case, the words &#8216;gandi aurat&#39; could mean different things to different people. Thus, the Courts would have to apply reasonable person&#39;s reaction to determine the impact and intent behind the words.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While reading the word &#8216;gandi aurat&#39; in background of overall circumstances of the case, the Court opined that the petitioner&#39;s action did not exhibit the level of intent or knowledge necessary to reasonably anticipate that the words would provoke such a strong and adverse emotional reaction that would as to qualify as an outrage to a woman&#8217;s modesty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that, depending on the facts and circumstances of each case, insulting a woman, being rude to her, and not behaving in a chivalrous manner as she would have expected, would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman&#39;s modesty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the gender-specific laws were not meant to be &#8220;anti-opposite gender&#8221; but rather addressed the unique issues faced by a particular gender. Further, the existence of gender-specific legislation did not empower the Court to relax the golden principle of availability of sufficiency of &#8216;material on record&#39; at the stage of framing of charge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\">509<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> did not inherently introduce a presumption in women&#39;s favour and it was essential for the Courts to apply the principles of charge and discharge objectively, without being unduly influenced by the fact that this provision was gender specific. The Court further stated that mere gender specificity of a legal provision did not automatically create a presumption in favour of that gender, unless such a presumption was explicitly articulated within the legislation itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the gender specific legislation existed to address the unique concerns of the society, but it did not mean that the judge&#39;s role was shifted towards a particular gender. The Court stated that judicial neutrality was an indispensable cornerstone of a legal system and the judge&#39;s role was to objectively interpret and apply the law free from any gender bias or predisposition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court noted that the Sexual Harassment Committee (&#8216;Committee&#39;) had already issued a warning to the petitioner for using derogatory language against the complainant and the Committee&#39;s verdict stood closed without being challenged by the petitioner. Thus, the Court opined that, even if the petitioner and complainant were having an argument with each other, the petitioner should have been more courteous and careful in using harsh language against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court set aside the order passed by the Trial Court and disposed of the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Varun Bhatia v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/E92DCz03\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 5288<\/a>, decided on 28-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: K.C. Mittal, Yugansh Mittal and Vaibhav Yadav, Advocates.;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondents: Manoj Pant, APP for the State; Ajit Kumar, Nutan Kumari, Nikita Sharma and Alok Kumar, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Irrespective of the gender-specific nature of a law, the judicial duty fundamentally requires unwavering neutrality and impartiality. The judge&#8217;s role is to objectively interpret and apply the law, free from any form of gender bias or predisposition.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[60689,2543,60691,60688,60690,60692,36335,52320],"class_list":["post-300564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-biased","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-gandi-aurat","tag-gender-specific-laws","tag-opposite-gender","tag-outraging-the-modesty-of-woman","tag-penal-code-1860","tag-section-509"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Gender-specific legislations are not biased against the opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi HC| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that insulting a woman and not behaving in a chivalrous manner would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman&#039;s modesty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that insulting a woman and not behaving in a chivalrous manner would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman&#039;s modesty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-02T06:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-06T06:56:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against the opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi HC| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-02T06:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-06T06:56:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court opined that insulting a woman and not behaving in a chivalrous manner would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman's modesty.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against the opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi HC| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court opined that insulting a woman and not behaving in a chivalrous manner would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman's modesty.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court opined that insulting a woman and not behaving in a chivalrous manner would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman's modesty.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-02T06:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-06T06:56:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/","name":"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against the opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi HC| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-02T06:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-06T06:56:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court opined that insulting a woman and not behaving in a chivalrous manner would not be covered under the definition of outraging the woman's modesty.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/delhi-hc-gender-specific-legislations-are-not-biased-against-the-opposite-gender-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gender-specific legislations are not biased against opposite gender, rather address unique issues faced by a particular gender: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":277309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/12\/womans-modesty-and-mans-nudity\/","url_meta":{"origin":300564,"position":0},"title":"Woman&#8217;s Modesty and Man&#8217;s Nudity","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shashwati Diksha*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;OP. ED.&quot;","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-240-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-240-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-240-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-240-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-240-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275370,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/mere-phrase-abused-me-in-a-very-filthy-language-does-not-suffice-required-to-prove-the-nature-of-abuses-to-make-a-case-under-s-509-ipc-delhi-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":300564,"position":1},"title":"Mere phrase \u2018abused me in a very filthy language\u2019 does not suffice; Required to prove the nature of abuses to make a case under S. 509 IPC: Delhi Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi: In a case wherein it is alleged that the accused committed the offence punishable under Section 509 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), as the accused started hurling abuses in a filthy language and started to quarrel with the complainant, Devanshu Sajlan, J., held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis Hazari Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-50-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-50-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-50-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-50-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-50-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/06\/delhi-high-court-issues-directions-regarding-hybrid-mode-hearings-in-delhi-district-courts-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":300564,"position":2},"title":"Delhi District Courts to permit appearances in hybrid mode without prior request; Delhi High Court issues directions","author":"Arunima","date":"June 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court vide Office Order No. 01\/RG\/DHC\/2023 dated 05-06-2023, has issued directions regarding Hybrid-hearing in Delhi District Courts. The directions are issued in partial modification of directions issued previously regarding hybrid hearing in Delhi District Courts, vide Office Order dated 11-05-2022. The directions to be strictly adhered to by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"hybrid hearings in delhi district courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/hybrid-hearings-in-delhi-district-courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/hybrid-hearings-in-delhi-district-courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/hybrid-hearings-in-delhi-district-courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/hybrid-hearings-in-delhi-district-courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332923,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/12\/referring-woman-prostitut-public-in-her-absence-may-not-constitute-offence-under-s-509-ipc-but-could-other-charges-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":300564,"position":3},"title":"Referring woman as &#8216;prostitute&#8217; in public in her absence may not constitute an offence under S. 509 IPC, but could attract other charges: Kerala HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court mentioned that the word \u201cintrude\u201d is not defined in IPC. Its dictionary meaning is to put oneself deliberately into a place or situation where one is unwelcome or uninvited. To put it otherwise, intrude means trespass, horn in, pry into or to join in something without invitation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321106,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/30\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-discharging-husband-and-his-family-of-cruelty-against-wife-who-was-police-officer-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":300564,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Unjustified perception that wife working as police officer can never be victim of domestic violence\u2019; Delhi HC sets aside order discharging husband and his family of cruelty","author":"Arushi","date":"April 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe essence of gender-neutrality must permeate through every line of a judgment, and a judge must cultivate thoughts that are inherently gender-neutral.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294874,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/11\/mapping-the-progression-of-lgbtq-rights-in-india-important-laws-and-judicial-pronouncements\/","url_meta":{"origin":300564,"position":5},"title":"Mapping the Progression of LGBTQ+ Rights in India- Important Laws and Judicial Pronouncements","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Tracing the development of LGBTQ+ rights in India with the help of statutory provisions and notable judgments by Supreme Court and High Courts.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"LGBTQ+ Rights in India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/LGBTQ-Rights-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/LGBTQ-Rights-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/LGBTQ-Rights-in-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/LGBTQ-Rights-in-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300564"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300564\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}