{"id":300539,"date":"2023-09-02T09:00:58","date_gmt":"2023-09-02T03:30:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300539"},"modified":"2023-09-15T10:38:08","modified_gmt":"2023-09-15T05:08:08","slug":"nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai:<\/span> In a matter related to ₹360 crore loan advanced by Hewlett Packard Enterprise India, an Indian subsidiary of American IT giant to a fellow subsidiary, a division bench comprising of M. Venugopal,*<\/span> J., and Mr. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), has upheld the ₹10 Lakh compounding fees imposed on the appellant by NCLT for non-compliance with Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant, Hewlett Packard Enterprise India (HPE India), advanced a ₹360 crore loan advanced in 2017 to a fellow subsidiary, Hewlett Packard Enterprise GlobalSoft Private Limited (HPEG). Both the HPE India and HPEG had a common non-executive, professional director at the time of advancement of loan, however, he later resigned from HPEG.<\/p>\n

The appellant its MD filed compounding applications to address any potential non-compliance with Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act<\/a> and contended that the loan was advanced without ill intent in the ordinary course of business and that it was promptly repaid.<\/p>\n

The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 20-12-2018, imposed ₹10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>. The Adjudicating Authority also imposed an additional ₹5 lakh compounding fee on appellant's Managing Director (MD), Som Prakash Satsangi.<\/p>\n

The Adjudicating Authority directed the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, to ensure compliance with its directives and dispose of the company petition. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the appellant preferred an appeal before the NCLAT challenging the same.<\/p>\n

Appellant's Contentions<\/p>\n

The appellant contended that they had inadvertently violated Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>, and had applied for voluntary compounding of this potential non-compliance, which occurred on 04-01-2017 and was rectified on 09-01-2018. It was claimed that they had stayed the operation of the impugned order by paying a sum of ₹5,00,000, as directed by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The appellant contended that the loan in question was disbursed at an arm’s length basis, in the ordinary course of business, at an interest rate not less than that declared by the Reserve Bank of India. It was contended that the two directors who were not part of the compounding application, should be prosecuted by the Registrar of Companies as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>. It was further contended that if the impugned order is not set aside, the appellant will face monetary loss and potential prosecution.<\/p>\n

Respondent's Contentions<\/p>\n

The respondent contended that the appellant company was in non-compliance regarding the loan, and the common director during the period of default had committed a violation of Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>. It was contended that the appellant company is liable for a fine of up to ₹25,00,000 as per Section 185(2)<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>, for the default committed during the relevant period. It was further contended that the appellant had admitted the breach and filed an application for compounding the offenses and therefore, had the opportunity to present their case before the tribunal.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

The central issues revolve around the imposition of compounding fees, the retrospective application of legal amendments, and the fairness of the NCLT’s order.<\/p>\n

NCLAT's Assessment<\/p>\n

The NCLAT observed that as per Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>, a loan can be granted to the interested concerns, only for the repayment of the loan, and not for any other reason.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT observed that there was a violation of Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a>, in relation to an inter-corporate loan and the appellant company, as well as its directors, are considered officers in default, and the law imposes penalties for such violations. The NCLAT observed that the appellant company had itself admitted the violation and filed an application for compounding the offense and this admission further strengthens the case against the appellant.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT rejected the appellant's contention that that the directors who were not part of the compounding application, should be prosecuted and the appellant company's MD ought not to be fined as he was not an “officer in default”.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT held that fine imposed by the Adjudicating Authority cannot be said to be excessive or exorbitant one. The NCLAT refused to interfere with the impugned order after taking into account the fact that the impugned order was passed while taking a lenient view despite the apparent default continuing for about 160 days.<\/p>\n

NCLAT's Verdict<\/p>\n

The NCLAT dismissed the present appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order which imposed ₹10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185<\/a> of the Companies Act, 2013<\/a> on the appellant.<\/p>\n

[Hewlett Packard Enterprise India (P) Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies, Bangalore, 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 594<\/a>, order dated 29-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by M. Venugopal<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Ms. Varuna Bhanrale, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n

Mr. Avinash Krishnan Ravi, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a matter concerning advancement of \u20b9360 crore loan by Hewlett Packard Enterprise India in violation of Section185 which only permit granting of loan for repayment of the loan and not for any other reason, the NCLT imposed \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[16651,60681,38453,30182,22014,30681,60680,58796],"class_list":["post-300539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-16651","tag-compounding-fees","tag-justice-m-venugopal","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-non-compliance","tag-section-185-of-the-companies-act","tag-shreesha-merla-technical-member"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT upholds imposition of \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-02T03:30:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-15T05:08:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT upholds imposition of \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-02T03:30:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-15T05:08:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"The NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT upholds imposition of \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 | SCC Blog","description":"The NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","og_description":"The NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-02T03:30:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-15T05:08:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","name":"NCLAT upholds imposition of \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-02T03:30:58+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-15T05:08:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"The NCLAT upholds NCLT's order imposing \u20b910 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":303449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/04\/tribunal-monthly-roundup-september-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300539,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup September 2023 | Top Stories on Estoppel by Election; compensation for lost property documents; ABC Bearings and Timken India amalgamation and more","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly rounup sep 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/irp-rp-cannot-seek-unpaid-fees-costs-members-corporate-debtor-insolvency-nclat-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300539,"position":1},"title":"In project wise insolvency, IRP\/RP cannot seek unpaid Fees\/Costs from members of CoCs of another project of Corporate Debtor: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the appellant has no Locus Standi to make claim for any unpaid Fees\/Costs from the members of the CoCs, as he is neither the RP in the project nor is connected with another project.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/08\/corporate-debtor-cannot-constitute-committee-of-creditors-with-a-single-operational-creditor-under-ibc-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":300539,"position":2},"title":"Corporate Debtor cannot constitute Committee of Creditors with a single Operational Creditor under IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that CIRP be closed with respect to the Corporate Debtor since not a single \u2018Claim' was received by the IRP even after the public announcement.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/14\/employees-provident-fund-gratuity-dues-even-if-funds-not-available-with-liquidator-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":300539,"position":3},"title":"Employees entitled to Provident Fund and Gratuity Fund dues even if funds not available with Liquidator: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that the Provident Fund and Gratuity dues of the appellant are to be paid in full.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300539,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup July 2023 | Top Stories on Illegal Sand Mining on Yamuna Bank; Mumbai Floods 2005; Tata Power; and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly july 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/26\/nclat-approval-rbi-asset-reconstruction-company-co-resolution-applicant-ibc-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300539,"position":5},"title":"Whether prior approval of RBI is required by an Asset Reconstruction Company for participating as Co-Resolution Applicant under IBC? NCLAT Answers","author":"Ritu","date":"June 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT observed that the principal objective of the IBC is \u2018revival of the Corporate Debtor and Resolution\u2019 and therefore \u201cLiquidation ought to be the last resort, keeping in view the scope and spirit of the Code.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300539\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}