{"id":300332,"date":"2023-08-29T18:00:38","date_gmt":"2023-08-29T12:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300332"},"modified":"2023-08-29T16:19:15","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T10:49:15","slug":"plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court: <\/span>A single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jay Sengupta,*<\/span> J., dismissed the petitioner&#8217;s application to quash the summons and directed the petitioner to cooperate with the Enforcement Directorate&#8217;s proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;It will be too much to ask the authorities to record reasons at every stage even while issuing summons in terms of Section 50 of the PMLA Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Brief Facts<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant matter involves an application under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\">Constitution of India<\/a> filed by the petitioner, seeking to quash an impugned summons dated 17-08-2023, issued by the Enforcement Directorate in relation. The petitioner also sought directions to prevent coercive measures against him regarding the summons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-left: 0.0mm;\">Whether the petitioner&#8217;s apprehension of coercive action is justified?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-left: 0.0mm;\">Is the petitioner obligated to comply with the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"List&nbsp;Paragraph\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 0.0mm;\">Whether the petitioner&#8217;s medical condition should impact the extent and nature of his cooperation?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#39; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner, not being an accused, argues against the necessity of attending the summons in person. It was contended that due to diverse ailments and the sale of the company of which he was a director, the petitioner is unable to produce the documents requested. It was further contended that most of the requested records are already with the Enforcement Directorate, and any additional documents have been disclosed in the writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Enforcement Directorate contended that the summons clearly requires the petitioner&#8217;s personal appearance, not just document production and the petitioner&#8217;s obligation extend beyond document submission as he is also required to provide evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#39;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court acknowledges the Enforcement Directorate&#8217;s authority to arrest but observed that this is not a directly relevant issue in this case. It was observed that the petitioner was summoned to both produce documents and provide evidence under Section 50 of the PMLA Act. The Court opined that if the petitioner cannot produce certain documents due to his change in company association, he can address this matter with the authorities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While acknowledging the petitioner&#8217;s health concerns, the Court held that there is no reason for the petitioner to be exempt from cooperating with the proceedings. The Court emphasizes that it is not necessary for authorities to provide reasons at every stage of issuing summons under Section 50 of the PMLA Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the petitioner&#8217;s apprehension of coercive action lacked merit, and no patent illegality in the summons issuance was established. Relying on <i>Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd.,<\/i> 2021 SCC Online 315, the Court opined that the exceptional relief of &#8216;no coercive action&#39; was not warranted in this case<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#39;s Verdict<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the Enforcement Directorate and appropriately respond to the summons. Considering the petitioner&#8217;s health condition, the Court directed that any interrogation should not exceed four hours in a day. The petitioner was directed to attend the Enforcement Directorate&#8217;s office on the same day at 2 PM.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The court concludes that the writ petition lacks merit and is consequently dismissed without costs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Pritimoy Chakraborty v. Union of India, W.P.A. 20644of 2023, order dated 25-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Jay Sengupta<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr.Adv, Mr. Subhankar Nag, Ms. Sayanti Sengupta, Mr. Jamiruddin Khan, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Arijit Chakrabarti, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Counsel for the Enforcement Directorate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. DSGI, Mr. Tirtha Pati Acharyya, Counsel for the Union of India<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court held that &#8220;no case is made out to seek the exceptional relief of &#8216;not to take coercive action&#39;.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,35276,35267,59915,60624],"class_list":["post-300332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-coercive-measures","tag-enforcement-directorate","tag-justice-jay-sengupta","tag-non-compliance-of-summon"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Plea against non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate dismissed: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-29T12:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Plea against non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate dismissed: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-29T12:30:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Plea against non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate dismissed: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate","og_description":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-29T12:30:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/","name":"Plea against non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate dismissed: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-29T12:30:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/plea-against-non-compliance-of-summon-issued-by-enforcement-directorate-dismissed-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea for no coercive measures for non-compliance of summon issued by Enforcement Directorate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241172,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/24\/ker-hc-mere-issuance-of-summon-under-s-502-of-pmla-2002-to-state-the-truth-or-make-statements-does-not-infringe-the-right-of-anyone-no-cause-of-action-arise-under-art-226\/","url_meta":{"origin":300332,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Mere issuance of summon under S. 50(2) of PMLA 2002, to state the truth or make statements does not infringe the right of anyone: No cause of action arise under Art. 226\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"December 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: V. G. Arun, J., dismissed the instant petition filed by the petitioner, the Additional Private Secretary to the Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to restrain the Enforcement Directorate (ED) from detaining the petitioner beyond reasonable time and to permit the presence of a legal practitioner during questioning.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":311757,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-directs-formation-of-sit-in-enforcement-directorate-officials-attack\/","url_meta":{"origin":300332,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court directs formation of SIT amidst allegations of bias and ineffectiveness in Enforcement Directorate officials attack case","author":"Ritu","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted the registration of a counter FIR before an FIR about the attacks on Enforcement Directorate officials, casting doubt on police impartiality.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/loc-against-rana-ayyub\/","url_meta":{"origin":300332,"position":2},"title":"LOC issued against Rana Ayyub: Infringement of Human Rights and restraint of her freedom of speech and expression? Read what Del HC says","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While expressing that a LOC is a coercive measure to make a person surrender, Chandra Dhari Singh, J., noting that the petitioner had appeared on each and every date before the Investigating Agency when summoned, quashed the LOC issued against Rana Ayyub. Petitioner approached the Court seeking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273226,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/07\/madras-high-court-senthil-balaji-enforcement-case-information-report-enforcement-directorate-complaint-case-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-summon-first-information-report-jurisdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":300332,"position":3},"title":"Whether Enforcement Case Information Report can proceed while proceedings pursuant to FIR stayed by Court? Madras High Court refrains ED to proceed against Senthil Balaji","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a case relating to a writ petition filed by Tamil Nadu electricity minister V. Senthil Balaji for issuance of a writ of certiorari, to call for the entire records in connection with the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213104,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/02\/madras-hc-pollachi-rape-case-court-refuses-to-quash-summon-issued-against-editor-of-nakkheeran-publications\/","url_meta":{"origin":300332,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC | Pollachi Rape Case | Court refuses to quash summons issued against Editor of Nakkheeran Publications","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., refused to quash the summons issued against Nakkheeran Gopal, Editor, Publisher and Printer of Nakkheeran Publications that unraveled the recent Pollachi serial sex scandal case. The Court, however, modified the summons. The summons was issued against him pursuant to 2 FIRs registered for various offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/calcutta-hc-referred-abhishek-banerjees-plea-against-cbi-ed-probe-to-the-chief-justice-teacher-recruitment-scam-case-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300332,"position":5},"title":"WB Teacher Recruitment Scam| Calcutta High Court refers TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee&#8217;s plea against CBI-ED probe to the Chief Justice after ED&#8217;s objection","author":"Ritu","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ED raised preliminary objection for this Court to hear out the matter as per the Supreme Court's order dated 28-04-2023 and the Assignment order dated 01-05-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300332"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300332\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}