{"id":300103,"date":"2023-08-26T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-08-26T06:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300103"},"modified":"2023-09-01T15:27:56","modified_gmt":"2023-09-01T09:57:56","slug":"non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> While admitting the appeal for further consideration, a Division bench comprising of T. S. Sivagnanam, CJ., and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J., prohibited the appellants from participating in any tenders within the State of West Bengal called by the government, quasi-government entities, or government-managed companies in West Bengal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the appellant aggrieved by the order dated 14-07-2033 passed by the single-judge bench of this Court which rejected the challenge made by the appellants against their blacklisting by the respondent corporation for a period of five years, preferred an appeal challenging the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants contended that an interim order dated 04-07-2023, had been granted during the pendency of the writ petition, and requested a similar interim order for the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent contended that the blacklisting of the appellants by Western Coalfields Limited had been upheld by the High Court at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, and subsequently affirmed by the Supreme Court. It was contended that the stigma of blacklisting will persist even after the completion of the blacklisting period, as per the conditions outlined in the notice inviting tender.<\/p>\n<p>The Court observed that the blacklisting of the appellants by Western Coalfields Limited will definitely constitute a stigma on the appellants. The Court&#8217;s prima facie view aligns with the respondents, suggesting that if the appellants failed to disclose the blacklisting order from Western Coalfields Limited, the five-year blacklisting would be justified. However, the Court considers this finding preliminary and reserves the final decision for the appeal hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>&#8220;The question would be as to whether if the period of blacklisting was over whether the stigma would vanish, in our prima facie view, the stigma will not vanish because the condition prescribed in the notice inviting tender is disclosure of any order of blacklisting.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court considered the prayers presented and held that the appellants would be prohibited from participating in any tender within the State of West Bengal that was called for by the Government, Quasi-Government, or Government Company managed by the Government of West Bengal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court admitted the appeal for further consideration and deliberation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dhansar Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. v. W.B. Mineral Development &#038; Trading Corporation Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/82dKtLH3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2440<\/a>, order dated 23-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Partha Sarathi Sengupta, Mr. Dwaipayan Basu Mallick, Ms. Amrita Panda, Mr. Arkaprava Sen, Mr. S. Sen, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Kishore Datta, Mr. Sanjay Saha, Mr. S. Bhattacharya, Mr. Piyush Agarwal, Ms. Utsha Dasgupta, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">While prohibiting the appellants from participating in tenders, the Calcutta High Court admitted the present appeal for further consideration and deliberation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[21082,2689,59371,60543,59104,3486,30974],"class_list":["post-300103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-blacklisting","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-chief-justice-t-s-sivagnanam","tag-government-tenders","tag-justice-hiranmay-bhattacharyya","tag-non-disclosure","tag-tenders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court is of prima facie view that non- disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court is of prima facie view that non- disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-26T06:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-01T09:57:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-26T06:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-01T09:57:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":428,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"blacklisting\",\"Calcutta High Court\",\"Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam\",\"Government tenders\",\"Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya\",\"non-disclosure\",\"tenders\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-26T06:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-01T09:57:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court is of prima facie view that non- disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/26\\\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court is of prima facie view that non- disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court","og_description":"Calcutta High Court is of prima facie view that non- disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-26T06:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-01T09:57:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court","datePublished":"2023-08-26T06:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-01T09:57:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/"},"wordCount":428,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","keywords":["blacklisting","Calcutta High Court","Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam","Government tenders","Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya","non-disclosure","tenders"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/","name":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-26T06:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-01T09:57:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court is of prima facie view that non- disclosure of previous blacklisting could justify five-year blacklisting.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/non-disclosure-previous-blacklisting-could-justify-five-year-blacklisting-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Non-disclosure of previous blacklisting justifies five-year blacklisting: Calcutta High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299080,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pre-mature-writ-petition-challenging-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":300103,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses premature writ petition challenging appointment of WBSCTVESD&#8217;s Chief Administrative Officer","author":"Ritu","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner challenged the appointment of the Chief Administrative Officer based on the absence of a notification number and approval details in the 2021 notification.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/19\/distribution-company-can-levy-delayed-payment-surcharge-on-payment-default-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":300103,"position":1},"title":"Distribution Company can levy Delayed Payment Surcharge under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 on payment default: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the liability to pay other charges (DPS) would arise not from the date when the bill was first raised but from the first instance of non-payment of the concerned charges,","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299010,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/calcutta-hc-directs-examination-safety-measures-prevent-entry-ragpickers-into-dumping-yards\/","url_meta":{"origin":300103,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court directs examination of safety measures to prevent entry of ragpickers into dumping yards","author":"Ritu","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court asked for a detailed report from the appropriate authorities on the steps to be taken to prevent the entry of ragpickers and ensure their safety.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296912,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/calcutta-hc-demands-response-from-sec-on-alleged-violence-after-declaration-wb-panchayat-election-2023-results\/","url_meta":{"origin":300103,"position":3},"title":"West Bengal Panchayat Election 2023: Calcutta High Court demands response from SEC on alleged violence in State after declaration of election results","author":"Ritu","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court is surprised to note that even after the declaration of the results, the State is not able to control the violence, which has erupted in several places.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298389,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/calcutta-hc-upholds-bpcls-decision-to-suspend-supplies-in-lpg-distributorship-amidst-partnership-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":300103,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds BPCL&#8217;s decision to suspend supplies in LPG distributorship amidst partnership dispute","author":"Ritu","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The changes made in the supplementary partnership deed without the previous approval of BPCL are violative of Clause 21 of the distributorship agreement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292368,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/know-thy-judge-chief-justice-calcutta-high-court-justice-ts-sivagnanam-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300103,"position":5},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice T.S. Sivagnanam &#8211; Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Tirunelveli Subbiah Sivagnanam was sworn in as the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court on 11-05-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court chief justice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300103\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}