{"id":300054,"date":"2023-08-25T16:00:23","date_gmt":"2023-08-25T10:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300054"},"modified":"2023-12-01T12:31:36","modified_gmt":"2023-12-01T07:01:36","slug":"husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Husband’s Live-in Partner not being a ‘relative’ cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Kerala High Court<\/span>: In a petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings under Section 498A<\/a> read with Section 34<\/a> of Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC') initiated at the instance of a wife against the live-in partner of her husband, K. Babu J. held that a girlfriend\/live-in partner not being a relative as per IPC<\/a> Section 498A<\/a> could not be prosecuted.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

The accused persons in the instant matter were the de facto complainant's husband, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and live-in partner. The marriage was solemnized on 31-01-2009 as per Hindu rites and customs. After their relationship got strained, the wife lodged the First Information Statement (‘FIS') alleging that she was subjected to cruelty by her husband and his relatives, including his live-in partner. The Police accordingly registered First Information Report (‘FIR') against the petitioner and other accused, conducted investigation and submitted a final report for offences punishable under Section 498-A r\/w Section 34 of IPC.<\/p>\n

Court's Scanner on Section 498A of IPC<\/p>\n

The Court admitted that the petitioner in the instant matter was not a relative of the accused husband, but only a woman with whom he has had romantic or sexual relationships outside the marriage. The Court scrutinized the provision under Section 498A of IPC and expressed that “The specific language of the Section and the Explanation thereof led to the conclusion that the word ‘relative’ would not include a woman with whom a man has had sexual relations outside of the marriage. By no stretch of imagination, a girlfriend or even a woman who maintains sexual relations with a man outside of marriage in an etymological sense would be a ‘relative’.”<\/p>\n

The Court emphasized the status within the purview of word ‘relative', which may either be conferred by blood, marriage or adoption. It further clarified with regard to the instant matter that in the absence of a marriage, the question of being a relative of another did not arise. The Court relied on U. Suvetha v. State, (2009) 6 SCC 757<\/a> and Vijeta Gajra v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2010) 11 SCC 618<\/a> and expressed that “S.498A, IPC being a penal provision, would deserve strict construction, and unless a contextual meaning is required to be given to the statute, the said statute has to be construed strictly.”<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court clarified that there was no scope for prosecution against the petitioner under Section 498A of IPC and quashed the FIR and final report filed against her.<\/p>\n

[Chandhini T.K. v. State of Kerala, 2023 SCC OnLine Ker 7965<\/a>, Order dated 3-08-2021<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For State: Public Prosecutor M.K. Pushpalatha<\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“By no stretch of imagination, a girlfriend or even a woman who maintains sexual relations with a man outside of marriage in an etymological sense would be a ‘relative’.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293587,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[56716,60534,56717,2523,12271,27214,44295],"class_list":["post-300054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-498a-ipc","tag-cruelty-by-husband","tag-ipc-498a","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-live-in-partner","tag-live-in-relationship","tag-section-498a"],"yoast_head":"\nLive-in Partner of husband not relative to be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC 498A: Kerala High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court recently clarified that a live-in partner was not a relative within the meaning of cruelty under IPC Section 498A.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Husband's Live-in Partner not being a 'relative' cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court recently clarified that a live-in partner was not a relative within the meaning of cruelty under IPC Section 498A.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-25T10:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-01T07:01:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Husband's Live-in Partner not being a 'relative' cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Live-in Partner of husband not relative to be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC 498A: Kerala High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-25T10:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-01T07:01:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court recently clarified that a live-in partner was not a relative within the meaning of cruelty under IPC Section 498A.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"kerala high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Husband’s Live-in Partner not being a ‘relative’ cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Live-in Partner of husband not relative to be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC 498A: Kerala High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Kerala High Court recently clarified that a live-in partner was not a relative within the meaning of cruelty under IPC Section 498A.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Husband's Live-in Partner not being a 'relative' cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court","og_description":"Kerala High Court recently clarified that a live-in partner was not a relative within the meaning of cruelty under IPC Section 498A.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-25T10:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-01T07:01:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Husband's Live-in Partner not being a 'relative' cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/","name":"Live-in Partner of husband not relative to be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC 498A: Kerala High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-25T10:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-01T07:01:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Kerala High Court recently clarified that a live-in partner was not a relative within the meaning of cruelty under IPC Section 498A.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"kerala high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/husband-live-in-partner-not-relative-prosecuted-for-cruelty-ipc-498-a-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Husband’s Live-in Partner not being a ‘relative’ cannot be prosecuted for cruelty under IPC Section 498A: Kerala High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":346818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/30\/husbands-girlfriend-not-relative-prosecution-under-s-498a-ipc-gujarat-hc-quashes-cruelty-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":300054,"position":0},"title":"Husband\u2019s girlfriend not a \u2018relative\u2019 for prosecution under S. 498A IPC\u2019; Gujarat HC quashes cruelty case","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petitioner was the alleged girlfriend of the complainant\u2019s husband, and no other status or relation had been assigned to her for prosecution under Section 498A of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/04\/day-to-day-bickering-between-husband-wife-not-cruelty-under-section-498a-of-the-ipc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":300054,"position":1},"title":"Day to day bickering between husband-wife does not amount to cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that there were latches on the part of the Trial Court in appreciation of evidence with regards to the alleged offence under Section 498A of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6501,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/25\/husband-s-extra-marital-relationship-does-not-amount-to-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":300054,"position":2},"title":"Husband\u2019s extra- marital relationship does not amount to cruelty","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the instant case, where the question arose that whether a husband\u2019s extra-marital affair amounts to cruelty under Section 498A of IPC, the Bench of Dipak Misra and S.J Mukhopadhayay, JJ., observed that\u00a0husband has developed some intimacy with another, during the subsistence of marriage and failed to discharge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/15\/section-498a-ipc-husbands-relatives-cannot-be-forced-to-undergo-trial-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-of-dowry-demand\/","url_meta":{"origin":300054,"position":3},"title":"Section 498A IPC| Husband\u2019s relatives cannot be forced to undergo trial in absence of specific allegations of dowry demand","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA criminal trial leading to an eventual acquittal also inflicts severe scars upon the accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/19\/section-498a-fir-against-husband-family-quashed-kar-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":300054,"position":4},"title":"“Section 498A IPC not panacea for all matrimonial ills”: Karnataka High Court quashes FIR against husband and his family","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"January 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMinor skirmishes that happens in the family between the husband and the wife are projected to become a crime for offences punishable under Section 498A of the IPC or even under Section 504 IPC\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"FIR Against husband family quashed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/FIR-Against-husband-family-quashed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/FIR-Against-husband-family-quashed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/FIR-Against-husband-family-quashed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/FIR-Against-husband-family-quashed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/14\/supreme-court-cruelty-498a-ipc-misuse-acquittal\/","url_meta":{"origin":300054,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court acquits husband in 498A IPC case, expresses concern over misuse of dowry and cruelty provisions","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The term \u201ccruelty\u201d is subject to rather cruel misuse by the parties, and cannot be established simpliciter without specific instances, to say the least. The tendency of roping these sections, without mentioning any specific dates, time or incident, weakens the case of the prosecutions, and casts serious suspicion on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Misuse of Section 498A IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Misuse-of-Section-498A-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300054\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}