{"id":299948,"date":"2023-08-24T12:00:12","date_gmt":"2023-08-24T06:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=299948"},"modified":"2023-08-29T17:10:08","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T11:40:08","slug":"absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> A single-judge bench comprising of Shampa Dutt (Paul),*<\/span> J., held that there is insufficient evidence to support the alleged offenses, and the complaint appeared absurd and improbable. The Court further held that there was no material on record to substantiate the allegations and no prima facie case against any of the petitioners. The Court allowed the revisional application and quashed the impugned proceeding and Charge Sheet.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioners sought the quashing of proceedings and Charge Sheet under Sections 341<\/a>\/323<\/a>\/506<\/a>\/34<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC).<\/p>\n

The petitioners’ case was that petitioner 2, along with his mother, had purchased land in Chaitanyapur, West Bengal. The dispute arose when petitioner 2 attempted to install a boundary fence on the land on 13-02-2018. The opposite party-accused and others obstructed this action and demanded a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 as payment. The petitioner 2 was threatened with harm, leading him to pay Rs. 1,00,000 out of fear. Subsequently, due to non-payment of the remaining amount, on 11.03.2018, petitioner no. 2 was allegedly attacked by the opposite party-accused and others while planting trees on the land. This attack resulted in serious injuries and the loss of personal belongings, including a mobile phone, gold chain, and Rs. 2130. The attackers reportedly forced petitioner 2 to sign a blank paper and subjected him to further physical abuse.<\/p>\n

The petitioners contended that despite lodging a general diary and later a complaint under Section 156(3)<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>., the police did not take proper action against the accused. Instead, the police allegedly advised the accused to file a false written complaint against the petitioners which led to the initiation of multiple cases, including against the petitioners and against the private opposite party and associates.<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/p>\n

The petitioners’ counsel argued that the proceedings against the petitioners were maliciously instituted and lacked prima facie evidence. On the other hand, the state’s counsel presented the case diary but the injury report had limited information.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the proceeding against the petitioners should be quashed due to its alleged false and fabricated nature.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether there is prima facie evidence to support the allegations against the petitioners.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Court’s Observation and Verdict<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that there is an absence of substantial evidence, including medical documentation and case diary entries, to substantiate the alleged offences and injuries. The Court further observed that the complaint seemed absurd and inherently improbable, lacking a basis for a prudent person to conclude that there were sufficient grounds for proceeding against the petitioners. The Court found that the criminal proceeding against the petitioners appeared to be maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive.<\/p>\n

    “The complaint is so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient grounds for proceeding against the petitioners.”<\/p>\n

    The Court held that the criminal proceeding against the petitioners seemed to be maliciously instituted and allowed the revision application. The Court quashed the impugned proceeding and Charge Sheet and disposed of all connected applications.<\/p>\n

    [Panchanan Ghorai v. State of W.B., 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2434<\/a>, order dated 22-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    Mr. Prokash Chandra Mondal and Mr. Debabrata Mondal, Counsel for the Petitioners;<\/p>\n

    Mr. Md. Kutubuddin, Counsel for the Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

    Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

    \"penal<\/a><\/p>\n

    Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

    \"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    While quashing the criminal proceeding filed against petitioners, the Calcutta High Court held that the same is lacking with substantial evidence and is institutes with malicious intent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[60504,2689,30517,60505,59921,13001,60503],"class_list":["post-299948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-absurd-complaint","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-criminal-proceeding","tag-improbable-complaint","tag-justice-shampa-dutt-paul","tag-quashment","tag-sufficient-ground-for-legal-action"],"yoast_head":"\nAbsurd and improbable complaint, failed to establish sufficient grounds for legal action: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court deems the complaint absurd and improbable and held that the same failed to establish sufficient ground for legal action.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court deems the complaint absurd and improbable and held that the same failed to establish sufficient ground for legal action.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-24T06:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-29T11:40:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Absurd and improbable complaint, failed to establish sufficient grounds for legal action: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-24T06:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-29T11:40:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court deems the complaint absurd and improbable and held that the same failed to establish sufficient ground for legal action.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Absurd and improbable complaint, failed to establish sufficient grounds for legal action: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court deems the complaint absurd and improbable and held that the same failed to establish sufficient ground for legal action.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action","og_description":"Calcutta High Court deems the complaint absurd and improbable and held that the same failed to establish sufficient ground for legal action.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-24T06:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-29T11:40:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","name":"Absurd and improbable complaint, failed to establish sufficient grounds for legal action: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-24T06:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-29T11:40:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court deems the complaint absurd and improbable and held that the same failed to establish sufficient ground for legal action.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/wife-leaving-matrimonial-house-with-traditional-marriage-ornaments-cannot-form-basis-for-criminal-case-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":299948,"position":0},"title":"Wife leaving matrimonial house with traditional marriage ornaments cannot form basis for criminal case: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceeding pending before the Judicial Magistrate and all related orders.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/wife-infertility-husband-mutual-divorce-fir-cruelty-calcutta-high-court-revision-petition-quash-fir-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":299948,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Infertility cannot be a ground for divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the revision petition filed for quashing of FIR and criminal proceeding against the petitioner\/husband, the Court held that prima facie case of a cognizable offence of cruelty can be make out against the petitioner\/husband therefore inherit power of High Court under S. 482 CrPC cannot be exercised.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":302113,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/22\/quashing-of-abetment-of-suicide-result-miscarriage-of-justice-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":299948,"position":2},"title":"Abetment of Suicide| Quashing would result in miscarriage of justice as prima facie evidence supports trial: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the victim was a minor on the date of the alleged suicide, which prima facie invoked Section 305 of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/calcutta-hc-refuses-to-quash-proceeding-against-teacher-for-involvement-in-communal-disturbance-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":299948,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court refuses to quash proceeding against teacher for involvement in Communal Disturbance case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Considering the nature of the alleged offences and the available evidence, the Calcutta High Court found a prima facie case against the petitioner to proceed to trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-revision-seeking-cancellation-of-bail-in-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":299948,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision seeking cancellation of bail in assault case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticized the trial court for solely relying on party's submissions and not calling for injury report.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/calcutta-hc-quashes-complaint-under-section-498a-of-the-ipc-on-lack-of-specific-allegations-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":299948,"position":5},"title":"WhatsApp messages depict normal relationship between daughter-in-law and in-laws; Calcutta High Court quashes Section 498A IPC complaint","author":"Ritu","date":"September 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court cited various cases where the Supreme Court has expressed concern over the misuse of Section 498A of the IPC in matrimonial disputes.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=299948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299948\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=299948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=299948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=299948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}