{"id":299860,"date":"2023-08-23T12:00:06","date_gmt":"2023-08-23T06:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=299860"},"modified":"2023-08-28T14:08:38","modified_gmt":"2023-08-28T08:38:38","slug":"bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a case involving tug of war among adoptive parents and biological parents disputing over custody of a 2-year-old, Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. quashed and set aside dismissal orders against adoption petition and directed the Trial Court to decide validity of adoption and retained custody of the child with the adoptive parents until disposal of the said matter by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The adoptive parents claimed that the biological parents had given the child in adoption through an adoption deed dated 16-07-2021 bearing signatures and photographs of both adoptive and biological parents in the absence of any witnesses, which was disputed by the biological parents. An adoption petition was preferred on 18-09-2021 which was rejected through order dated 16-03-2022, and review against the same was also rejected on 8-03-2023 and the City Civil Court directed handing over the custody of minor child to the biological parents. It was observed that consent of both father and mother was required to give their child in adoption as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001573331\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">9<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808784\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956<\/a> (&#8216;HAMA&#8217;) and that the adoption deed was not registered as per Section 16 in the absence of any recital regarding &#8220;giving and taking&#8221; of the child in adoption deed. The said orders were challenged in the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The adoption petition was opposed by the child&#8217;s biological father in March 2018, stating that the biological parents got pregnant after a love relationship, who lost their jobs during pandemic and incurred some financial problems. The biological parents came in contact with someone (&#8216;A&#8217;) after they decided to keep the child in the institution or for adoption. The child was born on 14-07-2021 and &#8216;A&#8217; took them along with their child to get certain documents executed without reading, explaining and understanding the consequences. The biological parents contended that after discussion with their families, they decided to take their son back and sought rejection of the said adoption petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court perused the general provisions regarding adoption of a child and pointed out that the photographs on record indicated biological parents&#8217; marriage as per Hindu rituals for considering provisions of Hindu Law in the context of adoption.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court expressed that &#8220;Considering the provisions of Section 4 as Chapter II of HAMA codifies the provisions as regards adoptions, in the absence of any provision to the contrary, in my opinion, it is the provisions of Chapter II of HAMA which will govern the adoption and not the text of Hindu Law.&#8221; The Court further highlighted provisions under Section 5 providing for regulation of adoption, Section 6 on requisites of a valid adoption, Section 9 specifying persons capable of giving in adoption, additional conditions for a valid adoption under Section 11, effects of adoption as per Section 12, non-cancellation of a valid adoption under Section 15, and presumption as to registered documents relating to adoption.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court clarified that the question arising in the instant matter was &#8220;whether the child was actually given and taken in adoption with intent to transfer the child from one family to the other&#8221; since the capability of parties was not disputed. The Court also cited provisions related to adoption and establishment of Child Welfare Committee under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015<\/a> (&#8216;JJ Act&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the first dismissal order against the adoption petition, the Court scrutinized the requirements of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001573331\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">9<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808784\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HAMA<\/a>. The Court observed that &#8220;despite there being no requirement of seeking permission of the Court, the adoption petition has been filed in the City Civil Court probably for seeking imprimatur of the Court to the adoption which was opposed by the biological parents and was adjudicated by the said Court.&#8221; It further negated the petitioners&#8217; contention that the biological parents were co-petitioners in the said petition, saying that the same was not reflected from the said petition and that it was the affidavit-in-reply objecting the order being passed that the written reply was filed in which curiously the cause title was changed showing the biological parents as co-petitioners. It further questioned the City Civil Court&#8217;s requirements for the petitioners to produce a consent affidavit for their 7-year-old minor daughter, who was not competent to consent but whose consenting affidavit was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was pointed out that &#8220;The requirements of Section 11 of HAMA prescribing the conditions for valid adoption and Section 15 of HAMA which provides that valid adoption cannot be cancelled was not brought to the notice of the Trial Court. The trial Court considered the provisions of Section 9(1) of HAMA and rejected the petition by holding that consent of both father and mother is required.&#8221; The Court viewed that there was no necessity of filing an adoption petition since the provisions of Section 9(4) of HAMA were not applicable. The Court suggested that the appropriate course would have been to direct the parties to file substantive suits so that the matter could be adjudicated by leading evidence to establish that the conditions of valid adoption were satisfied. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Param Pal Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">National Insurance Co.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/B61myeC1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2013) 3 SCC 409<\/a> wherein, the Court considered adoption provisions with reference to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Lakshman Singh Kothari<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rup Kanwar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/bgN47Q8H\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1962) 1 SCR 477<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M. Gurudas<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rasaranjan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wp9344oi\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2006) 8 SCC 367.<\/a> The Court in the said decision observed that &#8220;no particular form is prescribed but the law requires that the natural parent shall hand over the adoptive boy and the adoptive parent shall receive him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding City Civil Court dismissing the adoption petition, the Court reiterated the requirement of substantive suit, and highlighted that adoption deed was not listed in the documents required to be compulsorily registered as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534783\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">17<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829235\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indian Registration Act, 1908<\/a>. The Court questioned the summary manner of deciding the said matter and handing over of child by the biological parents to a third person. It stated that &#8220;In wake of the dispute being raised as regards the actual giving and taking of the child with intent to transfer the child from one family to another, evidence was required to be led.&#8221; The Court further observed regarding presumption of adoption that &#8220;as the deed of adoption is not registered, the condition precedent for statutory presumption to be raised is not satisfied and as such without evidence being led, there can be no presumption relating to adoption as regards the unregistered deed of adoption.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found the order dated 16-03-2022 unsustainable, further stating that the Short Cause Suit by adoptive parents seeking declaration of validity of adoption could not conclude adoption in favour of adoptive parents. The Court observed that the City Civil Court failed to appreciate that the adoption petition was dismissed in a summary manner without giving any opportunity to the parents to lead any evidence and the matter was decided on the basis of affidavits. The Court pointed towards the government orders reflecting that it was not mandatory to register adoption deeds.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision of the Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court quashed and set aside the impugned orders dated 16-03-2022 and 8-03-2023 but restricted the conclusion of adoption in favour of the adoptive parents. The Court directed the Trial Court to decide Short Cause Suit expeditiously within 6 months. The Court further allowed the child to remain with the adoptive parents till the final adjudication of the said suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. Y, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7d173257\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Bom 1721<\/a>, decided on 19-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this matter<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Advocate Sneha Phense. Advocate Savita Sawalkar, Advocate Gunjan Tamhane<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Advocate Edith Dey<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The biological parents first decided to give their child in adoption due to the financial crisis during COVID-19 pandemic but decided to take their son back after discussion with their respective families.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[55277,45797,45796,2569,13191,60483],"class_list":["post-299860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adoption-laws","tag-adoptive-parents","tag-biological-parents","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-child-custody","tag-hama"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC quashes order for custody of a child to biological parents; directs deciding validity of adoption | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court directed retention of child custody with adoptive parents and directed Trial Court to decide expeditiously on validity of adoption.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court directed retention of child custody with adoptive parents and directed Trial Court to decide expeditiously on validity of adoption.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-23T06:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-28T08:38:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC quashes order for custody of a child to biological parents; directs deciding validity of adoption | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-23T06:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-28T08:38:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court directed retention of child custody with adoptive parents and directed Trial Court to decide expeditiously on validity of adoption.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"bombay high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC quashes order for custody of a child to biological parents; directs deciding validity of adoption | SCC Blog","description":"Bombay High Court directed retention of child custody with adoptive parents and directed Trial Court to decide expeditiously on validity of adoption.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption","og_description":"Bombay High Court directed retention of child custody with adoptive parents and directed Trial Court to decide expeditiously on validity of adoption.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-23T06:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-28T08:38:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/","name":"Bombay HC quashes order for custody of a child to biological parents; directs deciding validity of adoption | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-23T06:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-28T08:38:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Bombay High Court directed retention of child custody with adoptive parents and directed Trial Court to decide expeditiously on validity of adoption.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"bombay high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-child-custody-biological-parents-directs-deciding-validity-adoption\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court sets aside order for custody of a minor child back to biological parents; directs Trial Court to decide validity of adoption"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/13\/karnataka-high-court-legal-validity-unregistered-adoption-agreement-unborn-child-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":299860,"position":0},"title":"What is the legal validity of an unregistered agreement for adoption entered between biological parents of an unborn child and the adoptive parents? Karnataka HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"December 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"A curious case presented itself before the Karnataka HC wherein they deliberated over an agreement for adoption entered between the biological parents and adoptive parents, when the child was still unborn.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-424.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294723,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/single-working-women-can-adopt-a-child-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":299860,"position":1},"title":"JJ Act recognises a Single Parent to be eligible for being an Adoptive Parent; Bombay High Court allows single working women to Adopt a Child","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that the comparison done by the Competent Court between the biological mother being a housewife and the prospective adoptive mother (single parent) being a working lady reflects a mindset of the medieval conservative concepts of a family.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/04\/bom-hc-adopted-child-entitled-to-caste-of-adoptive-parents\/","url_meta":{"origin":299860,"position":2},"title":"Adopted child entitled to caste status of adoptive parents when biological parents unknown: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the process of adoption is completed, the adopted child becomes the legitimate child of the parents and all rights, privileges and responsibilities are bestowed on him which are attached to that relationship.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"caste of adopted child","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/caste-of-adopted-child.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/caste-of-adopted-child.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/caste-of-adopted-child.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/caste-of-adopted-child.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":45723,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/04\/us-couple-allowed-to-adopt-abandoned-siblings\/","url_meta":{"origin":299860,"position":3},"title":"US couple allowed to adopt abandoned siblings","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Deciding on a foreign adoption petition filed by the petitioners for the adoption of two minors, the bench of of G.S. Patel, J., agreed to give the custody of children to the foreign adoptive parents and not the biological mother due to her indifferent behaviour towards the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/17\/madras-hc-adoption-does-not-sever-relationship-of-child-with-biological-father-unless-he-renounces-his-right-as-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":299860,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC | Adoption does not sever relationship of child with biological father unless he renounces his right as father","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0P.T. Asha, J., addressed a matter in relation to adoption and modification in the birth certificate of a minor in terms of change in the name of the biological father of the child. Legal status of a biological daughter Petitioners are the adopted father and biological\/natural mother of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":262321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/24\/adoptive-father-of-a-minor-girl-seeks-issuance-of-her-passport-with-details-of-adoptive-parents-so-that-she-could-write-her-toefl-examination\/","url_meta":{"origin":299860,"position":5},"title":"Adoptive Father of a minor girl seeks issuance of her passport with details of adoptive parents so that she could write her TOEFL examination: Here\u2019s what Del HC directed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: V. Kameswar Rao, J., addressed a matter wherein a minor child was not able to apply for a passport either in the name of her biological parents or in the name of her adoptive parents, was unable to pursue her academics in the USA. A petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=299860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299860\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=299860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=299860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=299860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}