{"id":299810,"date":"2023-08-22T16:00:21","date_gmt":"2023-08-22T10:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=299810"},"modified":"2023-08-25T15:12:51","modified_gmt":"2023-08-25T09:42:51","slug":"andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","title":{"rendered":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Andhra Pradesh High Court<\/span>: In a case wherein, the writ petition was filed by the petitioner to challenge the order passed by Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (&#8216;the Tribunal&#39;), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ravi Nath Tilhari*<\/span>, K. Manmadha Rao, JJ., opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner married her late husband on 9-6-1975 as per Christian rites and customs. The late husband of the petitioner worked as warden in the office of District Social Welfare, Respondent 3 and he retired on 30-06-2011 and later expired on 17-10-2014, leaving behind the petitioner as his legally wedded wife and a son as his legal heirs. The petitioner approached Respondents 1-4 to claim the retirement and other terminal benefits and came to know that the Respondent 5, being nominee of the late husband of the petitioner, was also claiming family pension.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The late husband of the petitioner filed a case seeking divorce against the petitioner and during its pendency, he died which resulted into the dismissal of the case. Even in divorce petition, any marriage with Respondent 5 was not mentioned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that she was the only legally wedded wife and only widow entitled to receive all the service benefits on the death of her husband. The petitioner&#39;s husband also never obtained any permission from the competent authority in the service department, for the alleged second marriage with the Respondent 5 at any time as per the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 (&#8216;1964 Rules&#39;). Thus, the petitioner contended that the second marriage was null and void and Respondent 5 did not acquire any status of wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner filed an application before the Tribunal and questioned the inaction of the Respondent 1-4, with direction to release the pending and all other benefits and amounts payable to the petitioner due to death of her husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Tribunal placed reliance on the Rule 50 of Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980 (&#8216;1980 Rules&#39;) and opined that both the petitioner and Respondent 5 was entitled for the family pension and retirement benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioner filed the writ petition to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <i>Vidhyadhari<\/i> v. <i>Sukhrana Bai<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDQxMDg0JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZ2aWRoeWFkaGFyaSB2LiBzdWtocmFuYSBiYWkmJiYmJkFsbFdvcmRzJiYmJiZnU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmYWxzZQ==\">(2008) 2 SCC 238<\/a> and <i>Tulsa Devi Nirola<\/i> v. <i>Radha Nirola<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAwNDI3Nzc1JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZ0cnVlJiYmJiZ0dWxzYSBkZXZpIG5pcm9sYSB2LiByYWRoYSBuaXJvbGEmJiYmJkFsbFdvcmRzJiYmJiZnU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmYWxzZQ==\">2020 SCC OnLine SC 283<\/a> and opined that, even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, for the marriage contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that Court&#39;s endeavour had always been to balance the equities amongst two wives though the second might not be understood in the strict sense as a legally wedded &#8220;wife&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on Circular Memo dated 11-9-1996 and opined that if the government employee contracted second marriage with permission of the competent authority, such wife would have legal status for all purposes for receiving family pension along with the first wife and the children of the first wife, in terms of sub-rule (6) of Rule 50 of the 1980 Rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <i>Badshah<\/i> v. <i>Urmila Badshah Godse<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDIwMTQpIDEgU0NDIDE4OCYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\">(2014) 1 SCC 188<\/a> and opined that the object of providing family pension to wife after the death of the husband could not be different from the object of providing maintenance during lifetime of the husband in case of divorce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that intention of Rule 50 of the 1980 Rules was to give relief to the woman becoming wife. Under such circumstances, even the wife from the second marriage was made entitled for family pension as the main object of the Rule 50 was to give family pension to &#8216;wives&#39;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court while allowing the petition in part, modified the Tribunal Order stating that arrear towards maintenance granted to the petitioner during the lifetime of and against, the deceased, should go to the petitioner. Further, the due towards the service benefits, including the claim for medical bills of the deceased would go to Respondent 5. Moreover, with respect to the family pension, both the petitioner and Respondent 5 should be entitled to equal shares.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Gaddam Ruth Victoria v. State of Andhra Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/26845MK0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine AP 1690<\/a>, decided on 18-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Sreemannarayana Vattikuti, Advocate;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: GP for Services-II; Satish Kumar, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Rule 50 of the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980 is with intend to give relief to the woman becoming wife. Under such circumstances, even the wife from the second marriage was made entitled for family pension.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":290507,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2553,31152,35257,60472],"class_list":["post-299810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Andhra_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-second-wife","tag-service-benefits","tag-service-claims"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-22T10:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-25T09:42:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/\",\"name\":\"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-22T10:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-25T09:42:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"andhra pradesh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog","description":"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-22T10:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-25T09:42:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","name":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-22T10:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-25T09:42:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that even if it was found that the second wife did not acquire the status of wife, still for the service benefits and service claims of the deceased husband, she was entitled for protection.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"andhra pradesh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-mere-allegations-of-pressure-or-harassment-at-workplace-will-not-suffice-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-306-ipc-proof-of-instigation-and-abetment-is-necessary\/","url_meta":{"origin":299810,"position":0},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court | Mere allegations of pressure or harassment at workplace will not suffice to attract ingredients of S. 306 IPC; Proof of instigation and abetment is necessary","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Andhra Pradesh High Court: Subba Reddy Satti J. granted anticipatory bail to the Chief Executing Officer (applicant-accused) as on perusal of complaint there was no sign of instigation and abetment and mere allegation of harassment will not attract offence under Section 306 Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') unless such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/andhrapradesh-high-court-directs-pending-dues-brother-legal-heir-deceased-teacher-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":299810,"position":1},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court directs payment of pending dues to brother of deceased Government Teacher after 37-year legal battle","author":"Arunima","date":"May 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, despite a binding legal heir certificate and multiple court decrees, the petitioner was denied his sister\u2019s death benefits for over three decades. The authorities relied on undocumented claims and misplaced service records to justify non-payment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-allows-transfer-of-divorce-petition-based-upon-wifes-inconvenience-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":299810,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Andhra Pradesh HC allows transfer of divorce petition on account of wife&#8217;s inconvenience in a matrimonial proceeding","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be considered than inconvenience of the husband. There are grounds to consider the request of the petitioner to transfer the petition.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/19\/ap-hc-maintenance-order-passed-without-filing-statements-assets-not-illegal-if-income-not-denied-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":299810,"position":3},"title":"Maintenance order passed without filing statements of assets and liabilities by wife not illegal, if income not specifically denied by husband: Andhra Pradesh HC","author":"Arushi","date":"February 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner submitted that the Trial Court erred in allowing the petition even without filing the statement of assets and liabilities and the respondent herself deserted the petitioner and yet, sought maintenance, therefore, she is not entitled to claim any interim maintenance.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/07\/bombay-high-court-first-wife-entitled-to-freedom-fighter-pension-after-demise-second-wife-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":299810,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court decides deceased&#8217;s first wife&#8217;s entitlement after she was denied pension due to second wife","author":"Arunima","date":"August 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Petitioner is 86 years of age today and though she is a legally wedded wife, she received no pension after the demise of her husband for 25 years only because the second wife Rukhminibai was paid the pension after the demise of the freedom fighter husband.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":54661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/05\/wife-of-the-complainants-brother-not-a-relative-of-the-husband-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":299810,"position":5},"title":"Wife of the Complainant\u2019s brother not a \u2018relative of the husband\u2019 under S. 498-A IPC","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 5, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: While interpreting the definition of \u2018Husband\u2019s relatives under Section 498A Penal Code, 1860, the Bench comprising of U. Durga Prasad Rao, J. held that the definition could not be stretched to include the wife of one's elder brother. In the present petition, the Complainant and her\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=299810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299810\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=299810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=299810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=299810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}