{"id":299703,"date":"2023-08-21T09:00:49","date_gmt":"2023-08-21T03:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=299703"},"modified":"2023-08-19T16:08:27","modified_gmt":"2023-08-19T10:38:27","slug":"2023-scc-vol-7-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\na:hover {\n  color: blue;\n  font-weight: bold;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544989\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544910\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">11<\/a>:<\/Span> Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable when: (i) suit concerns\/affects non-signatories to arbitration agreement; and (ii) suit is in respect of matter which falls partly outside the arbitration agreement i.e. substantive relief claimed in suit falls outside the arbitration Clause. Arbitration agreement\/clause is not binding on non-signatories. Partial bifurcation of suit, so as to refer a part of suit to arbitration is not permissible. [<i>Gujarat Composite Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>A Infrastructure Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593057\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 193<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> and Or. 21:<\/Span> Alteration of terms of decree by executing court is not permissible. [<i>Sanwarlal Agrawal<\/i> v. <i>Ashok Kumar Kothari<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593065\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 307<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> &#8212; Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a>:<\/Span> Vague definitions and classification in creation of offence(s) and conferment of unguided power to investigate the same, that too by government order rather than legislation is sufficient for invalidation of the same. [<i>State of T.N.<\/i> v. <i>R. Thamaraiselvam<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593060\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 251<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Courts, Tribunals and Judiciary &#8212; Judicial process &#8212; Judicial Decision\/Judicial function\/Judicial reasoning &#8212; Judgment:<\/Span> Necessity of structure and clarity in judgment, emphasized. &#8220;Incomprehensible&#8221; High Court order set aside and matter remitted to High Court for consideration afresh. [<i>SBI<\/i> v. <i>Ajay Kumar Sood<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593063\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 282<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519645\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">360<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519335\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">107<\/a> &#8212; Benefit of probation under S. 360 &#8212; Grant of:<\/Span> Factors to be considered for grant of probation, explained. [<i>Soori<\/i> v. <i>State of Karnataka<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593061\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 257<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559499\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(15)<\/a> [as amended by the Finance Act, 2011 (w.e.f. 1-4-2012) and the Finance Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 1-4-2016)]:<\/Span> Conditions for exemption vis-&agrave;-vis charitable purpose of advancement of any other object of general public utility (GPU), explained. Applicability of judgment dt. 19-10-2022, Ahmedabad UDA, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001471610\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 561<\/a>, clarified. [<i>CIT<\/i> v. <i>Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593059\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 249<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549751\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25(2)(a) &amp; (g)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549761\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">29<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549673\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18(1)(a) &amp; (g)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549762\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(27)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549784\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">5(10)<\/a> &#8212; Rights and interests created in the facts of the case, in favour of corporate debtor partaking the character of ownership rights over immovable property:<\/Span> Entitlement of resolution professional to take control of assets owned by third party in possession of corporate debtor held under contractual arrangements, determined. Meaning, explanation and relevance of the terms &#8220;property&#8221; and &#8220;assets&#8221;, explained. Difference in powers\/duties of resolution professional (RP) under S. 25 and interim resolution professional (IRP) under S. 18, illustrated. S. 18 Expln. is not applicable to RP acting under S. 25. Principles clarified relating to jurisdiction of NCLT\/NCLAT in such cases to grant orders protecting possession of the corporate debtor at instance of RP. [<i>Victory Iron Works Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Jitendra Lohia<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593058\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 227<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549763\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">30<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549764\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">31<\/a>:<\/Span> Modification\/Alteration of resolution plan post its approval by adjudicating authority is not permissible. SREI Multiple Asset Investment Trust [<i>Vision India Fund<\/i> v. <i>Deccan Chronicle Marketeers<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593064\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 295<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> &#8212; Rape and murder of minor:<\/Span> Modification of sentence of life imprisonment for entire biological life of convict, without any benefit of remission, to reduced fixed term sentence, when warranted, explained. [<i>Kashi Nath Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of Jharkhand<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593066\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 317<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Service Tax &#8212; Taxable Services &#8212; Works contract services:<\/Span> Leviability of service tax, explained. [<i>Commr. of Customs, Excise &amp; Service Tax<\/i> v. <i>Interarch Building Products (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593062\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 259<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><Span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563670\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">28<\/a>:<\/Span> Ownership, and, perpetual right to use over trademark, distinguished between. [<i>SREI Multiple Asset Investment Trust Vision India Fund<\/i> v. <i>Deccan Chronicle Marketeers<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001593064\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 7 SCC 295<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &#8212; Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":299707,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[58182,10131,8331,7601,20601,13081,38809,60414],"class_list":["post-299703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-2023-scc","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-finance-act","tag-income-tax-act","tag-rape-and-murder","tag-taxable-services"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-21T03:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-21T03:30:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times","description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-21T03:30:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/","name":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-21T03:30:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-2.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":268453,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/joinder-of-non-signatories-a-stepping-stone-towards-international-commercial-arbitrations\/","url_meta":{"origin":299703,"position":0},"title":"Joinder of Non-Signatories: A Stepping Stone Towards International Commercial Arbitrations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Simran Pahwa\u2020 and Yasha Goyal\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/bom-hc-salutary-object-of-arbitration-conciliation-act-cannot-be-defeated-by-adding-a-claim-over-and-above-the-claim-squarely-covered-by-arbitration-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":299703,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Salutary object of Arbitration &#038; Conciliation Act cannot be defeated by adding a claim over and above the claim squarely covered by arbitration agreement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: N.J. Jamadar, J., while disposing of an interim application filed by the defendants in a commercial division summary suit, held that the salutary object of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,\u00a0cannot be defeated by adding a claim over and above the claim in respect of the matter\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258409,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/13\/excepted-excluded-matters-in-arbitration-agreement-cannot-be-referred-to-resolution-by-way-of-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":299703,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Excepted\/excluded matters in arbitration agreement cannot be referred to resolution by way of arbitration","author":"Editor","date":"December 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: SR Krishna Kumar, J., disposed of the petition and directed the petitioner-company to avail such remedies as available in law. The instant petition was filed by the petitioner company under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 wherein it seeks resolution of disputes with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/madras-hc-court-cannot-suo-motu-return-a-suit-at-threshold-on-the-ground-that-parties-had-agreed-to-refer-all-disputes-to-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":299703,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Court cannot suo motu return a suit at threshold on the ground that parties had agreed to refer all disputes to arbitration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0P.T. Asha, J., held that Section 8 of the Arbitration Conciliation Act, 1996 clearly indicate that the role of judicial authority to refer parties to arbitration arises only upon an application being made by a party to the arbitration agreement. The High Court was faced with a very\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":283204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/madras-high-court-non-signatories-can-join-as-parties-to-arbitral-proceedings-if-they-are-the-alter-ego-of-the-signatory-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":299703,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court| Non-signatories can join as parties to arbitral proceedings, if they are the \u2018alter ego\u2019 of the signatory","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that the petitioners are not entitled to join respondents 3 to 5 as parties to arbitral proceedings, as they do not qualify as \u201calter egos\u201d of the first respondent or as successors-in-interest.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":200373,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/20\/arbitration-clause-held-to-survive-even-when-leave-and-licence-agreement-was-mutually-terminated\/","url_meta":{"origin":299703,"position":5},"title":"Arbitration Clause held to survive even when Leave and Licence Agreement was mutually terminated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mridula Bhatkar, J. directed the trial court to refer the matter before it to the Arbitrator holding that it had no jurisdiction to try the suit. The respondent \u2013 original plaintiff \u2013 had filed a suit based on an agreement entered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=299703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299703\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/299707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=299703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=299703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=299703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}