{"id":299546,"date":"2023-08-17T17:30:47","date_gmt":"2023-08-17T12:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=299546"},"modified":"2023-08-18T15:42:51","modified_gmt":"2023-08-18T10:12:51","slug":"election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\na:hover {\n  color: blue;\n  font-weight: bold;\n}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Supreme Court:<\/b> In an appeal challenging the legality and validity of judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court on 25-04-2022 setting aside order and recounting of votes undertaken on 31-12-2021 for Gram Panchayat elections for the post of Sarpanch, the Division Bench of <b>Bela M. Trivedi*<\/b> and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ. held the Election Petition filed before the Sub Divisional Officer seeking re-counting of votes only not maintainable for not following the procedure laid in the rules regarding re-counting of votes.<\/p>\n<p><b>Summary of Facts<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Gram Panchayat elections for Sarpanch were conducted on 28-01-2020, wherein, the petitioner and 5 of the respondents contested for the post. Election results were declared electing respondent No.1 as the Sarpanch. On 7-02-2020, the petitioner came up with the Election Petition praying for recounting of votes on the ground that counting of votes was hurriedly done in the late evening hours and there was insufficient light (brightness) at the three polling stations. The Sub Divisional Officer allowed the said petition and directed the recounting of votes and the same was passed by the SDO. The said order was challenged before the High Court which was allowed on the ground that the SDO did not follow due procedure of law. The High Court also directed the SDO to decide the Election Petition in accordance with the provisions contained in Rule 11 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (&#8216;1995 Rules&#8217;). On recounting of votes, the petitioner was declared as the elected Sarpanch. The challenge against the same was dismissed by the Single Bench of High Court but allowed by the Division Bench on the ground that the relief claimed by the petitioner was not in consonance with Rule 6 of 1995 Rules.<\/p>\n<p><b>Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court in the instant matter considered the question of &#8220;whether the petitioner&#8217;s Election Petition before the Sub Divisional Officer seeking recounting of votes only, in the absence of any relief under Rule 6 of 1995 Rules was maintainable?&#8221; The Court highlighted that as per Section 122 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (&#8216;1993 Act&#8217;), an election could be questioned only by a petition in the prescribed manner, and for Panchayat elections, it was to be presented to the Sub Divisional Officer within 30 days from the date on which the election in question was notified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court pointed towards the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 (&#8216;Election Rules 1995&#8217;) framed by the State government while exercising powers conferred by Section 95(1) read with Section 43 of 1993 Act, whose Chapter IX dealt with &#8216;Poll and voting for election&#8217;. The Court further scrutinised Rule 77(1) and 77(2) laying the provision regarding counting of votes, and Rule 80 for recounting of votes, Rule 5 pertaining to &#8216;Contents of the petition&#8217; and Rule 6 for &#8216;Relief that may be claimed by the petitioner&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p><b>Case Laws on Recounting of Votes<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court particularly pointed out decision of 3-Judge Bench in <i>Sohan Lal<\/i> v. <i>Babu Gandhi<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/53WSf3hy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2003) 1 SCC 108<\/a> dealing with similar set of laws for Panchayat elections wherein, it was observed that there was no prohibition upon the Court or Tribunal to direct re-counting of the votes. The Court relied on the said judgment stating that it may not be possible for the party to apply for re-counting of votes to the Returning Officer till the result is declared, and the only remedy would be filing the Election Petition, for which, a Court or Tribunal is bound to consider the matter and direct re-counting depending upon the evidence laid.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Coming back to the question of law in the instant matter, the Court hinted towards the settled law that &#8220;where a right or a liability is created by a statue, which gives a special remedy for enforcing it, the remedy provided by the statue must be availed of&#8221; and that &#8220;if a Statue provides for doing a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner.&#8221; The Court relied on <i>Cherukuri Mani<\/i> v. <i>State of A.P.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/X8mdt2P5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2015) 13 SCC 722<\/a> wherein, the Court observed that &#8220;where the law prescribes a thing to be done in a particular manner following a particular procedure, it shall be done in the same manner following the provisions of law, without deviating from the prescribed procedure.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding facts of the instant case, the Court expressed that Section 122 of 1993 Act provided for election to be called in question only by a petition presented in the prescribed manner, and the said manner was prescribed under the 1995 Rules. Its Rule 6 pertaining to relief to be claimed provided that the petitioner may claim a declaration that the election of all or any of the returned candidates is void; and in addition, thereto a further declaration that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected. The Court therefore clarified that as per Sohan Lal case (supra), the Court or Tribunal may direct recounting of votes in the Election Petition, but only seeking re-counting of votes in the absence of any other reliefs (e.g., declarations as contemplated in Rule 6) would not be tenable as per law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the petitioner was required to file an Election Petition under Section 122 of 1993 Act in consonance with Rule 6 of 1995 Rules. The Court referred to <i>Laxmi Singh<\/i> v. <i>Rekha Singh<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VzwZhYp1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2020) 6 SCC 812<\/a> and commented that &#8220;There is hardly any need to reiterate the trite position of law that when it comes to the interpretation of statutory provisions relating to election law, jurisprudence on the subject mandates strict construction of the provisions Election contest is not an action at law or a suit in equity but purely a statutory proceeding, provision for which has to be strictly construed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held the Election Petition filed before the Sub Divisional Officer seeking re-counting of votes only not maintainable, since the petitioner failed to make a written application for re-counting of votes as per Section 80 of 1995 Rules and failed to seek relief as per the requirements of Rule 6 of 1995 Rules. Therefore, the instant appeal was dismissed by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dharmin Bai Kashyap v. Babli Sahu, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hj9Ppmqv\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1000<\/a>, decided on 16-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Judgment authored by: Justice Bela M. Trivedi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"124JWRRlM4\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/10\/know-your-judge-supreme-court-of-india-bela-m-trivedi-career-judgments-legal-news\/\">Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Bela Madhurya Trivedi<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Bela Madhurya Trivedi&#8221; &#8212; SCC Blog\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/10\/know-your-judge-supreme-court-of-india-bela-m-trivedi-career-judgments-legal-news\/embed\/#?secret=0i2t4l7aHa#?secret=124JWRRlM4\" data-secret=\"124JWRRlM4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Appellants: Advocate on Record Sameer Shrivastava, Advocate Satvic Mathur, Advocate Yashika Varshney;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Advocate on Record Abhinav Shrivastava, Advocate Sudhir Verma, Advocate Ritu Reniwal, Advocate Mahesh Kumar, Advocate Sunit Kumar Toppo, Advocate Shivam Sharma, Advocate Devika Khanna, Advocate V. D. Khanna, Advocate on Record Vmz Chambers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>&#8220;Where a right or a liability is created by a statue, which gives a special remedy for enforcing it, the remedy provided by the statue must be availed of.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":299555,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[30747,60363,34700,5363],"class_list":["post-299546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-election-process","tag-panchayat-election","tag-recounting-of-votes","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Election contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; provision must be strictly construed: Supreme Court<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court pressed on strictly following the procedure laid for election contests and particularly for recounting of votes\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court pressed on strictly following the procedure laid for election contests and particularly for recounting of votes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-17T12:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-18T10:12:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Election contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; provision must be strictly construed: Supreme Court\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-17T12:00:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-18T10:12:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court pressed on strictly following the procedure laid for election contests and particularly for recounting of votes\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"election contest process\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Election contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; provision must be strictly construed: Supreme Court","description":"Supreme Court pressed on strictly following the procedure laid for election contests and particularly for recounting of votes","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court","og_description":"Supreme Court pressed on strictly following the procedure laid for election contests and particularly for recounting of votes","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-17T12:00:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-18T10:12:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/","name":"Election contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; provision must be strictly construed: Supreme Court","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-17T12:00:47+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-18T10:12:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Supreme Court pressed on strictly following the procedure laid for election contests and particularly for recounting of votes","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"election contest process"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/election-contest-not-legal-action-equity-suit-purely-statutory-proceeding-provision-strictly-construed-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cElection contest not an action at law or suit in equity, but a purely statutory proceeding; Election provisions must be strictly construed\u201d: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/election-contest-process.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/02\/all-hc-order-of-deciding-application-does-not-matter-where-3-election-petitions-were-filed-with-different-prayers\/","url_meta":{"origin":299546,"position":0},"title":"All HC | Order of deciding application does not matter where 3 election petitions were filed with different prayers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Three election petitions were filed before the bench of Siddhartha Varma, J. under Section 12-C of the U.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1947 against the election process with regard to the election of a Pradhan of Gram Panchayat where Manju, respondent was declared elected. Petitioner prayed for re-counting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":304541,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-initial-counting-result-in-west-bengal-panchayat-elections-2023-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":299546,"position":1},"title":"West Bengal Panchayat Elections 2023 | Calcutta High Court rejects recounting process as non-compliant with Law; upholds initial counting result","author":"Ritu","date":"October 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court emphasized on the importance of a free, fair, and transparent election process for upholding democracy and maintaining the public\u2019s faith in the system.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333776,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/24\/supreme-court-directs-for-fresh-recount-of-votes-gram-pradhan-election-court-commissioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":299546,"position":2},"title":"[Gram Pradhan Election] Supreme Court directs fresh recount of votes; Appoints junior most lady advocate present in Court as Court Commissioner","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court directed that the entire process of recounting of votes should be video-graphed, and the result of re-count to be signed by the parties, their counsel as well as the Court Commissioner, besides the Presiding Officer of the Election Tribunal.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gram Pradhan election","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Gram-Pradhan-election.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Gram-Pradhan-election.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Gram-Pradhan-election.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Gram-Pradhan-election.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205935,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/order-of-conducting-re-election-during-the-pendency-of-an-enquiry-before-the-deputy-commissioner-is-not-ultra-vires-the-provisions-of-jk-panchayati-raj-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":299546,"position":3},"title":"Ordering re-poll during pendency of an enquiry before Deputy Commissioner, is not ultra vires of J&#038;K Panchayati Raj Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of the Deputy Chief Electoral Officer, whereby re-poll had been ordered for the post of a Sarpanch in the Panchayat Halqa Upper Sanai, Block Surankote. The main issue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/supreme-court-recount-prayagraj-gram-panchayat-election\/","url_meta":{"origin":299546,"position":4},"title":"\u201cEach vote\u2019s sanctity must be protected, irrespective of its effect on election outcome\u201d; SC orders recount in Prayagraj Gram Panchayat election","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight from the inception of democratic rule, universal adult franchise has found its place in our system of governance. Each election upholding these cherished values of public participation, equality and integrity of the vote is a testament to the vision of the founders.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Prayagraj election","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295062,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/supreme-court-dismisses-plea-against-calcutta-hc-order-directing-deployment-central-forces-bengal-panchayat-polls\/","url_meta":{"origin":299546,"position":5},"title":"West Bengal Panchayat Polls: Supreme Court upholds Calcutta HC order directing deployment of Central Forces","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court asked the State Election Commission that why it is concerned with the source of the forces, as its primary concern must be free and fair elections","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bengal panchayat polls","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/bengal-panchayat-polls.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/bengal-panchayat-polls.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/bengal-panchayat-polls.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/bengal-panchayat-polls.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=299546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299546\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/299555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=299546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=299546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=299546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}