{"id":298653,"date":"2023-08-05T13:30:49","date_gmt":"2023-08-05T08:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=298653"},"modified":"2023-08-07T15:57:37","modified_gmt":"2023-08-07T10:27:37","slug":"premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court<\/span>: In a petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> challenging Mahalunge-Maan Preliminary Town Planning Scheme sanctioned under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002874783\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">86(1)(a)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002874824\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966<\/a> (&#8216;MRTP Act&#39;) and the one prepared by the Arbitrator under Section 72(6) of MRTP Act, the Division Bench of G.S. Kulkarni and R.N. Laddha, JJ. found the instant petition to be premature since as per law, the petitioners will still get an opportunity of being heard once the scheme gets notified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The 55 petitioners in the instant matter claimed that they were denied compensation of lands acquired for public purposes. The petitioners objected that the authorities prepared a scheme for the purposes of Section 61 of MRTP Act without considering their objections and suggestions, that there were discrepancies in the draft scheme regarding specifications of plot allotment, that the arbitrator ignored their grievances, etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court scrutinized Sections 60 to 95 of MRTP Act laying a complete mechanism\/procedural formality to be followed for acquisition of land and subsequent part of the arbitrator. The Court clarified that the instant matter did not dispute award of compensation for land acquisition or acquiring private property for public use, which may otherwise be against Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575115\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>. It further did not dispute the State government&#39;s power to set up Appeal Tribunal for Town Planning Schemes under Section 75 of MRTP Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted the facts that Pune Municipal Region Development Authority (&#8216;PMRDA&#39;) had suggested changes\/modifications to the draft town planning Scheme (Mahalunge-Maan) and that the said changes would substantially change the final plots and Scheme&#39;s assessment details requiring a new start of arbitration proceedings. The PMRDA had recommended creation of Appellate Tribunal on 20-05-2022 to which, the Director of Town Planning, MS stated to be established after draft Scheme was approved and published. Further, after approval of the draft scheme, the petitioners would get an opportunity to be heard by the arbitrator.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that since the petitioners would have an opportunity to echo all their grievances as per law at the appropriate time even before the arbitrator, after notification of the final scheme. Therefore, the Court refrained from expressing its opinion on merits or issues in the instant matter. The Court regarded the instant petition as premature and disposed of the same accordingly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Chandrakant Uttam Kolekar v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/26q2iLNs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Bom 1576<\/a>, decided on 2-08-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Judgment by: Justice R.N. Laddha<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Advocate Madhavi Ayyappan<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader B.V. Samant, Assistant Government Pleader Rupali M. Shinde, Senior Advocate Rajiv Chavan, Advocate Vijaykumar Dhakane, Advocate Dinesh Adsule<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The 55 petitioners in the instant matter claimed that they were denied compensation of lands acquired for public purposes. <\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,60055,60057,46038,60056],"class_list":["post-298653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-mahalunge-maan","tag-pmrda-project","tag-town-planning","tag-town-planning-scheme"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>&#039;Premature Petition&#039;; Bombay HC dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismissed challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme by the land owners alleging lapse under MRTP Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition&#039;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismissed challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme by the land owners alleging lapse under MRTP Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-05T08:00:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-07T10:27:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition&#039;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/\",\"name\":\"'Premature Petition'; Bombay HC dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-05T08:00:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-07T10:27:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court dismissed challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme by the land owners alleging lapse under MRTP Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"bombay high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition&#8217;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Premature Petition'; Bombay HC dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme | SCC Blog","description":"Bombay High Court dismissed challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme by the land owners alleging lapse under MRTP Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition'","og_description":"Bombay High Court dismissed challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme by the land owners alleging lapse under MRTP Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-05T08:00:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-07T10:27:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition'","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/","name":"'Premature Petition'; Bombay HC dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-05T08:00:49+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-07T10:27:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Bombay High Court dismissed challenge against Mahalunge-Maan TP Scheme by the land owners alleging lapse under MRTP Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"bombay high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/premature-petition-bombay-high-court-dismisses-challenge-mahalunge-maan-t-p-scheme\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court dismisses challenge against Mahalunge-Maan Town Planning Scheme by calling it as a \u2018premature petition&#8217;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/bombay-hc-directs-mcgm-to-follow-mrtp-provisions-allows-owner-church-petition-regarding-land-reserved-for-public-purposes\/","url_meta":{"origin":298653,"position":0},"title":"[Land Acquisition] Bombay HC directs Municipal Corporation to follow MRTP Act to acquire church\u2019s land reserved for public purposes","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that until the Municipal Corporation resorted to appropriate procedure in law to acquire the disputed land, it should not disturb the peaceful possession of the Church in any manner whatsoever.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/regularization-unauthorized-construction-beyond-purview-section-56-mrtp-act-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":298653,"position":1},"title":"Regularization of unauthorized construction beyond the purview of Section 56 of MRTP Act: Bombay High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that no provision enables regularization of construction raised on open spaces earmarked in development plan or Town Planning Scheme.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/06\/land-reservation-lapse-supreme-court-mrtp-act-acquisition-timeline\/","url_meta":{"origin":298653,"position":2},"title":"Strict adherence to MRTP Act\u2019s acquisition timeline is essential, land reservation lapses if no action is taken: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt does not make any good sense to keep a plot reserved in a development plan for the past 33 years. The Authority did not allow the original owners to use the land and are now not permitting even the purchasers to utilize the land.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Land Reservation MRTP Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Land-Reservation-MRTP-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Land-Reservation-MRTP-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Land-Reservation-MRTP-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Land-Reservation-MRTP-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/10\/confusion-over-sections-21-and-38-of-the-maharashtra-regional-and-town-planning-act-1966-cleared\/","url_meta":{"origin":298653,"position":3},"title":"Confusion over Sections 21 and 38 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 cleared","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 10, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dealing with the question that whether, the plan first prepared and notified under\u00a0Section 21 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (\u2018MRTP Act\u2019) is the final development plan and the plan prepared under Section 38 is only a revision of the final development plan proposed under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358813,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/03\/bombay-hc-dismisses-pil-on-mobile-tower-health-hazards\/","url_meta":{"origin":298653,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court dismisses Jagruk Nagrik Sanghatana\u2019s PIL alleging health hazards from telecommunication (mobile) towers","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court further noted that the new statutory framework under Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Telecommunications (Right of Way) Rules, 2024, now governs the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunication towers.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"mobile tower health hazard","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/bom-222.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/bom-222.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/bom-222.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/bom-222.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357150,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/high-court-judgements-on-municipal-law-urban-development\/","url_meta":{"origin":298653,"position":5},"title":"Case Reported in HCC | High Courts on Municipal Law and Urban Development, Rehabilitation Schemes and Housing Governance by Local Authorities","author":"Nikita","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore latest cases reported in SCC\u2019S High Court Cases (HCC) on matter related to Town Planning, Implementation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS), Scheme of development and Licence requirement for private market, Eligibility to vote for selection of developer, Lapse of sanction and cancellation of allotment of DDA flat after reallocation","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Judgements on Municipal Law and Urban Development","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Judgements-on-Municipal-Law-and-Urban-Development.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Judgements-on-Municipal-Law-and-Urban-Development.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Judgements-on-Municipal-Law-and-Urban-Development.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Judgements-on-Municipal-Law-and-Urban-Development.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298653\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}