{"id":298529,"date":"2023-08-04T13:30:08","date_gmt":"2023-08-04T08:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=298529"},"modified":"2023-08-07T17:10:07","modified_gmt":"2023-08-07T11:40:07","slug":"delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/","title":{"rendered":"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway’s plea regarding arbitral award being perverse"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/b> A petition was filed by Indian Railways, Union of India (petitioner) under Section 34<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> to set aside the arbitral award dated 02-05-2019 and the rectified Award dated 31-07-2019. Chandra Dhari Singh, J., held that the petitioner has failed to substantiate its grounds for setting aside the impugned Arbitral Award that the impugned award suffers from patent illegality and the findings therein are perverse, or the Arbitrator has not considered the pleadings and evidence placed before him and has arrived at a conclusion that is implausible.<\/p>\n

The petitioner is Indian Railways, one of the transport organisation of the country and an autonomous body under the Union of India. The respondent is Besco Limited (Wagon Division), a public limited company with headquarters in Kolkata and is engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing various equipment including the rail wagons which are being supplied to the petitioner. The petitioner floated the tender for manufacturing and supply of different types of wagons with a corrigendum, as per which a new kind of wagon i.e., BCNHL wagon, had to be manufactured and all the bidders were required to submit the prototype of the wagon. The respondent was awarded the contract, as per which 2937 wagons were to be released in two tranches by the petitioner in favor of the respondent with 1469 wagons in first tranche (I Tranche) and 1468 wagons in the second tranche (II Tranche).<\/p>\n

The disputes arose between the parties when the petitioner deducted and diverted 253 wagons from II tranche on the basis that the respondent had failed to supply 50% of the total orders outstanding in accordance with Clause 2.2 of the Contract, which were required before the release of the II tranche. A legal notice was issued, and arbitration was invoked by the respondent on the ground that the petitioner diverting wagons and delaying the release of quantities. The Award was passed on 02-05-2019 and passed the rectified award dated 31-07-2019 wherein the Tribunal partially allowed the rectification, clarification and modification.<\/p>\n

The petitioner made two broad sets of claims before the Arbitrator as follows:<\/p>\n

(i) for allocation of the said 253 wagons (119 BOXNHL and 134 BCNHL wagons); in the alternate compensation for Rs. 16,46,00,407\/- as loss of profit,<\/p>\n

(ii) Claim for a sum of Rs.28,56,53,627.54\/- (which was subsequently revised) for loss caused on account of the said delay in releasing the second tranche order by more than eight months.<\/p>\n

On the aspect of Claim No. 1, the Court noted that a review of the Award reveals that the Arbitrator has carefully examined the evidence presented by both parties and has provided a reasoned analysis of the facts and law. Disagreements with the arbitrator’s evaluation of the evidence do not amount to valid grounds for setting aside the Award. Cogent grounds, sufficient reasons have been assigned by Sole Arbitrator in reaching the just conclusion and no error of law or misconduct is apparent on the face of the record. Thus, the Court cannot re-apprise the evidence and it is not open to this Court to sit in the appeal over the conclusion\/findings of facts arrived at by learned Sole Arbitrator.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court decided not to interfere with the Award passed by Arbitrator qua issue no. 1 regarding for allocation of the said 253 wagons in the alternate compensation for Rs. 16,46,00,407\/- as loss of profit.<\/p>\n

On the aspect of Claim No. 2, the Court noted that the Arbitrator has rightly held that without substantiating the loss accrued, such loss cannot be awarded to the petitioner. The loss can be made only if there is proof that such loss has been suffered by the party claiming such damage. Thus, the Court decided not to interfere with the award qua claim 2.<\/p>\n

[Union of India v Besco Limited, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 4559<\/a>, decided on 31-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mr. Sarvan Kumar, GP, Ms. Sunita Shukla and Mr. Daghmesh Tripathi, Advocates for the Petitioners;<\/p>\n

Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Suman Jyoti Khaitan, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Ms. Aarzu Khattar, Mr. Umang Tyagi and Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocates for the Respondents.<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Indian Railway’s has failed to substantiate its grounds for setting aside the impugned Arbitral Award that the impugned award suffers from patent illegality and the findings therein are perverse and would shock the conscience of this Court.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2633,3226,2728,2543,60004,35210,27524],"class_list":["post-298529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral_award","tag-arbitration","tag-compensation","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-indian-railway","tag-patent-illegality","tag-section-34"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC refuses interference in arbitral award passed against Indian Railways| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse and patently illegal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse and patently illegal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-04T08:00:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-07T11:40:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC refuses interference in arbitral award passed against Indian Railways| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-04T08:00:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-07T11:40:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse and patently illegal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway’s plea regarding arbitral award being perverse\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC refuses interference in arbitral award passed against Indian Railways| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse and patently illegal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse","og_description":"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse and patently illegal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-04T08:00:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-07T11:40:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/","name":"Delhi HC refuses interference in arbitral award passed against Indian Railways| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-08-04T08:00:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-07T11:40:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway's plea regarding arbitral award being perverse and patently illegal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/delhi-hc-refuses-interference-arbitral-award-passed-against-indian-railway-patent-illegal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[S. 34 Arbitration Act] Delhi High Court refuses to interfere in Indian Railway’s plea regarding arbitral award being perverse"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/section-34-of-arbitration-act-a-well-reasoned-arbitral-award-cannot-be-interfered-with-delhi-high-court-on-limited-scope-of-interference-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":298529,"position":0},"title":"[Section 34 of Arbitration Act] A well-reasoned arbitral award cannot be interfered with: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Arbitral Tribunal is a creature of Contract, and the Contract is the only basis on which the Learned Tribunal should adjudicate, apart from the general provisions of law and jurisprudence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/delhi-high-court-partly-sets-aside-arbitral-award-passed-by-sole-arbitrator-being-patently-illegal-contrary-to-the-lines-of-contract-legal-news-research-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":298529,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Interest cannot be withheld in the absence of express provisions permitting the same\u2019; Delhi High Court partially sets aside arbitral award for being patently illegal","author":"Arunima","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The impugned arbitral award was passed without considering the clauses of the Concessionaire Agreement while adjudicating on the rate of interest to be granted, thus, suffers from infirmity and patent illegality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/delhi-high-court-rule-of-contra-proferentem-to-uphold-arbitral-award-patent-illegal-against-fundamental-policy-of-indian-law-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":298529,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court applies the rule of \u2018contra proferentem\u2019 to uphold the arbitral award not being hit by \u2018patent illegality\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ground of Patent illegality gives way to setting aside an Arbitral Award with a very minimal scope of intervention. A party cannot simply raise an objection on the ground of patent illegality if the Award is simply against them. Patent illegality requires a distinct transgression of law, the clear\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":325330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/29\/what-is-scope-of-hcs-power-under-section-37-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-ori-hc-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":298529,"position":3},"title":"Orissa High Court explains scope of High Court\u2019s power under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act","author":"Ritu","date":"June 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court held that the court\u2019s intervention is limited and emphasised on the autonomy of the arbitral process and the finality of the arbitral award.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/29\/delhi-high-court-section34-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-fraud-public-policy-arbitral-tribunal-international-bar-association-rules-international-arbitration-governmenta-authority-nation\/","url_meta":{"origin":298529,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court set aside arbitral award as it suffers from patent illegalities, and fraud and conflicts with the Public Policy of India","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (\u2018the Act\u2019) for setting aside of the arbitral award dated 14.09.2015 allowing the claim of the respondent, Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. has held that the impugned award dated 14.09.2015 suffers from patent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290964,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/agreement-specifying-no-interest-to-be-granted-takes-away-arbitrators-power-to-deviate-and-grant-his-own-interest-rate-delhi-high-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":298529,"position":5},"title":"Agreement specifying \u2018no interest to be granted\u2019 takes away Arbitrator’s power to deviate and grant his own interest rate: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if the Arbitrator is successful in justifying his reasons for deciding a rate of interest, the Agreement between the parties being the birth-giver, should be held at a higher stature when it concerns an issue that has been pre-decided and mutually agreed upon by the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298529\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}