{"id":298163,"date":"2023-07-31T17:45:24","date_gmt":"2023-07-31T12:15:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=298163"},"modified":"2023-08-04T17:24:45","modified_gmt":"2023-08-04T11:54:45","slug":"delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court:<\/b> A criminal contempt proceeding was taken up suo-motu upon receiving numerous complaints from legal practitioners and a report dated 24.02.2006 authored by the District &amp; Sessions Judge relating to the incident that occurred on 24-02-2006 at the Tis Hazari Courts, in addition to earlier incidents at the Tis Hazari and the Rohini Courts, where advocates went on strike, opposing the establishment of the Rohini Court complex. A full bench of Siddharth Mridul, Rajnish Bhatnagar, and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ., discharged the Show Cause Notices issued to the remaining alleged Contemnors in the present criminal contempt proceedings asking to show cause why criminal contempt be not drawn against the alleged contemnors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 24-02-2006, a comprehensive report was forwarded to the Court by the District &amp; Sessions Judge, Justice S.N. Dhingra, highlighting the need for initiating suo motu contempt of the Court proceedings against the errant advocates, which included numerous supporting documents, as well as reports from other Judges and officials functioning at the Tis Hazari Courts. Consequently, Show Cause Notices were issued to 25 individuals, requiring them to justify why they should not be penalized for committing the offence of criminal contempt of court, based on the allegations outlined in various reports and other supporting material. An interim order was passed imposing restrictions on the alleged Contemnors, prohibiting them from approaching within 500-meters from the premises of the Court compound of Delhi High Court or any Subordinate Courts falling under its jurisdiction, including Courts\/Tribunals under its supervisory jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Few responses to the show cause notices were filed explicitly asserting that they were not accountable for the acts of vandalism and provided a solemn undertaking that they shall refrain from engaging in any acts of vandalism, obstructing the ingress or egress of advocates attending the court proceedings, or disrupting the functioning of Court. Thus, the interim restraint order was modified by the Supreme Court stipulating that the petitioners would be allowed to carry out their professional duties pertaining to Courts and Tribunals, but they must refrain from engaging in any activity that the High Court has objected to.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">FIR was registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561407\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">147<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561466\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">186<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561667\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">353<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561644\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">332<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561765\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">427<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561468\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">188<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act and a chargesheet was filed. During the period from March to September 2006, a total of 13 Contemnors\/Respondents were either discharged or removed from the present criminal contempt proceedings, and 12 contemnors and respondents are still part of the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the Court had appropriately exercised its suo motu jurisdiction with respect to the occurrence of the purported incident that transpired in the District Courts of Delhi since the present proceedings are initiated against advocates, there is an additional requirement for stringent proof that this Court must fulfil.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On perusal of the evidence placed on record e-reports submitted by then District &amp; Session Judge, complaints lodged by various other Judges of the District Court, their Court Staff, Advocates, Media Personnel, as well as the statements recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519397\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">161<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> along with video CDs, Circulars, and press releases, the Court noted that there is no evidence linking the damage caused to the court rooms with the protest by the Advocates\/alleged Contemnors. Moreover, these actions cannot be directly attributed to the alleged Contemnors. Consequently, the material including the subject videos fails to provide any direct evidence connecting the damage allegedly caused to courtrooms with the Advocates&#8217; protest. Furthermore, the videos do not furnish any evidence of Advocates manhandling their colleagues, obstructing the Administration of Justice, or supporting any other allegations made against the alleged Contemnors in the present proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that there exists no substantial evidence to establish obstruction of justice, acts of manhandling, or destruction of property. Therefore, it cannot be conclusively established that the act of protesting interfered with the administration of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">In re to consider Suo Motu Contempt of Court v. Proceedings against the Tis Hazari Lawyers, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gbqsc14l\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 4433<\/a>, decided on 28-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioners: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae along with Ms. Shubhangi Jain, Mr. Yash Giri, Mr. Raju and Mr. Adityaa, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondents \/Contemnors: 1) Mr. Rajiv Khosla, Contemnor\/Respondent No.1 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">2) Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bakshi, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Praveen K. Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Nasiar, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 2 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">3) Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Mr. Rahul Sambher, Ms. Adeeb Ahmed, Mohd. Qasim Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Advocates for Mr. Jaiveer Singh Chauhan Contemnor\/Respondent No.3 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">4) Mr. A.K. Gupta, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 4 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">5) Mr. Dharmavir, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 7 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">6) Mr. Inder Singh Saroha, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 8 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">7) Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 9 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">8) Mr. Sunil Sherawat, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 12 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">9) Mr. Vikas Arya, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 17 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">10) Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 21 in-person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">11) Mr. Anil Kumar Chauhan, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 22 in person;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">12) Mr. Madan Lal Gupta, Contemnor\/Respondent No. 24 in-person.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The present contempt proceedings are pending adjudication since 2006 and all the alleged Contemnors have expressed their deep remorse and have stated that they have the utmost respect for the institution of judiciary and that it was never their intention to cause any distress or to do anything that could be construed as undermining the majesty and dignity of the Court of Law.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2564,3456,2543,31632,56596,8421,59876,49642,30629,49689,29084],"class_list":["post-298163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Contempt","tag-criminal_contempt","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-jurisidiction","tag-lawyers-association","tag-public-property","tag-rohini-court-complex","tag-rohini-courts","tag-show-cause","tag-tis-hazari","tag-vandalism"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi HC discharges show cause notice against lawyers| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices against Tis Hazari lawyers due to no evidence\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices against Tis Hazari lawyers due to no evidence.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-31T12:15:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-04T11:54:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/\",\"name\":\"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi HC discharges show cause notice against lawyers| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-31T12:15:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-04T11:54:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices against Tis Hazari lawyers due to no evidence\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi HC discharges show cause notice against lawyers| SCC Blog","description":"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices against Tis Hazari lawyers due to no evidence","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers","og_description":"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices against Tis Hazari lawyers due to no evidence.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-31T12:15:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-04T11:54:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/","name":"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi HC discharges show cause notice against lawyers| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-31T12:15:24+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-04T11:54:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Tis Hazari Controversy 2006: Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices against Tis Hazari lawyers due to no evidence","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/delhi-high-court-discharges-show-cause-notice-against-tis-hazari-lawyers-in-2006-violence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Sword of Damocles\u2019 has been hanging for the past 17 years; Delhi High Court discharges show cause notices in contempt case against Tis Hazari Lawyers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":229816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/19\/covid-19-tis-hazari-court-delhi-lawyers-litigants-and-others-not-to-use-saliva-while-affixing-court-fee-stamps\/","url_meta":{"origin":298163,"position":0},"title":"[COVID-19] Tis Hazari Court, Delhi: Lawyers, Litigants and others not to use saliva while affixing court fee stamps","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Office of the Districts & Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi issues a Circular dated 18th May, 2020 in view of the Coronavirus Pandemic with following directions: Lawyers\/Munshis\/Litigants\/Naib Courts\/Police Officials may be asked through court staff not to use saliva while affixing court fee stamps on the application\/petition and envelopes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296237,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/07\/firing-at-tis-hazari-court-bcd-suspends-advocate-incident-raises-serious-concern\/","url_meta":{"origin":298163,"position":1},"title":"Firing at Tis Hazari Court | BCD suspends one advocate; incident raises serious concern over security in District Courts","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Courts are not only the workplace for advocates and judges. Ordinary people visit courts with the hope of seeking justice through the law of the land, and incidents like Tis Hazari firing bring a lot of doubts among the visitors.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"firing at tis hazari court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/firing-at-tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/firing-at-tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/firing-at-tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/firing-at-tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/08\/tis-hazari-scuffle-anguished-hc-advises-responsible-representatives-of-advocates-and-police-to-convene-joint-meeting-and-make-sincere-efforts-to-sort-out-differences\/","url_meta":{"origin":298163,"position":2},"title":"Tis Hazari Scuffle | &#8216;Anguished&#8217; HC advises &#8216;responsible representatives&#8217; of Advocates and Police to convene joint meeting and make sincere efforts to sort out differences","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and C. Hari Shankar, J., clarified the earlier order dated 03-11-2019 passed in connection with the recent scuffle that took place at the Tis Hazari Courts Complex between Advocates and Police personals. In its order dated 03-11-2019, the High Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/04\/tis-hazari-court-violence-bar-council-of-india-appeals-to-advocates-of-the-country-to-resume-court-works-from-05-11-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":298163,"position":3},"title":"Tis Hazari Court Violence | Bar Council of India appeals to Advocates of the Country to resume Court works from 05-11-2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bar Council of India welcomes the historic order passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi thereby addressing the grievances espoused by the Bar Council of India and Lawyers of Delhi regarding the unfortunate incident of police excesses against advocates of Tis Hazari Court on 02-11-2019. The Bar Council\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/photograph-of-summons-sent-through-whatsapp\/","url_meta":{"origin":298163,"position":4},"title":"Photograph of summons sent through WhatsApp as an addition to ordinary process would amount to Judicial Overreach? Del HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Amit Bansal, J., expressed that Just because the photograph of the summons were sent by the plaintiff to the defendant through WhatsApp cannot amount to overreaching the judicial system or running a parallel system with the judicial system. The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/13\/tis-hazari-territorial-jurisdiction-contract-only-exclusively-district-court-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":298163,"position":5},"title":"Tis Hazari Court| Contract between parties determines Territorial jurisdiction; Non-mentioning of words \u201conly\u201d or \u201cexclusively\u201d before name of place of jurisdiction immaterial","author":"Editor","date":"June 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Court, Delhi : Vinod Kumar Gautam, Additional District Judge, while addressing the matter regarding the question of territorial jurisdiction, has held that the territorial jurisdiction in a matter is determined based on the contract entered between the parties. In the case at hand where the plaintiff had sought\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298163\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}