{"id":298130,"date":"2023-07-31T15:30:00","date_gmt":"2023-07-31T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=298130"},"modified":"2023-08-02T18:55:15","modified_gmt":"2023-08-02T13:25:15","slug":"prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/b> In a case wherein the plaintiff, TTK Prestige Ltd. alleged that the defendant, Gupta Light House infringed the design of a cooker, registered in favour of the plaintiff, C. Hari Shankar, J.<\/b>, opined that the defendant’s pressure cookers were imitative of the suit designs and a clear case of piracy within the meaning of Section 22(1)<\/a> of the Designs Act, 2000<\/a> (‘Act’) existed. However, the Court further held that due to the expiry of the suit design in 2019, it was now in the public domain and there could be no judgment or decree restraining use of the suit design by anyone. Further, the Court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts against the defendant.<\/p>\n

Background<\/b><\/p>\n

The plaintiff pleaded infringement, by the defendant, of the design of a cooker, registered in favour of the plaintiff by the Design Office in the Patent Office. The certificate of registration certified that novelty resided in respect of the shape and configuration of the cooker. The plaintiff alleged that the design of the pressure cookers manufactured and sold by the defendant were obviously or fraudulently imitative of the registered suit designs, within the meaning of Section 22(1) of the Act and that, therefore, the defendant was guilty of design piracy.<\/p>\n

Comparison of the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s Pressure Handi Cookers<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n
\n

Plaintiff's Pressure Handi Cookers<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Defendant's Pressure Handi Cookers<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\"prestige        \"prestige<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\"prestige        \"prestige<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court noted that the plaintiff was the holder of valid registration for its cooker, granted on 13-12-2004. The Court observed that the certificate of registration clearly stated that novelty resided in the shape and configuration of the cooker and a glance at the cooker made it apparent that it did not bear the conventional shape of a cooker but had a bulging mid\/lower section, which was not ordinarily found in cookers. Thus, the design of the plaintiff’s cooker had clear distinctive eye appeal, which was one of the definitive criteria for entitlement to registration as a design.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that a comparison of the suit design with the defendant’s product, and also a comparison of the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s product themselves, made it clear that the design of the defendant’s product was imitative of the suit design and in the absence of any photograph or other representation of a pressure cooker bearing a design similar to the suit design, dating prior to 13-12-2004, it could not be said that the suit design was bad for prior publication. It was quite possible that, in view of the novelty of the suit design, other manufacturers had copied it.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the suit design had expired, by efflux of time, in 2019 and thus, the Court held that the counsel for the defendant was right in his submission that, due to the expiry, the suit design was now in the public domain and there could be no judgment or decree restraining use of the suit design by anyone at this point of time. However, the Court opined that the defendant’s pressure cookers were imitative of the suit designs and a clear case of piracy within the meaning of Section 22(1) of the Act existed.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the present suit was decreed by directing the defendant to render accounts by filing on affidavit the details of the earnings made by the defendant by sale of the pressure cookers bearing the impugned designs, from the beginning, duly certified by a Chartered Accountant. The Court further granted liberty to the plaintiff to proceed against the defendant for recovery of damages if it so chooses. The Court also held that the plaintiff shall also be entitled to actual costs of the present litigation and for the purpose of computation of costs, the matter would next be listed before the Taxation Officer of this Court on 29-8-2023.<\/p>\n

[TTK Prestige Ltd. v. Gupta Light House, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 4386<\/a>, Order dated 24-7-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Plaintiff: Manish Kr. Mishra, Akansha Singh, Saloni Kasliwal, Advocates;<\/p>\n

For the Defendant: Kunal Khanna, Manish Singhal, Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The defendant’s pressure cookers are imitative of the suit designs of the plaintiff and the case of piracy under Section 22(1)<\/a> of the Designs Act, 2000<\/a> exists, but due to the expiry, the suit design is now in the public domain and there can be no judgment or decree restraining use of the suit design by anyone.”<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,59867,55195,47518,59866,59863,59864,59865,30217],"class_list":["post-298130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-design-piracy","tag-designs-act","tag-expiry","tag-gupta-light-house","tag-handi-cooker","tag-pressure-cooker","tag-prestige","tag-public-domain"],"yoast_head":"\nPrestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design expired; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design has expired but is entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design has expired but is entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-31T10:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-02T13:25:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design expired; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-31T10:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-02T13:25:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design has expired but is entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design expired; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi HC | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court held that Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design has expired but is entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design has expired but is entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-31T10:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-02T13:25:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design expired; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-31T10:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-02T13:25:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that Prestige cannot be granted permanent injunction as suit design has expired but is entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/prestige-cannot-be-granted-permanent-injunction-as-suit-design-expired-delhi-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No permanent injunction to Prestige after expiration of suit design; entitled to rendition of accounts against Gupta Light House: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309582,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/madras-high-court-injuncts-nirlon-kitchenware-from-infringing-passing-off-prestige-pressure-cookers\/","url_meta":{"origin":298130,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC injuncts Nirlon Kitchenware from infringing and passing off Prestige\u2019s lid from its Svachh series of pressure cookers","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that the lids were identical as the design was one and the same and added that the Prestige was in the market of manufacturing pressure cookers for a long time and their trade mark is well known and their turnover was huge","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/31\/dhc-restrains-manufacturers-from-using-trade-dress-identical-to-prestige-mark-for-its-pressure-cookers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":298130,"position":1},"title":"[Paristone v. Prestige] Delhi High Court restrains manufacturers from using trade dress identical to \u201cPRESTIGE\u201d mark for its pressure cookers","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThat defendants have chosen to imitate the manner in which plaintiff prints its logo is itself testimony to the goodwill and reputation of plaintiff, in the perception of defendant itself.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"paristone prestige pressure cookers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/paristone-prestige-pressure-cookers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/paristone-prestige-pressure-cookers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/paristone-prestige-pressure-cookers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/paristone-prestige-pressure-cookers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-filed-for-seeking-stay-of-proceedings-under-senior-citizens-act-due-to-pending-partition-proceedings-legal-news-research-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":298130,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court| Pendency of a partition suit by the son against his parents is no deterrent to the proceedings under Senior Citizens Act, 2007","author":"Arunima","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Senior Citizens have every right to protect themselves and in case of ill-treatment and abuse by their children\/ legal heirs, can approach the Maintenance Tribunal for their eviction from their property of any kind, which includes both Ancestral as well as Self Acquired Property.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/23\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-along-with-2-lakhs-damages-in-favour-of-ebay-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":298130,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction along with 2 lakhs damages in favour of eBay in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark \u2018Shopibay\u2019 which was similar to the plaintiff's mark \u2018eBay\/EBAY\u2019, the Single Judge Bench of Navin Chawla, J. granted permanent injunction to \u2018eBay\u2019 and held that the adoption of mark by the defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300723,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/04\/delhi-hc-imposes-rs-20-lakhs-damages-on-rogue-websites-for-illegally-streaming-brahmastra-fil-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":298130,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court imposes Rs. 20 lakhs damages on rogue websites for illegally streaming the film \u2018Brahmastra Part One: Shiva\u2019","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPiracy of cinematograph films is one of the biggest causes for losses in the film industry. Thus, various legislative steps have been taken to curb piracy and recently, amendments have been carried out in the Cinematograph Act, 1952 to deal with piracy in a much stricter manner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/del-hc-website-publishing-malicious-and-defamatory-articles-against-daniel-snyder-directed-to-take-down-such-articles\/","url_meta":{"origin":298130,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Website publishing malicious and defamatory articles against Daniel Snyder, directed to take down such articles","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J., granted ad-interim injunction and directed the meaww.com to take down defamatory and malicious articles against Daniel Snyder. Plaintiff sought exemption from filing the originals documents and attested affidavits in support of the plaint, statement of truth and the certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=298130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298130\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=298130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=298130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=298130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}