{"id":297619,"date":"2023-07-25T16:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-07-25T10:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=297619"},"modified":"2023-08-01T16:52:57","modified_gmt":"2023-08-01T11:22:57","slug":"whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/","title":{"rendered":"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/b> In an application under Section 482<\/a> of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) seeking to quash First Information Report (‘FIR’) for offences punishable under Sections 295-A<\/a> of Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’), 3(1)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (‘SC ST Act’), and 67-A<\/a> of Information Technology Act, 2000<\/a> (‘IT Act’), Vinay Joshi*<\/b> and Valmiki S.A. Menezes, JJ. rejected the same since the applicant indeed posted a WhatsApp status and investigation was underway.<\/p>\n

The informant in the instant matter complained that on 23-03-2023, he checked WhatsApp status wherein, the applicant had posed a question to be searched on Google. In pursuance of the same, the informant Google searched and noted the “objectionable material amounting to outraging the religious feeling of a Class” which was reported through the impugned FIR.<\/p>\n

The applicant explained the same to be seen by his saved contacts and not to harm the feelings of a particular group and opposed the application of provisions of SC ST Act or IT Act.<\/p>\n

The Court was of the view that WhatsApp status instigate others to do Google search and read what applicant intends. It further explained that “WhatsApp status can be a picture or video of what you are doing, thinking or something you have seen. By status you share is end-to-end in encrypted text, photo, video and updates that disappear after 24 hours. The very purpose of WhatsApp status is to convey something to his contacts.”<\/p>\n

The Court suggested that a person should behave with a sense of responsibility while communicating something to others and cannot justify the same through limited circulation. The Court viewed the contents of FIR as the applicant’s deliberate and malicious intention to insult the feelings of a group.<\/p>\n

The Court explained that the Court’s inherent powers under Section 482<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> must be exercised sparingly, carefully and with great caution, when the same is justified by the test specifically laid in the said provision. The Court did not find the instant case fit for invoking such powers since the investigation was still at the initial stage and the case carried no merits, and therefore rejected the instant application.<\/p>\n

[Kishor v. State of Maharashtra, 2023 SCC OnLine Bom 1515<\/a>, judgment dated 12-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Applicant: Advocate S.S. Dhengale;<\/p>\n

For Non-Applicant: Additional Public Prosecutor N.R. Rode, Advocate P.S. Wathore.<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A person should behave with a sense of responsibility while communicating something to others and cannot justify the same through limited circulation.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,38333,29912,59664],"class_list":["post-297619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-google-search","tag-sc-st-act","tag-whatsapp-status"],"yoast_head":"\nWhatsApp status: Bombay HC rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court rejected application for quashing FIR under SC\/ST Act and advocated for WhatsApp status to be communicated responsibly.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court rejected application for quashing FIR under SC\/ST Act and advocated for WhatsApp status to be communicated responsibly.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-25T10:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-01T11:22:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/\",\"name\":\"WhatsApp status: Bombay HC rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-25T10:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-01T11:22:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court rejected application for quashing FIR under SC\/ST Act and advocated for WhatsApp status to be communicated responsibly.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"bombay high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"WhatsApp status: Bombay HC rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act | SCC Blog","description":"Bombay High Court rejected application for quashing FIR under SC\/ST Act and advocated for WhatsApp status to be communicated responsibly.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act","og_description":"Bombay High Court rejected application for quashing FIR under SC\/ST Act and advocated for WhatsApp status to be communicated responsibly.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-25T10:30:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-01T11:22:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/","name":"WhatsApp status: Bombay HC rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-25T10:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-01T11:22:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Bombay High Court rejected application for quashing FIR under SC\/ST Act and advocated for WhatsApp status to be communicated responsibly.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"bombay high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/whatsapp-status-bombay-high-court-rejects-application-quashing-fir-under-sc-st-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"WhatsApp status should be communicated responsibly; Bombay High Court rejects application for quashing of FIR under SC\/ST Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":378755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/bombay-hc-sets-aside-16-year-old-case-against-lawyer\/","url_meta":{"origin":297619,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC sets aside 16-year-old case against lawyer, rules allegations fail to meet IPC and SC\/ST Atrocities Act requirements","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo attract Section 3(1)(r), Atrocities Act, the FIR or material on record needed to show that the petitioner intentionally insulted or intimidated the respondent and that he did so with the intent to humiliate the respondent at a place within public view.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"16-year-old case against lawyer","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/16-year-old-case-against-lawyer.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/16-year-old-case-against-lawyer.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/16-year-old-case-against-lawyer.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/16-year-old-case-against-lawyer.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332797,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/10\/bomhc-grants-relief-shiv-sena-leader-for-allegedly-making-utterances-against-female-journalist\/","url_meta":{"origin":297619,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC grants relief to Shiv Sena leader for allegedly making bizzare gestures\/utterances against a female journalist","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The exact gestures made by appellant are not reflected in the FIR statement, which merely alleges making of bizarre gestures and whether the gestures allegedly made by appellant fit into the expression \u201cgestures of a sexual nature\u201d is questionable at this stage.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":297619,"position":2},"title":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"There is sufficient material collected during investigation to indicate that the incident did take place and that slapping \u2018G\u2019 is an offence under Section 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324492,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/16\/bar-sanction-special-legislation-sc-st-atrocities-act-bombay-hc-legalnews\/","url_meta":{"origin":297619,"position":3},"title":"\u201cBar contained in S. 197, CrPC cannot be read into the provisions of a special legislation like SC\/ST Atrocities Act\u201d: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that no previous sanction as contemplated under S. 197 CrPC would be necessary for investigating and filing final report for offences under S. 509 IPC and S. 3 of the SC\/ST Atrocities Act, except for the offences punishable under S. 506 IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/12\/bar-of-anticipatory-bail-u-s-18-of-sc-st-act-not-applicable-on-application-u-s-482-of-bnss-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":297619,"position":4},"title":"Bar on grant of anticipatory bail under S. 18 SC\/ST Act not applicable when application filed under S. 482 of BNSS: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, two people met through jeevansathi.com and subsequently physical relations were formed on various occasions on the false pretext of marriage.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bar of anticipatory bail under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Bar-of-anticipatory-bail-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/26\/bombay-hc-quashes-sc-st-act-fir-against-tv-channel-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":297619,"position":5},"title":"Mere Reference to Caste Name Not an Offence Unless Used to Intentionally Insult or Humiliate: Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Marathi TV Channel Executives","author":"Ritu","date":"December 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"No specific allegation was made that the petitioners, who were not members of a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe, had intentionally undertaken an act to insult, intimidate or humiliate the first informant, who is a member of the scheduled caste.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"FIR Against TV Channel Executives","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/FIR-Against-TV-Channel-Executives.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297619\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}