{"id":297572,"date":"2023-07-25T10:00:21","date_gmt":"2023-07-25T04:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=297572"},"modified":"2023-07-28T17:28:42","modified_gmt":"2023-07-28T11:58:42","slug":"offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Gujarat High Court:<\/b> In a writ petition filed under Section 482<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) for quashing a First Information Report (‘FIR’) filed against the petitioner for offences under Section 323<\/a> and 506(2)<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’) and Sections 3(1)(r)<\/a>, 3(1)(s)<\/a> and 3(2)(va)<\/a> of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (‘SC and ST Act’), the Single Judge Bench of Sandeep N. Bhatt allowed the petition and quashed the impugned FIR against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the matter at hand, the petitioner and the complainant both are the elected members of the Chotila Nagarpalika on the symbol of BJP. There was an exchange of words between both the petitioner and the complainant as the complainant was going to cast his vote in favour of the Congress Party. The petitioner had humiliated the complainant in front of other elected members, including the women members of the Chotila Nagarpalika. Therefore, an FIR was registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 323<\/a> and 506(2)<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC and ST Act. Hence, the present petition was filed by the petitioner to quash the FIR filed against him.<\/p>\n

Court’s Decision<\/b><\/p>\n

Regarding the conduct of the complainant, the Court noted that the complainant approached the police station immediately after the incident, but he did not lodge the complaint at that time, the complaint was lodged 2 days after the incident. The Court said that the complainant waited for the direction of his higher authorities\/ representatives and at this juncture, certain questions were required to be considered, such as: Who were the complainant’s higher authorities\/representatives; Whose direction the complainant was following; Which was the actual advice; Why the complaint was not lodged on the same day; Was there any motivation to the complainant to lodge the impugned complaint at a belated stage, If yes, what was that motivation; Whether there was any ill-motive?<\/p>\n

The Court said that the action of the complainant- that he went to the police station but did not lodge the complaint created a doubt and tilted the balance in petitioner’s favour. The Court also said that the petitioner had complained to the higher authorities of the political party-BJP against the complainant and therefore, the complaint was a counterblast of this action. The Court also perused the relevant provisions of the SC and ST Act and said that the offence must be committed against the person who is a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, however in the present case the complainant was indeed a member of the Scheduled Tribe but there was no evidence to show that the offence was committed against the complainant with the intention that he was a member of the Scheduled Tribe. Further, the Court stated that “unless the investigation indicates or reveals the intention of a person not belonging to Scheduled Caste or Schedule Tribe to commit any of the offences under Section 3 of the SC and ST Act, in order to oppress or insult or humiliate or subjugate or ridicule a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe as such person merely belongs to that caste, the offence under Section 3 of the Act cannot be invoked.”<\/i><\/p>\n

The Court also added that if the motive for the crime is not a casteist attack, the person cannot be dragged for an offence under the SC and ST Act. While the Act is essentially meant for protecting the members of a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe from atrocity or oppression, at the same time, it cannot be allowed to be misused. It is a greater responsibility on the investigating officer to investigate such offence wisely and or very sharply and in a fair manner. Further, the Court said that even if it was accepted for a while that the alleged incident happened at a time when other members of the public were present, the question would still be; whether the petitioner committed the overt act with any intention to insult and intimidate the complainant on the account of he belonged to the scheduled tribe?<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court was of the view that allegations in the impugned FIR did not constitute criminal offence under the SC and ST Act. The Court also considered the conduct vis-à-vis the allegations vis-à-vis the political issues, that the complainant as well as the petitioner belonged to one political party – BJP and both were claiming the post of President of the Nagarpalika. But, since the party leaders chose the petitioner as a President, the complainant kept a grudge and filed the complaint after two days from the alleged incident. It was also noted that except the complainant, no one had lodged the complaint against the petitioner. Therefore, the Court said that under such circumstances, the impugned complaint was required to be quashed and set aside by exercising the powers under Section 482<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> in favour of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court conclusively said that with great pain it is noted that, many a time, the provisions of the SC and ST Act are being misused, some time by the complainant and or some time by the authorities concerned and the present case was one glaring example. Here the place of offence is a public place i.e., the office of the Nagarpalika, there was no concrete material against the petitioner in the entire investigation, which attracts the provisions of the SC and ST Act. The Court said that prima facie, the complaint against the petitioner seemed a politically motivated complaint. In such a situation, the sufferer would be the non-scheduled caste and non-scheduled tribe qua these provisions, by which damage is caused to fabric of social harmony in the society. Therefore, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned FIR.<\/p>\n

[Jivanbhai Nagjibhai Makwana v. State of Gujarat, 2023 SCC OnLine Guj 2306<\/a>, Decided on: 20-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner: Advocate Kunal S Shah;<\/p>\n

For the respondents: Assistant Public Prosecutor Soaham Joshi, Advocate Dhaval A Parmar.<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is essentially meant for protecting the members of a SC and ST from atrocity or oppression, however, it cannot be allowed to be misused.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":292951,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30179,59640,59641,52772,3096,11801,24914,59639,29912],"class_list":["post-297572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bjp","tag-casteist-attack","tag-chotila-nagarpalika","tag-gujarat-hc","tag-Gujarat_High_Court","tag-high-court","tag-motive","tag-offence-under-sc-and-st-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989","tag-sc-st-act"],"yoast_head":"\nOffence under SC and ST Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-25T04:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-28T11:58:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"860\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Offence under SC and ST Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-25T04:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-28T11:58:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp\",\"width\":860,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"gujarat high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Offence under SC and ST Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog","description":"Offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC","og_description":"Offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-25T04:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-28T11:58:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":860,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Offence under SC and ST Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-25T04:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-28T11:58:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Offence under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act attracted when motive was casteist attack: Gujarat HC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp","width":860,"height":590,"caption":"gujarat high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/offence-under-sc-and-st-act-attracted-when-motive-was-casteist-attack-gujarat-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cIf the Motive for Crime was Not a Casteist Attack, a Person Cannot Be Dragged for Offence Under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act\u201d: Gujarat HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/guj-hc-held-not-every-insult-offence-under-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":297572,"position":0},"title":"Gujarat High Court: Not every insult or intimidation amounts to an offence under SC ST Act","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFrom the allegations made in the complaint, the prosecution has not proved that the accused is guilty of an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"not every insult offence under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/08\/karnataka-hc-holds-sc-st-act-only-operative-when-intention-to-insult-present-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":297572,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka HC | Charges under Prevention of SC\/ ST (Atrocities) Act are applicable only when name of a victim’s caste is taken with the intention to insult and humiliate them","author":"Editor","date":"February 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Karnataka High Court held that merely mentioning an individual's caste during an altercation with no intention to insult, would not attract the provisions of the SC\/ ST Act","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-424.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":209005,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/guj-hc-bail-granted-to-accused-booked-under-sc-st-act-since-substantial-investigation-was-over-and-no-other-offence-was-registered\/","url_meta":{"origin":297572,"position":2},"title":"Guj HC | Bail granted to accused booked under SC\/ST Act since substantial investigation was over and no other offence was registered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: The Bench of S.H. Vora, J. allowed an appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 whereby the appellant\u2013original accused challenged the order passed by the Sessions Judge, whereby, the\u00a0 Sessions Judge had refused to grant anticipatory bail under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353876,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/19\/guj-hc-uphold-acquittal-in-sc-st-atrocities-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":297572,"position":3},"title":"Read why Gujarat HC upheld acquittal in SC\/ST Atrocity Case over absence of \u2018public view\u2019 and \u2018intentional insult\u2019","author":"Ekta","date":"July 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn an acquittal appeal if other view is possible, then also, the appellate court cannot merely substitute its view by reversing the acquittal into conviction, unless the findings of the trial Court are perverse, palpably wrong, manifestly erroneous or demonstrably unsustainable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"acquittal in SCST Atrocities case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/acquittal-in-SCST-Atrocities-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/acquittal-in-SCST-Atrocities-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/acquittal-in-SCST-Atrocities-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/acquittal-in-SCST-Atrocities-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":297572,"position":4},"title":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJust because the witnesses\u2019 statements do not disclose any overt act, that by itself would not be a ground to discharge the accused as law does not insist plenty of witnesses to prove an offence and the evidence of a solitary wholly reliable witness would suffice the purpose.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"charges under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/15\/ker-hc-plea-for-anticipatory-bail-rejected-in-view-of-s-18-of-sc-st-prevention-of-atrocities-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":297572,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Plea for anticipatory bail rejected in view of S. 18 of SC\/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Shircy V., J. dismissed this petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner, on 23-12-2019 at about 6 pm, wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant, who is a member of the SC and ST community, and even after knowing such fact,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297572"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297572\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}