{"id":297531,"date":"2023-07-24T13:30:03","date_gmt":"2023-07-24T08:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=297531"},"modified":"2023-07-29T09:33:32","modified_gmt":"2023-07-29T04:03:32","slug":"dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/b> A suit was filed by an army officer with a record of impeccable integrity for 36 years, challenging claims made in a media blitz launched that a bribe of Rs. 50,000\/- was paid to the plaintiff by defendant 4. Neena Bansal Krishna, J., awarded damages in the sum of Rs. 2,00,00,000\/- (Rupees Two Crores) to the plaintiff to be paid by defendants 1 to 4 for having caused defamation, along with the costs of the suit as the plaintiff not only faced a lowering of estimation in the eyes of public but his character also got maligned with serious allegations of corruption which no subsequent refutation can redress or heal. However, the Court dismissed the suit against defendants 5 to 7 as the plaintiff has not been able to prove any act of defamation on the part of defendants 5 to 7.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff was working as Addl. Director General, Ordnance Services (Technical Stores) in Army Head Quarters and was responsible for overseeing the functioning of Central Depots for Technical Stores, ammunition and procurement of indigenous equipment primarily for ex-Directorate General Ordnance Factory and Public Sector Undertakings. The plaintiff has claimed that he was involved in the processing of cases for import of main equipment or the selection which is neither handled by the Additional Director General, Weapons and Equipment (ADG WE) nor has he got any specialized knowledge or any role in the introduction and import of new equipment.<\/p>\n

Defendant 2, the proprietor of defendant 1 portal Tehelka.Com was responsible for managing the release of news items\/ articles on the website of Tehelka.Com. A media blitz was launched on 13-03-2001 carrying a story about the alleged corruption in the defence deals relating to the import of new defence equipment. The story was done and recorded by two Reporters namely Defendants 3 and 4, allegedly working undercover by representing themselves on behalf of a fictitious defence equipment Firm based in London keen to introduce new defence equipment in the Indian Army. Defendant 7, which is a news and entertainment channel available through Cable TV networks, allegedly telecasted selective video pictures of the Army officers, other civilian officers working in the Ministry of Defence and politicians allegedly involved in corruption in defence deals relating to the import of defence equipment along with selective transcript showing that all the persons referred had taken money to do the work for the fictitious firm based in West End, London, which subsequently featured in various newspapers as well.<\/p>\n

The conversations and the transcript of the conversations had been released selectively to highlight that the officers and politicians involved in the import of defence equipment and purchases were amenable to inducement, bribe, and corruption to help the so-called fictitious Firm to obtain the purchase orders and introduce them in the Indian Army. One of the interstitial transcripts recorded that a bribe of Rs. 50,000\/- was paid to the plaintiff by defendant No.4 in the presence of Lt. Col. Sayal.<\/p>\n

“Our next meeting with Gen Ahluwalia takes place 10-days later. Here he accepts a token bribe of Rs. 50,000\/- which is never delivered to him.” And it was further stated: “Sayal goes near Ahluwalia and tried to hand Rs. 50,000\/- which he accepts later.”<\/span><\/p>\n

On the aspect whether the plaintiff has been defamed as a consequent of the actions of the defendants, the Court stated that the plaintiff has claimed defamation by two sets of defendants; namely, defendants 1 to 4 who had conducted the Operation West End<\/i> and recorded the interview of the plaintiff and other Army Officers, and the other set of defendants is Defendant 5 to 7 to whom the Telecast rights were sold by defendant 1to 4, who telecasted them on their news channels.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that from the admissions in the cross-examination, it is evident that there was neither any demand made by the plaintiff nor any money was paid despite which the transcript contains the comments to this effect from defendant 3 which are proved to be not authentic and genuine, but a figment of imagination\/ impression of defendant 3. The plaintiff was a man holding the position of Major General in the Army and was a man of repute. There cannot be worse defamation and disrepute to a person of integrity and honour than a false imputation of him having demanded and then accepted bribe of Rs. 50,000. There was wide publicity of this transcript which was admittedly put on the website of Tehelka.com, Defendant 1. and it continued to remain on their website<\/p>\n

Thus, based on the evidence on record and the admissions made on behalf of defendants 1 to 4, establishes a case of defamation against the plaintiff, entitling him to damages.<\/p>\n

On the aspect of the quantum of damages payable to the plaintiff, the Court observed that no action lies for mere vulgar abuse, or for words that have inflicted no substantial injury as espoused in the maxim, de minimnis non curat lex.<\/i> Whenever words are per se defamatory and on an invasion of a right (as of reputation) on their face, no inquiry is allowed into the character of actual harm suffered and no further proof of damages is required. This class of defamation is actionable per se; i.e. they invade a simple or absolute right. On proof of publication of such words and in the absence of any defence, the plaintiff must recover at least nominal damages for the injury to his reputation caused by the defendant, whether such injury was malicious or accidental, although malice may be shown to entitle him to increased damages.<\/p>\n

Considering that much time has passed and the plaintiff has already lived with ill fame for more than 23 years along with the enormity of the nature of defamation, an apology is not only inadequate but is meaningless.<\/b> Thus, the Court awarded Rs. 1,00,00,000\/- (one crore) as damages payable by the defendant 1 to 4, as the rights to the Tapes had been assigned to defendants 5 to 7 for Rs. 50 lakhs by defendants 1 to 4 in the year 2000.<\/p>\n

[Major General MS Ahluwalia v. Tehelka.com, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 4275<\/a>, decided on 21-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Chetan Anand and Mr. Akash Srivastava, Advocates for the Plaintiff;<\/p>\n

Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivesh B. Saharya, Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Ms. Palak, advocates for D-1 to D-4 Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Petal Chandhok, Ms. Mimansi Sethi, Advocates for the D-5 to D-7.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court observed that the plaintiff was a man holding the position of Major General in the Army and was a man of repute. There cannot be worse defamation and disrepute to a person of integrity and honour than a false imputation of him having demanded and then accepted bribe of Rs. 50,000.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[59600,3622,2543,59601,59602,37130,42899],"class_list":["post-297531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-army-officer","tag-defamation","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-major-general","tag-ms-ahluwalia","tag-tarun-tejpal","tag-tehelka"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC directs Tehelka & Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 cr to Major General for defamation| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directs Tehelka and Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 crores as compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directs Tehelka and Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 crores as compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-24T08:00:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-29T04:03:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC directs Tehelka & Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 cr to Major General for defamation| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-24T08:00:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-29T04:03:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court directs Tehelka and Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 crores as compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC directs Tehelka & Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 cr to Major General for defamation| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court directs Tehelka and Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 crores as compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit","og_description":"Delhi High Court directs Tehelka and Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 crores as compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-24T08:00:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-29T04:03:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/","name":"Delhi HC directs Tehelka & Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 cr to Major General for defamation| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-24T08:00:03+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-29T04:03:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court directs Tehelka and Tarun Tejpal to pay 2 crores as compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/dhc-directs-tehelka-compensation-major-general-army-officer-defamation-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court orders Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal to pay Rs. 2 crore compensation to a Major General in a defamation suit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/03\/tehelka-founder-tarun-tejpal-granted-regular-bail-in-sexual-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":297531,"position":0},"title":"Tehelka founder Tarun Tejpal granted regular bail in sexual assault case","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 3, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Tehelka founder, Tarun Tejpal who was out on interim bail to attend his mother\u2019s funeral was granted regular bail by a bench comprising of H.L. Dattu and S. A. Bobde, JJ. . Tejpal, who was arrested in November last year for molesting and sexually assaulting his female colleague,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218366,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/19\/sc-rejects-tarun-tejpals-plea-for-quashing-sexual-assault-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":297531,"position":1},"title":"SC rejects Tarun Tejpal’s plea for quashing sexual assault charges","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Arun Mishra and MR Shah, JJ has refused to quash the charges against Tarun Tejpal, former editor-in-chief of Tehelka Magazine, in the 2013 sexual assault case registered by his former junior colleague. The Court also directed that the trial is to be concluded in a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/17\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-can-allegations-of-corruption-against-judges-be-made-publicly-sc-frames-larger-questions\/","url_meta":{"origin":297531,"position":2},"title":"Prashant Bhushan – Tehelka Contempt| Can allegations of corruption against Judges be made publicly? SC frames larger questions","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: After it refused to accept the explanation of advocate Prashant Bhushan in the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, BR Gavai and MR Shah, JJ has framed larger questions in the matter that will have far-reaching\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233675,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-sc-refuses-to-accept-advocate-bhushans-explanation-in-2009-case-says-further-hearing-required\/","url_meta":{"origin":297531,"position":3},"title":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| SC refuses to accept advocate Bhushan’s explanation in 2009 case; says further hearing required","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra, J refused to accept the explanation of advocate Bhushan and said that further hearing is required in the matter. \"Before reaching to any finding whether the statement made\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/04\/prashant-bhushan-tehelka-contempt-we-seek-to-balance-freedom-of-speech-the-need-to-protect-the-dignity-of-the-court-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":297531,"position":4},"title":"Prashant Bhushan-Tehelka Contempt| We seek to balance freedom of speech & the need to protect the dignity of the Court: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the 2009 contempt petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka Tarun Tejpal, the bench headed by Arun Mishra, J said that there is a thin line between freedom of speech and the need to protect the dignity of the judiciary as an institution and it sought\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/del-hc-rejects-defamation-suit-against-netflix-series-bads-of-bollywood\/","url_meta":{"origin":297531,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC rejects Sameer Wankhede’s defamation suit against Netflix web series Ba***ds of Bollywood for want of jurisdiction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 31, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAn unqualified application of Section 19\u2026 would defeat the object of the provision, and open the door to forum shopping, libel tourism, and luxury litigation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Netflix series Bads of Bollywood","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297531\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}