{"id":297427,"date":"2023-07-21T16:00:52","date_gmt":"2023-07-21T10:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=297427"},"modified":"2023-07-26T15:26:12","modified_gmt":"2023-07-26T09:56:12","slug":"initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Madras High Court:<\/b> In a second appeal filed by the wife under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523683\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">100<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;), to set aside the order passed by the District Judge, wherein the Court allowed the husband&#8217;s petition seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion, R.Vijayakumar, J. has opined that the divorce petition lacks pleadings with regard to the mental cruelty, desertion. The litigation initiated by the wife is only to protect her property rights and her custody of her son. When the initiation of such proceedings is for the vindication of her rights, the said proceedings can never be considered to be a ground for mental cruelty. Thus, the Court set aside the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court and restored the judgment and decree of the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p><b>Background<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the case at hand, the appellant had got married to the respondent on 14-09-1987. In the divorce petition it was alleged that the wife was leading an adulterous life. The husband filed a petition seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The said petition was dismissed by the Trial Court. However, the First Appellate Judge after re-appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, has allowed the appeal and granted a decree for divorce. Thus, the wife filed this present appeal.<\/p>\n<p><b>Analysis<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After perusing the divorce petition, the Court said that it indicates that the husband and wife are residing in the same address even on the date of filing of the divorce petition. Therefore, the husband has not come forward to place on record on what date the wife had left the matrimonial home and where she was residing for the past 10 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of the Explanation to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> that provides the meaning for desertion, as desertion of the spouse by the other spouse without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of such spouse. It includes willful neglect of the spouse by the other spouse.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that even after initiation of civil and criminal Court proceedings, the wife had never left the matrimonial home and she continues to reside there even today. Only the husband had left the matrimonial home and was alleged to have contracted a second marriage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the husband has suppressed the fact that he is residing away from the matrimonial home in his divorce petition. Even the First Appellate Court has recorded a finding that the husband has not mentioned the date of desertion. However, the First Appellate Court has proceeded to grant a decree for divorce on the ground of desertion that the husband was forced to leave the matrimonial home due to mental cruelty caused to him. As per the Court, there is no reason to the effect that the husband was forced to leave the matrimonial home due to the mental cruelty of the wife. Therefore, the Court set aside the finding of the First Appellate Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the contention relating to house property, the Court said that the husband has not challenged the decree that was granted in favour of the wife with regard to the building. Therefore, the husband has conceded the title of the wife over the building. Thus, filing a suit against the husband was not without any basis, thereby causing mental cruelty to the husband. Further, the Court said that filing of petition by the wife to protect her custodial rights cannot be considered to be mental cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the second marriage of the husband, the Court noted that the wife has given details of the second wife&#8217;s name, the date and place of the marriage and address of the second wife. However, the criminal proceedings initiated by the wife for the offence of bigamy has ended in acquittal. The order of acquittal has not been placed on record to identify whether the husband has been acquitted on benefit of doubt or on the ground that a false allegation has been made against him. Therefore, filing of the above cases by the wife cannot be considered to be a mental cruelty caused by her to the husband. In fact, the husband has made a serious allegation of adultery as against the wife and despite being unsuccessful before the criminal Court, he had chosen to repeat the same allegation in the divorce proceedings. Therefore, the Court said that the finding of the First Appellate Court that the attitude of the wife is to harass her husband by filing one petition after another, is not legally sustainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the First Appellate Court was not right in blaming the wife for not filing any application for restitution of conjugal rights after arriving at a finding that the husband has miserably failed to prove the allegation of adultery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Chandra v. Selvaraj, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2Vq1I6V3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Mad 4585<\/a>, decided on 12-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Appellant: Advocate E.R. Kumaresan;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondent: Advocate A.N. Ramanathan.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>When the husband had left the matrimonial home and he is residing away and there is an allegation of second marriage on the husband, the wife cannot be blamed for not taking steps to restore the conjugal rights<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":290498,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3650,3594,2570,59561,3060,2846,4031,2567,38590],"class_list":["post-297427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adultery","tag-bigamy","tag-Cruelty","tag-custodial-rights","tag-Desertion","tag-divorce","tag-hindu-marriage-act","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-property-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights not mental cruelty: Madras High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights is not mental cruelty\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights is not mental cruelty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-21T10:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-26T09:56:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights not mental cruelty: Madras High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-21T10:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-26T09:56:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights is not mental cruelty\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"madras high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights not mental cruelty: Madras High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights is not mental cruelty","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers","og_description":"Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights is not mental cruelty","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-21T10:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-26T09:56:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/","name":"Initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights not mental cruelty: Madras High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-21T10:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-26T09:56:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights is not mental cruelty","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"madras high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/initiation-proceedings-wife-vindication-her-rights-not-mental-cruelty-madras-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can initiation of proceedings by wife for vindication of her rights considered to be mental cruelty? Madras High Court answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":248536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/21\/decree-of-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":297427,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | 25 long years of separation, but no decree of divorce granted \u2013 Why? Read whether HC dissolves the marriage or not","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: T. Raja, J., in the present matter while considering the long separation of parties for almost a quarter-century, granted a decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the parties. Factual Matrix In the present matter, appellant was married to the respondent and a male child was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/desertion-and-cruelty-by-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":297427,"position":1},"title":"Wife leaves matrimonial home and never returns after several requests and legal notice under S. 9 of HMA, alleges husband of several cruelties without any evidence: Would it amount to desertion and cruelty by wife? Del HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Noting the separation of 12 years between the husband and wife, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., found that the wife had subjected the husband to desertion and cruelty, hence decree of divorce be granted. An appeal was filed challenging the decision wherein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/16\/tripura-hc-what-amounts-to-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage-hc-discusses-in-case-where-the-couple-lived-apart-for-13-continuous-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":297427,"position":2},"title":"Tripura HC | What amounts to irretrievable breakdown of marriage? HC discusses in a case where the couple lived apart for 13 continuous years","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S. Talapatra and S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ., upheld the decision of the trial court and stated that the present matter is a case of an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage in light of cruelty and desertion. Cruelty & Desertion | Dissolution of Marriage Allegations of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/16\/respondent-cant-seek-declaration-of-petitioners-second-marriage-as-void-as-counter-claim-in-a-divorce-proceeding-relief-cant-be-prayed-qua-third-party-under-section-23a-hma-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":297427,"position":3},"title":"Respondent can&#8217;t seek declaration of petitioner&#8217;s &#8220;second marriage&#8221; in a divorce proceeding; Relief can&#8217;t be prayed qua third party under Section 23A HMA: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, the relief of divorce, judicial separation etc. can be between the husband and the wife only and cannot extend to the third party.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/30\/utt-hc-wife-not-eligible-for-medical-examination-of-whether-she-can-conceive-or-not-during-divorce-proceedings-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":297427,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Wife not eligible for medical examination of whether she can conceive or not during Divorce proceedings; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":64371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/29\/past-acts-of-cruelty-after-condonation-are-not-a-ground-to-seek-divorce-unless-revived-by-later-acts-of-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":297427,"position":5},"title":"Past acts of cruelty after condonation, are not a ground to seek divorce, unless revived by later acts of cruelty","author":"Saba","date":"August 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court's order dismissing the appellant husband's petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty, the Court observed that the law pertaining to cruelty is if by resuming cohabitation the spouse claiming victim of cruelty forgives the other spouse who commits\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297427\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290498"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}