{"id":296915,"date":"2023-07-15T16:00:54","date_gmt":"2023-07-15T10:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=296915"},"modified":"2023-07-20T12:28:28","modified_gmt":"2023-07-20T06:58:28","slug":"delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/","title":{"rendered":"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Rouse Avenue Court, Delhi:<\/b> An appeal was filed by X (victim) under Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act, 2013 challenging the order passed by the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) constituted by Standard Chartered Bank (respondent 4) for enquiring into a case of Sexual Harassment against her by an employee of M\/S Standard Chartered Bank under whom the employee had worked. Ajay Goel, J., held that the findings of ICC suffer from illegality and infirmity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The main grievance of the appellant is, though the respondent was found to be guilty of sexual harassment by the Internal Committee in its finding report, the Internal Committee was silent on any penalty or punishment to be awarded to the Respondent in view of Section 13 and 15 of the POSH Act and no recommendations were given to the Standard Chartered Bank as per the POSH Act for further actions to be taken by the Bank against the Respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The other grievances were pertaining to the functioning of the Internal Committee and with regard to the practice adopted by the Internal Committee which was against all principles of natural justice and further that the Internal Committee had permitted anonymous witnesses one brought by the respondent and the other by the Internal Committee itself to give evidence without disclosing the names of the anonymous witnesses despite objections and protests from the victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that sexual harassment is the expression of unhealthy human relationships and ICC is a fact-finding body that gives recommendations on allegations of sexual harassment at workplaces. The very object of the statute is to provide speedy and hassle-free remedy to the victims which is devoid of procedural complexities and rigors of courts and tribunals. However, in the present case respondent 4 never tried to go into the roots of the incident and neither was any recording made, nor any grievances of the appellant were paid any heed to by respondent 4.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that biased, partial, and one-sided behaviour of the internal committee was well depicted by the fact that the appellant was asked to share questions for cross-examination in advance and when this practice was objected by the appellant, the committee justified it by saying that respondent is not comfortable in cross-examination without having questions in writing in advance. Such conduct is totally against the principles of natural justice and any anonymous witness cannot be permitted to be produced in the inquiry under POSH Act and the practice followed by ICC, thus, in the present case ICC was prejudicial and biased towards the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the victims for this reason are afraid of filing cases\/complaints of sexual harassment on account of their image being tarnished in the workplace as well as outside and victims become the topic of discussion and it becomes almost impossible for such victim to work in such environment and rather eyed with suspicion. Even the organization\/employer remains reluctant to entertain such complaints and endeavours to avoid such cases for the sake of their reputation.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the Court laid down following observations:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>When a complaint is filed by a woman employee, it should be promptly looked into and an enquiry should be made by the Internal Committee within a reasonable period of time.<\/li>\n<li>The safety mechanism should be evolved to ensure that the women employees can express their concern to a suitable higher officer.<\/li>\n<li>The social welfare department should focus on creating awareness and promoting education about sexual harassment, consent, gender equality and respectful behaviour. This can be done through campaigns, workshops and training programs targeting both men and women.<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">the department should work towards implementing and enforcing stringent laws that protect women from sexual harassment. This includes reviewing and amending existing laws, if necessary, to ensure they are comprehensive and effective. Additionally, ensuring timely and fair investigation and prosecution of reported case is crucial.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court directed respondent 3 to pay Rs 1,50,000\/- with an unconditional apology which has been already tendered and accepted. The Court has also directed a sum of Rs 50,000\/- to be paid by the Standard Chartered Bank to the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. Internal Committee, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8eY2Sj5j\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Dis Crt (Del) 13<\/a>, decided on 06-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 4%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 2%;\">The error in the previous version stating that &#8220;<i>Thus, the Court directed respondent 3 to pay Rs 1,50,000\/- and a sum of Rs 50,000\/- to be paid by the Standard Chartered Bank to the appellant and an unconditional apology<\/i>.&#8221; is deeply regretted.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Delhi Court observed that it is crucial for Delhi Commission for Women to focus on substantive actions rather than superficial gestures just for the sake of publicity and bringing the name in newspaper or to find fault in the other institution when equal responsibility lies with them also.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":296926,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4721],"tags":[59375,43378,59373,59374,45700,4251,31870,44522,59372,44391,51099,2850,3543],"class_list":["post-296915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-district-court","tag-anonymous-witness","tag-apology","tag-dcw","tag-delhi-commission-for-women","tag-delhi-court","tag-icc","tag-industrial-tribunal","tag-internal-complaints-committee","tag-litigation-cost","tag-posh","tag-rouse-avenue","tag-sexual_harassment","tag-Standard_Chartered_Bank"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi Court directs litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi Court directs 1,50,000 as litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi Court directs 1,50,000 as litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-15T10:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-20T06:58:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi Court directs litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-15T10:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-20T06:58:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi Court directs 1,50,000 as litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"rouse avenue court, delhi\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi Court directs litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions.","description":"Delhi Court directs 1,50,000 as litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee","og_description":"Delhi Court directs 1,50,000 as litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-15T10:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-20T06:58:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/","name":"Delhi Court directs litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-15T10:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-20T06:58:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi Court directs 1,50,000 as litigation costs to Standard Chartered Bank for its non compliance of POSH provisions","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"rouse avenue court, delhi"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276542,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/posh-delhi-high-court-baffling-to-see-that-a-law-graduate-himself-demands-assistance-of-person-with-legal-background-for-enquiry-before-icc\/","url_meta":{"origin":296915,"position":0},"title":"[POSH] Delhi High Court | Baffling to see that a law graduate himself demands assistance of person with legal background for enquiry before Internal Complaints Committee","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"If the Court would allow such an interpretation, then this provision would become redundant, and a floodgate of law graduates, who may not be enrolled with the bar councils to become an \u2018advocate\u2019 but are still practicing law, would pour in. The purpose of keeping the proceedings fact-based and free\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270774,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/whether-s-5-limitation-act-1963-apply-to-appeals-under-s-18-of-posh-act-2013-delhi-high-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":296915,"position":1},"title":"Whether S. 5 Limitation Act, 1963 apply to appeals under S. 18 of POSH Act, 2013? Delhi High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: C Hari Shankar, J. opined that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 will apply in respect of appeals preferred under Section 18 Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal), Act 2013 (\u2018POSH Act') because if a Court were to refuse to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/27\/law-on-posh-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":296915,"position":2},"title":"POSH Act | Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committee and Local Committee: Detailed account of Delhi HC decision revolving around case of aggrieved women herself terminated from services","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Noting allegations against an employer with regard to the sexual harassment Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., expressed that, \u201c\u2026instead of providing assistance to the aggrieved woman in prosecuting her complaint of sexual harassment, the Akademi has been opposing her tooth and nail and has even terminated her services pending\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":360481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/supreme-court-kerala-hc-political-parties-not-workplace-posh-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":296915,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court upholds Kerala HC Verdict: Political Parties are not workplace and not liable to constitute Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court upheld the Kerala HC decision that political parties are not legally obligated to establish an Internal Complaints Committee under the POSH Act, because there is no employer-employee relationship among the members of political parties, and they do not meet the criteria of a \"workplace\" as defined under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Political Parties not workplace","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Political-Parties-not-workplace.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Political-Parties-not-workplace.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Political-Parties-not-workplace.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Political-Parties-not-workplace.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352556,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/05\/delhi-hc-launches-sexual-harassment-complaint-portal\/","url_meta":{"origin":296915,"position":4},"title":"Empowering Women at Work: Delhi High Court Launches Portal for Workplace Sexual Harassment Complaints","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The portal is meant to provide a dedicated platform for filing and addressing complaints of sexual harassment of women within the precincts of the Delhi High Court in a safe, secure, and confidential manner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi HC Portal for Workplace Sexual Harassment Complaints","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-05T201607.430.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-05T201607.430.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-05T201607.430.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-05T201607.430.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240995,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/del-hc-can-internal-complaints-committee-make-comments-on-personal-conduct-of-parties-read-what-hc-says-about-moral-policing-and-consensual-relationships\/","url_meta":{"origin":296915,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Can Internal Complaints Committee make comments on personal conduct of parties? Read what HC says about &#8216;Moral Policing&#8217; and &#8216;Consensual Relationships&#8217;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Pratibha M. Singh, J., observed that: Complaints of sexual harassment are initially filed with enormous reluctance. The power of the ICC to hold the enquiry and give a report ought to be within the scheme and the four corners of the statute itself. In the instant petition,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296915","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296915"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296915\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/296926"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}