{"id":296879,"date":"2023-07-15T10:00:08","date_gmt":"2023-07-15T04:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=296879"},"modified":"2023-07-15T10:02:40","modified_gmt":"2023-07-15T04:32:40","slug":"appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/b> An appeal challenging the Dalhousie Civil Court Order based on application of Section (‘S.’) 10<\/a> of Civil Procedure Code<\/a> (‘CPC’) had been dismissed and the Civil Court order had been upheld by a Single Judge Bench of Sandeep Sharma<\/b>* on the grounds of it failing to comply with the test laid down by S. 10<\/a> of CPC<\/a>. The court reiterated that to attract the case of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10<\/a> of CPC<\/a> the whole of subject matter in both the proceedings should be identical.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/b> In the case at hand, a civil petition was filed by the plaintiff before the Delhi High Court to seek partition of properties in Dalhousie, decree of declaration in her favour that she is the joint share holder of all the estate left behind by late Col. P.D. Chopra to the extent of 1\/8th share and to render full accounts of profits derived from properties by the defendants. However, before the above-mentioned suit could be heard and decided, plaintiff filed another civil suit in Dalhousie Court for declaration that plaintiff and defendants are legal heirs to P.C. Chopra and are lessees in possession.<\/p>\n

Pursuant to the latter case, the defendant filed a case of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10<\/a> of CPC<\/a> before the Civil Court at Dalhousie on the ground that the suit filed before Delhi HC is ‘directly and substantially in issue’ in the suit filed at Dalhousie. However, the said petition was dismissed by the Dalhousie Court and it refused to stay the plaintiff’s suit at Dalhousie.<\/p>\n

Case Analysis:<\/b> The Himachal Pradesh High Court relied on National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Science<\/i> v. C. Parameshwara<\/i> and Aspi Jal<\/i> v. Khushroo Rustum Dady Burjor<\/i> and concluded that for operation of S. 10<\/a> CPC<\/a>, entire subject matter of the two suits should be the same. Provisions of S. 10<\/a> CPC<\/a> will not apply if a few matters in issue are common rather, same would apply if entire subject matter in controversy is same.<\/p>\n

The court further observed that the purpose behind S. 10<\/a> of CPC<\/a> is to avoid two parallel trials on the same issue by two Courts and to avoid recording of conflicting findings on issues which are directly and substantially in issue in previously instituted suit. The fundamental test to check is whether on final decision being reached in the previous suit, such decision would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.<\/p>\n

The court further focussed on the keywords mentioned under S. 10, ‘directly and substantially in issue’ and opined that “directly and substantially in issue” are used in contra-distinction to the words “incidentally or collaterally in issue”. Therefore, Section 10 would apply only if there is identity of the matter in issue in both the suits i.e., the whole of subject matter in both the proceedings is identical.<\/p>\n

Applying these principles, court differentiated between the suit filed at Delhi High Court and Dalhousie court, where the former concerned with partition of land and the latter with Will by P.C. Chopra and lease deed. Therefore, the Hon’ble Justice while remarking that “If plaints filed in different courts are read juxtaposing each other it cannot be concluded that similar and identical issues are involved in both the cases” dismissed the petition and upheld the Dalhousie Civil Court order.<\/p>\n

[Ashok Lal Chopra v. Mrs. Kiran Kapoor, CMPMO No. 418 of 2020, Decided on 27-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Judgement By: Justice Sandeep Sharma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel for Petitioner: Senior Advocate Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate D.S. Verma;<\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondents: Advocate Nimish Gupta.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If plaint filed in different courts are read juxtaposing each other it cannot be concluded that similar and identical issues are involved in both the cases.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":292797,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[51575,2929,59349,5353,59347,59348],"class_list":["post-296879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-concurrent-jurisdiction","tag-Himachal_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-identical-issues","tag-res-judicata","tag-s-10-of-cpc","tag-two-trials"],"yoast_head":"\nAppeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dimissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed the appeal raising issue of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10 as it failed to comply with the fundamental test of attracting the section i.e., issues involved in both the suits are identical and decision reached in the previous suit, would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed the appeal raising issue of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10 as it failed to comply with the fundamental test of attracting the section i.e., issues involved in both the suits are identical and decision reached in the previous suit, would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-15T04:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-15T04:32:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dimissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-15T04:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-15T04:32:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed the appeal raising issue of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10 as it failed to comply with the fundamental test of attracting the section i.e., issues involved in both the suits are identical and decision reached in the previous suit, would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"himachal pradesh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dimissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","description":"Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed the appeal raising issue of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10 as it failed to comply with the fundamental test of attracting the section i.e., issues involved in both the suits are identical and decision reached in the previous suit, would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed the appeal raising issue of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10 as it failed to comply with the fundamental test of attracting the section i.e., issues involved in both the suits are identical and decision reached in the previous suit, would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-15T04:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-15T04:32:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","name":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dimissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-15T04:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-15T04:32:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed the appeal raising issue of concurrent jurisdiction under S. 10 as it failed to comply with the fundamental test of attracting the section i.e., issues involved in both the suits are identical and decision reached in the previous suit, would operate as res-judicata in the subsequent suit.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"himachal pradesh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/delhi-hc-power-transfer-proceedings-between-high-courts-is-exclusively-vested-in-the-sc-u-s25-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":296879,"position":0},"title":"Power to transfer proceedings between High Courts u\/s 25 of CPC is exclusively vested in Supreme Court: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Delhi High Court cannot exercise power to transfer proceedings between two separate High Courts as the said power of transfer between two High Courts, can be exercised in terms of Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, by only the Supreme Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-revocation-petition-u-s-64-patents-act-is-not-a-suit-within-the-meaning-s10-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":296879,"position":1},"title":"Revocation Petition under Section 64 of Patents Act is not a suit within the meaning of Section 10 of CPC: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court cannot create a deeming fiction on its own, where the statute does not do so. In the absence of any provision which deems a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act to be a suit, a Court cannot, even in the interests of expediency, so hold.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/hp-hc-scope-of-interference-by-high-court-in-second-appeal-under-s-100-of-cpc-is-only-if-a-substantial-question-of-law-involved-in-appeal-appeal-dismissed-as-no-perversity-in-earlier-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":296879,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Scope of interference by High Court in Second Appeal under S. 100 of CPC is only if a substantial question of law involved; Appeal dismissed as no perversity in earlier orders","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed the appeal on finding no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. Factual matrix of the case was that the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of a certain amount along with the interest rate; the contract was based on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/07\/s-149-cpc-acts-as-an-exception-or-even-a-proviso-to-s-4-of-court-fees-act-1870-supreme-court-reiterates-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":296879,"position":3},"title":"Section 149 CPC acts as an exception, or even a proviso to Section 4 of Court Fees Act ,1870; Supreme Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court reiterated that in terms of Section 4, an appeal cannot be filed before a High Court without court fee, if the same is prescribed. But this provision must be read along with Section 149 of CPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-308.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":286798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/13\/section-24-25-cpc-transfer-suit-appeal-other-proceedings-common-high-court-gauhati-nagaland-supreme-court-power-inter-state-transfer-scope-legal-explainer-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":296879,"position":4},"title":"Explained| Inter-State transfer of suit, appeal or other proceedings: Supreme Court\u2019s power under Section 25 CPC versus Common High Courts\u2019 power under Section 24 CPC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court settled the issue relating to the scope and ambit of Section 24 vis-\u00e0-vis section 25 of the CPC that arose in view of the peculiar circumstances relating to transfer of a suit wherein two States share a common High Court as provided under Article 231 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Common High Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-719.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-719.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-719.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-719.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271106,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":296879,"position":5},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision under Order XLVII Rule 9 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC), a review of an order passed in a review petition is not maintainable. A\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296879\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}