{"id":296498,"date":"2023-07-11T15:00:57","date_gmt":"2023-07-11T09:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=296498"},"modified":"2023-07-13T18:26:01","modified_gmt":"2023-07-13T12:56:01","slug":"article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shehla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/b> The five Judge Constitution Bench comprising of Dr. DY Chandrachud CJ., Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai, and Surya Kant, JJ., discussed on the completion of pre-hearing formalities for batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a> and said that the hearing of the matter will be starting from 02-08-2023.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h4>\n

On 05-08-2019, the Central Government had abrogated the Articles 370<\/a> and 35-A<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a> and the Parliament had passed the Jammu and Kashmir (Reorganisation) Act, 2019, which provided for the reogranisation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcated the State into two Union Territories – Jammu and Kashmir with a legislature and Ladakh without one. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (3) of Article 370 read with clause (1) of Article 370<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>, the President, on the recommendation of the Parliament, had declared that all clauses of the said Article 370 shall cease to be operative except for the provision that: \u201cAll provisions of this Constitution<\/a>, as amended from time to time, without any modifications or exceptions, shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir notwithstanding anything contrary contained in Article 152 or Article 308 or any other article of this Constitution<\/a> or any other provision of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir or any law, document, judgement, ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having the force of law in the territory of India, or any other instrument, treaty or agreement as envisaged under Article 363 or otherwise.\u201d<\/i>1<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Several writ petitions were filed before the Court against the abrogation of Article 370 and reorganisation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. While hearing a batch of these petitions, the Court had previously refused<\/a> to refer the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Centre’s move to abrogate Article 370 to a larger bench. The matter has now come before the Court after a period of more than 2 years.<\/p>\n

Court’s Direction<\/h4>\n

It was brough to the attention of the Court that an application was moved on behalf of Dr. Shah Faesal for removal of his name from the array of Parties. A similar application was also moved on behalf of another petitioner Shehla Rashid by Advocates-on-Record Aakarsh Kamra and Charu Mathur for deletion of her name as well, on the grounds that Shehla Rashid was General Secretary of the JK People’s Movement Party at the time of filing of the said Writ Petition challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and that now she had resigned from her post. It was also submitted that she believed that she is not qualified enough to hold an informed opinion on the larger implications of abrogation of Article 370 as it was a Constitutional move which is now proving to be beneficial for the people of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.<\/p>\n

Consequently, it was brought out that the cause title was required to be amended. The Court allowed the said application and directed that the names of these petitioners shall be deleted from the array of the parties and with the consent of all the counsels present, the Court had decided to amend the cause title to \u2018In Re: Article 370<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a><\/b>\u2019 for the convenience of reference.<\/p>\n

The Court has listed the matter for hearing on 02-08-2023.<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India \u00a0HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

1.<\/a> Article 370<\/a>, Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The hearing of the matter will begin from 02-08-2023. Here is all you need to know about the Article 370 of the Constitution case.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":296506,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[20791,59218,37021,59217,44635,59215,59234,5363],"class_list":["post-296498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-article-370","tag-in-re-article-370-of-the-constitution","tag-jammu-and-kashmir-reorganisation-act-2019","tag-petitioners","tag-sc","tag-shah-faesal","tag-shehla-rashid","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\n[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners; Cause title amended to 'In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution'\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shahla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shahla Rashid drops out as Petitioners; Cause title amended to 'In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution'\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-11T09:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-13T12:56:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shehla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-11T09:30:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-13T12:56:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners; Cause title amended to 'In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution'\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"article 370\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shehla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners | SCC Blog","description":"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners; Cause title amended to 'In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution'","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shahla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019","og_description":"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shahla Rashid drops out as Petitioners; Cause title amended to 'In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution'","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-11T09:30:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-13T12:56:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shehla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/","name":"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-11T09:30:57+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-13T12:56:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"[Article 370] Shah Faesal and Shehla Rashid drops out as Petitioners; Cause title amended to 'In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution'","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"article 370"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/article-370-shah-faesal-and-shahla-rashid-drops-out-as-petitioners-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Article 370 matter back on track after 2020: Shah Faesal, Shehla Rashid drop out as Petitioners; Cause Title amended to \u2018In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/article-370.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-reserves-verdict-on-article-370-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":296498,"position":0},"title":"Abrogation of Article 370 | Supreme Court Constitution Bench reserves verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The hearing of the matter began on 02-08-2023 and was concluded on 05-09-2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"article 370","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218727,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/28\/article-370-5-judge-bench-to-hear-the-plea-challenging-j-sc-says-we-know-what-to-do\/","url_meta":{"origin":296498,"position":1},"title":"Article 370| 5-judge bench to hear the plea challenging J&K Reorganisation Bill; SC says ‘We know what to do’","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The batch of petitions challenging the changes brought in the constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir by abrogating Article 370 has been referred to a five-judge Constitution bench. The issued notices to the Centre and the Jammu and Kashmir administration. The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308910,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/11\/live-report-supreme-court-judgment-on-article-370-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":296498,"position":2},"title":"Article 370 Verdict | Supreme Court upholds abrogation of Special Status for Jammu and Kashmir","author":"Editor","date":"December 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Among the three judgments, one was authored by Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI on behalf of himself, BR Gavai and Surya Kant, JJ., while Justice Justice Kaul and Khanna, J. authored separate but concurring judgments.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/live-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226435,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/02\/article-370-heres-why-the-5-judge-bench-refused-to-refer-the-pleas-challenging-the-abrogation-of-article-370-to-a-larger-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":296498,"position":3},"title":"Article 370| Here’s why the 5-judge bench refused to refer the pleas challenging the abrogation of Article 370 to a larger bench","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution bench of NV Ramana, SK Kaul, R. Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai and Surya Kant, JJ has refused to refer the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Centre\u2019s move to abrogate Article 370 to a larger bench. The Court was hearing the limited issue regarding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/08\/article-370-no-urgent-hearing-on-plea-challenging-jk-reorganisation-bill\/","url_meta":{"origin":296498,"position":4},"title":"Article 370: No urgent hearing on plea challenging J&K Reorganisation Bill","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of NV Ramana and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has refused to give urgent hearing to the plea challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution. Advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, who had filed the plea before the Supreme Court, had mentioned the matter before the bench and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/article-370-5-judge-bench-to-begin-hearing-in-plea-challenging-jk-reorganisation-bill-from-tomorrow\/","url_meta":{"origin":296498,"position":5},"title":"Article 370| 5-judge bench to begin hearing in plea challenging J&K Reorganisation Bill from tomorrow","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A 5-judge bench of NV Ramana, SK Kaul, R. Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai and Surya Kant, JJ will begin hearing the plea challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution from tomorrow. Advocate Manohar Lal Sharma had moved the Court seeking quashing of the Union Of India\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296498"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296498\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/296506"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}