{"id":296489,"date":"2023-07-11T14:00:37","date_gmt":"2023-07-11T08:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=296489"},"modified":"2023-07-17T09:29:32","modified_gmt":"2023-07-17T03:59:32","slug":"bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Bombay High Court:<\/b> In a bunch of petitions challenging the notices issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (&#8216;SEBI&#8217;) based on &#8216;fit and proper person&#8217; criteria under Clause 3 (b)(ii) of Schedule II <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000814435\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008<\/a>, the Division Bench of G.S. Patel and Neela Gokhale, JJ. listed the matter in August after SEBI clarified that compliance with the requirements of the notice within 15 days was not insisted upon while the matters were pending before the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">SEBI had prescribed automatic disqualifications under the 2008 Regulations based on &#8216;fit and proper person&#8217; criteria. Notices were issued to IIFL Securities Limited and 5 Paisa to take steps within 15 days and furnish the compliance report in accordance with Clause 6 of Schedule II to 2008 Regulations for the very reason that there were certain matters pending investigation with the relevant enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The compliance requirements as per the said notices in the lead matter included immediate termination of the petitioner (Venkataraman Rajaman, Director, IIFL Securities), suspension of all voting rights held by the petitioner in both IIFL Securities Limited and 5 Paisa, and a forced divestiture of the petitioner&#8217;s entire shareholding.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for SEBI had submitted that considering the challenges raised and the pendency of matters before the High Court, SEBI was not presently insisting on compliance within 15 days with the requirements of the notices.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With such relief given by SEBI against compliance to the parties against whom notices were issued, the Court listed the next hearing of the instant matter on 2-08-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Venkataraman Rajaman v. Securities and Exchange Board of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3Q671t13\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Bom 1373<\/a>, dated 6-07-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Senior Advocate Janak Dwarkadas, Advocate Samit Shukla, Advocate Vinodini Srinivasan, Advocate Saloni Shah, Advocate Shivani Khanwilkar, Senior Advocate Prateek Sakseria, Advocate Nitesh Jain, Advocate Hridhay Khurana, Advocate Joran Diwan, Advocate Anubhav Ghosh, Advocate Devarsh Shah, Advocate Atharva Gade, Senior Advocate Amit Desai, Senior Advocate Zal Andhyarujina, Advocate Suresh Gupta;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Senior Advocate Amit Desai, Advocate Munaf Virjee, Advocate Rushabh P, Senior Advocate Rafique Dada, Senior Advocate JJ Bhatt, Advocate Mihir Mody, Advocate Arnav Misra, Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat, Advocate Daneel Pancras.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>SEBI had prescribed automatic disqualifications under the 2008 Regulations based on &#8216;fit and proper person&#8217; criteria.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[59213,2569,58238,59211,59212,2563,16791],"class_list":["post-296489","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-5-paisa","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-dsk-legal","tag-fit-and-proper-person","tag-iifl-securities","tag-SEBI","tag-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC | 15-day Compliance with disqualification notices not insisted by SEBI | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"During pendency before Bombay High Court, SEBI shall not insist upon 15-day compliance with disqualification notices based on fit and proper person test.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"During pendency before Bombay High Court, SEBI shall not insist upon 15-day compliance with disqualification notices based on fit and proper person test.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-11T08:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-17T03:59:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC | 15-day Compliance with disqualification notices not insisted by SEBI | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-11T08:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-17T03:59:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"During pendency before Bombay High Court, SEBI shall not insist upon 15-day compliance with disqualification notices based on fit and proper person test.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"bombay high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC | 15-day Compliance with disqualification notices not insisted by SEBI | SCC Blog","description":"During pendency before Bombay High Court, SEBI shall not insist upon 15-day compliance with disqualification notices based on fit and proper person test.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency","og_description":"During pendency before Bombay High Court, SEBI shall not insist upon 15-day compliance with disqualification notices based on fit and proper person test.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-11T08:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-17T03:59:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/","name":"Bombay HC | 15-day Compliance with disqualification notices not insisted by SEBI | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-11T08:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-17T03:59:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"During pendency before Bombay High Court, SEBI shall not insist upon 15-day compliance with disqualification notices based on fit and proper person test.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"bombay high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/bombay-high-court-15-day-compliance-disqualification-notices-not-insisted-by-sebi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court | 15-day compliance with disqualification notice based on \u2018fit and proper person\u2019 test not insisted by SEBI during pendency"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/fit-and-proper-criteria-under-the-sebi-intermediaries-regulations-is-it-time-to-revisit\/","url_meta":{"origin":296489,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Fit and Proper\u2019 Criteria under the SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations \u2014 Is it time to Revisit?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ameya Gokhale\u2020, Vaibhav Singh\u2020\u2020 and Radhika Indapurkar\u2020\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 58","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sebi (intermediaries) regulations","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/sebi-intermediaries-regulations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/sebi-intermediaries-regulations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/sebi-intermediaries-regulations.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/sebi-intermediaries-regulations.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/30\/del-hc-appointment-of-sebi-adjudicating-office-admin-not-quasi-judicial-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":296489,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court: Appointment of SEBI Adjudicating Officer is administrative; Does not require a prior, reasoned recorded opinion","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"December 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFormation of opinion under Rule 3 of Securities and Exchange Board of India Adjudication Rules need not be expressly recorded at pre-notice stage.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appointment of SEBI adjudicating office","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-SEBI-adjudicating-office.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-SEBI-adjudicating-office.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-SEBI-adjudicating-office.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/appointment-of-SEBI-adjudicating-office.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/11\/sebi-introduces-concept-of-ai\/","url_meta":{"origin":296489,"position":2},"title":"SEBI introduces the concept of AI vide its amendment in Intermediaries Regulations","author":"Kriti","date":"February 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"AI has to be used keeping in mind privacy, security and integrity of investors and stakeholders.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/sebi.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/sebi.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/sebi.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/sebi.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350106,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/09\/when-soft-enforcement-stings-rethinking-sebis-warning-letters\/","url_meta":{"origin":296489,"position":3},"title":"When Soft Enforcement Stings: Rethinking SEBI&#8217;s Warning Letters","author":"Editor","date":"June 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Saurav Rajurkar*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI Warning Letters","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/SEBI-Warning-Letters.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/SEBI-Warning-Letters.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/SEBI-Warning-Letters.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/SEBI-Warning-Letters.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/10\/sebi-stock-broker-regulation-2026-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":296489,"position":4},"title":"SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations, 2026: Key Provisions and Implications","author":"Shubhi","date":"January 10, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"SEBI has announced the SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations, 2026, outlining key provisions on registration, compliance, conduct, fees, and investor protection.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI Stock Broker Regulation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/SEBI-Stock-Broker-Regulation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/SEBI-Stock-Broker-Regulation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/SEBI-Stock-Broker-Regulation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/SEBI-Stock-Broker-Regulation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323402,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/legislation-roundup-may-2024-legal-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":296489,"position":5},"title":"Legislation Roundup May 2024: Delhi HC Rules revised; Singapore Regulations under Securities and Futures Act for Corporate Governance; SEBI &amp; RBI Circulars","author":"Kriti","date":"June 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NATIONAL DAM SAFETY AUTHORITY National Dam Safety Authority lays down Guidelines and Checklist for inspection of dams On 6-5-2024, the Inspection, Instrumentation, Seismic Data, Risk Assessment and Evaluation of Specified Dam Regulations, 2024 were published which were earlier notified by the National Dam Safety Authority on 24-4-2024 to ensure safety\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Legislation Roundup May 2024","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Legislation-Roundup-May-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Legislation-Roundup-May-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Legislation-Roundup-May-2024.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Legislation-Roundup-May-2024.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296489"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296489\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296489"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}