{"id":29621,"date":"2015-12-21T09:53:57","date_gmt":"2015-12-21T04:23:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=29621"},"modified":"2016-01-06T16:21:04","modified_gmt":"2016-01-06T10:51:04","slug":"condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/","title":{"rendered":"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: While dealing with a question relating to condoning of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement, the Court held that deducting the number of days spent for the purpose of settlement can be considered sufficient reason to condone the delay.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendant to restrain violation and infringement of its rights in its 8 patents along with damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. In furtherance of the court proceedings, a notice in the counter claim was issued by Court vide order dated 31st July, 2015 and a period of 8 weeks was given to the plaintiff to file its written statement. For 59 days, both the parties were negotiating. Thereafter, the plaintiff informed the Court that both the parties have not been able to resolve the matter. Later, an application was filed by the Defendant counsel that as per Section 16 read with Schedule I of the Commercial Courts Ordinance, a written statement filed after expiry of 120 days from the date of service of summons cannot be taken on record. Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff submitted that the present suit was filed by the Plaintiff before the Original Side of this Court on 20th March, 2015 and now as per the Commercial Court Ordinance, the present suit stands transferred before the Commercial Division of this Court with effect from 15th November, 2015. Therefore, in the light of the proviso of Section 15 (4) of the Commercial Court Ordinance, this Court has the discretion to take on record the written statement filed by the plaintiff on 5th December, 2015 inasmuch as the timelines as laid down by the Commercial Courts Ordinance will become applicable to the present case from 15th November, 2015.<\/p>\n

The Court while relying on Dr. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir<\/em> v. Amrit Pal Singh<\/em>, ILR (2003) I Delhi 577 held that since the parties were trying to resolve their dispute amicably and that process took 59 days, the said period is to be excluded from the period provided in the Civil Procedure Code and Clause 4D(i) of Commercial Courts Ordinance. The Court also held that the present suit squarely falls under the said exemption and therefore provides for extended timelines for completion of pleadings as per the prior statute. The Court also said that the prescribed period of 120 days\u2019 timeline will be applicable in cases filed subsequent to the notification of the Ordinance and the same is not applicable in the present case. [Telefonaktiebolaget L.M Ericsson<\/em> v. Lava International Ltd<\/em>., 2015 SCC OnLine Del 13990<\/a><\/b>, decided on December 9, 2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: While dealing with a question relating to condoning of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3066,3587],"class_list":["post-29621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-delay","tag-settlement"],"yoast_head":"\nCondonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: While dealing with a question relating to condoning of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-21T04:23:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-06T10:51:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/\",\"name\":\"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-21T04:23:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-06T10:51:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement","og_description":"Delhi High Court: While dealing with a question relating to condoning of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-12-21T04:23:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-06T10:51:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/","name":"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-12-21T04:23:57+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-06T10:51:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/21\/condonation-of-delay-after-deducting-the-days-which-were-spent-for-the-purpose-of-settlement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Condonation of delay after deducting the days which were spent for the purpose of settlement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":356637,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-costs-in-vi-john-dabur-trademark-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":29621,"position":0},"title":"Explained | Dabur Meswak Trademark suit: Delhi HC\u2019s decision to quash Rs 12,00,000 cost imposed for 48 day delay in filing Written Statement by VI-John","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no absolute bar on the Trial Court to consider the subsequent developments and condone the delay if justifiable grounds are made out in the Application for condonation of delay.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"VI-John Dabur Meswak Trademark suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/VI-John-Dabur-Meswak-Trademark-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/VI-John-Dabur-Meswak-Trademark-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/VI-John-Dabur-Meswak-Trademark-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/VI-John-Dabur-Meswak-Trademark-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253563,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/trademark-infringement\/","url_meta":{"origin":29621,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Will the rights of a prior user override those of subsequent user even though it had been accorded registration of its trademark? All-Inclusive Report on Trademark Infringement of \u2018Rajdhani\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jayant Nath, J., did a comprehensive analysis of the matter involving trademark infringement. Legacy of Rajdhani Plaintiff had originally conceived and adopted the trademark\/label \u2018Rajdhani\u2019 for several products. Plaintiff company was formed in 1983 and carried forward the said business under the trademark\/label\u2019 Rajdhani\u2019. Trademarks\/Labels are owned\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":341331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/dhc-excludes-time-spent-in-mediation-for-calculating-limitation-to-file-written-statement\/","url_meta":{"origin":29621,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Forcing to file written statement during mediation will hamper entire mediation process\u2019: Delhi HC excludes time spent in mediation for calculating limitation to file written statement","author":"Arushi","date":"February 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Forcing the parties to file a written statement or to complete the pleadings during the process of mediation will prevent the parties in freely communicating with each other, which they have not been able to do since the dispute started.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304719,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/14\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-lower-courts-order-for-condonation-of-delay-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":29621,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Jurisdiction under Article 227 is vast, should be exercised sparingly\u2019; Calcutta High Court upholds lower court\u2019s order to condone delay","author":"Ritu","date":"October 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBy the Civil Procedure Code (amendment Act, 1999) the scope of Section 115 of the code has been curtailed but that does not mean that due to such curtailment, the High court\u2019s power of superintendence under Article 227 has been expanded.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/28\/specific-performance-relief-sale-consideration-hopelessly-delayed-application-seeking-extension-of-time-cannot-be-condoned-853-days-supremec-ourt-trial-court-telangana-high-court-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":29621,"position":4},"title":"Specific Relief| Supreme Court shows dismay over Trial Court & Telagana HC’s orders allowing \u201chopelessly delayed\u201d application seeking extension of time filed after 853 days; sets aside order","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was unimpressed with the explanation given by the plaintiff for the delay of 853 days that he initially fell sick with Jaundice and was later confined to house with High Blood Pressure, Diabetes and other diseases. The petition had extension of time to deposit the balance sale\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-560.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-560.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-560.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-560.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/27\/sufficient-cause\/","url_meta":{"origin":29621,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Scope of Or. 9 R. 13 CPC application: Whether summons duly served and\/or whether defendant was prevented by ‘sufficient cause’ from appearing? Explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., expressed that \u201cSufficient Cause\u201d is an elastic expression and no hard and fast guidelines are prescribed. In the present matter, Judgment dated 01-02-2019 was sought to be set aside as well as condonation of delay of 582 days. Factual Matrix Permanent Injunction restraining\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}