{"id":296151,"date":"2023-07-06T16:00:19","date_gmt":"2023-07-06T10:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=296151"},"modified":"2023-07-12T10:49:57","modified_gmt":"2023-07-12T05:19:57","slug":"himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/","title":{"rendered":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/b> A single bench comprising of Jyotsna Rewal Dua<\/b>,* J., held that the District Judge should first examine whether the 75% of the award amount is actually deposited before allowing an application preferred under Section 19<\/a> of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006<\/a> (MSMD Act).<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the Arbitrator issued an Arbitral Award dated 30-10-2021 in favour of the petitioner. The respondent challenged the award and concurrently filed an application under S. 19<\/a> of the MSME Act<\/a> praying for a stay on the implementation and execution of the Arbitral Award. The District Judge vide order dated 21-12-2022 accepted the respondent’s Section 19 application on the ground that respondent deposited 75% of the award amount in compliance of the Section 19<\/a> of MSME Act<\/a>. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the District Judge, the petitioner preferred a petition before this Court challenging the same.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/b><\/p>\n

Whether the deposit made by the respondent before the District Judge was in consonance with the requirement of Section 19<\/a> of MSME Act<\/a>?<\/p>\n

Law Point<\/b><\/p>\n

Section 19 – Application for setting aside decree, award or order.<\/p>\n

“No application for setting aside any decree, award or other order made either by the Council itself or by any institution or centre providing alternate dispute resolution services to which a reference is made by the Council, shall be entertained by any court unless the appellant (not being a supplier) has deposited with it seventy-five per cent. of the amount in terms of the decree, award or, as the case may be, the other order in the manner directed by such court:<\/i><\/p>\n

Provided that pending disposal of the application to set aside the decree, award or order, the court shall order that such percentage of the amount deposited shall be paid to the supplier, as it considers reasonable under the circumstances of the case, subject to such conditions as it deems necessary to impose.”<\/i><\/p>\n

Court’s Observation<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court relied on Tirupati Steels<\/i> v. Shubh Industrial Component<\/i>, (2022) 7 SCC 429<\/a>, where it was held that it is mandatorily required to pre-deposit of 75% of the awarded amount under Section 19<\/a> of the MSME Act<\/a>, however, at the same time, the pre-deposit may be allowed to be made in instalments owing to the hardship caused to the appellant\/applicant.<\/p>\n

“…pre-deposit of 75% of the awarded amount under Section 19 of the Act is a mandatory requirement. However, at the same time, considering the hardship which may be projected and the Court being satisfied the pre-deposit may be allowed to be made in installments.”<\/b><\/p>\n

While accepting the contentions of the petitioner that the respondent did not deposit 75% of the awarded amount, the Court observed that that the District Judge in the impugned order simply stated that the respondent had deposited 75% of the awarded amount without discussing whether the amount actually deposited satisfied the condition of pre-deposit of 75% of the award.<\/p>\n

Court’s Verdict<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court set aside the impugned order dated 21-12-2022 and directed the District Court to decide the application moved by the respondent afresh in accordance with law. The Court further directed the District Court to not execute the impugned Arbitral Award dated 30-10-2021, till the respondent’s application is decided.<\/p>\n

[Pratap Industries Products v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine HP 746<\/a>, order dated 26-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Atul Jhingan, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n

Mr. Janesh Gupta, Counsel for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside the impugned order and directed the District Court to decide the matter afresh.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":292797,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2633,2929,59076,47452,59077],"class_list":["post-296151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral_award","tag-Himachal_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-justice-jyotsna-rewal-dua","tag-pre-deposit","tag-section-19-of-the-msme-act"],"yoast_head":"\nDistrict Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court held that District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court held that District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-06T10:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-12T05:19:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/\",\"name\":\"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-06T10:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-12T05:19:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Himachal Pradesh High Court held that District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"himachal pradesh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court held that District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court held that District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-06T10:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-12T05:19:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/","name":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-06T10:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-12T05:19:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court held that District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"himachal pradesh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-court-examine-pre-deposite-75-award-actually-deposited\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"District Court must examine whether pre-deposit of 75% of award under Section 19 of the MSME Act is actually deposited: Himachal Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/08\/himachal-pradesh-hc-consent-by-parties-can-be-expressed-or-implied-for-extending-arbitral-period\/","url_meta":{"origin":296151,"position":0},"title":"Consent for extending arbitral period under Section 29A(3) of 2015 Amendment Act doesn\u2019t need to be express or in writing: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe consensus of the parties in proceeding with the arbitration case beyond twelve months without raising any objection to the continuation of proceeding does amount to consent. On the basis of such consent, the arbitral award if passed after six months would be a valid award.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215183,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/30\/himachal-pradesh-hc-appointments-anoop-chitkara-and-jyotsna-rewal-dua-appointed-as-judge-and-addl-judge-respectively\/","url_meta":{"origin":296151,"position":1},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC [Appointments] | Anoop Chitkara and Jyotsna Rewal Dua appointed as Judge and Addl. Judge, respectively","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"President appoints Shri Anoop Chitkara, to be a Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, to be Additional Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, for a period of two years, with effect from the date\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214142,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/sc-collegium-recommended-satyen-vaidya-advocate-be-appointed-as-judge-of-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":296151,"position":2},"title":"SC Collegium recommends– Elevation of 3 Advocates as Judges of Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for the appointment of Satyen Vaidya, Advocate, as Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court. Proposal for appointment of following two Advocates, as Judges of the Himachal Pradesh High Court: 1. Anoop Chitkara, and 2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Collegium comprising of Ranjana Gogoi, CJ and S.A. Bobde and N.V.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233046,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/additional-judges-of-calcutta-and-himachal-pradesh-hc-made-permanent\/","url_meta":{"origin":296151,"position":3},"title":"Appointments | One Additional Judge of Calcutta and another from Himachal Pradesh HC made Permanent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Appointment of Judges President appoints Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay, Additional Judge of the Calcutta High Court, to be a Judge of the Calcutta High Court and Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Additional Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, to be a Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court. \u00a0 [Notification dt.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Appointments-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Appointments-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Appointments-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Appointments-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Appointments-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/hp-hc-court-to-grant-further-extension-when-an-award-cannot-be-made-even-within-the-extended-period-by-the-competent-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":296151,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Court to grant further extension, when an award cannot be made even within the extended period by the Competent Authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The instant petition was related to Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 entertained by Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. where the petitioner sought an extension of time. Factual matrix of the case was that when the dispute arose between the parties the matter was referred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244985,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/05\/chief-justice-of-himachal-pradesh-high-court-constitutes-national-law-university-advisory-committee-to-look-after-the-matters-of-hpnlu\/","url_meta":{"origin":296151,"position":5},"title":"Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court Constitutes \u2018National Law University, Advisory Committee\u2019 to look after the matters of HPNLU","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Reported by Shiva Vishnoi","rel":"","context":"In "Law School News"","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HPNLU.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HPNLU.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HPNLU.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HPNLU.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HPNLU.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296151\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}