{"id":295859,"date":"2023-07-03T15:30:46","date_gmt":"2023-07-03T10:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=295859"},"modified":"2023-07-04T09:36:37","modified_gmt":"2023-07-04T04:06:37","slug":"mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","title":{"rendered":"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/b> | In a matter related to non-renewal of contract of a contractual employee on account of unsatisfactory performance, a Single bench comprising of Sanjay Dwivedi<\/b>,* J., held that “claiming regularization on the basis of past performance and long service is not proper because the order of appointment is very specific that the appointment of the petitioner was purely on temporary basis and was coterminous with the project.”<\/b><\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, vide order dated 11.03.2008, the petitioner was appointed as a Member of Project Facilitator Team (PFT) temporary and purely on contractual basis till June 2012 or up to the end of project, whichever was earlier. Vide order dated 13-06-2018 issued by the District Project Manager, the petitioner’s agreement of contract was not renewed owing to the petitioner’s performance not being found satisfactory for the period 2017-18. Aggrieved by the impugned order issued by the District Project Manager, the petitioner preferred a petition under Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a> questioning the legality, validity and propriety of the impugned orders.<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/b><\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that the impugned order regarding not renewing the petitioner’s agreement of contract was issued by the incompetent authority. On the other hand, the respondents contended that several opportunities were granted to the petitioner to improve her work, therefore it cannot be contended that opportunity of hearing was not provided to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Court’s Observation<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court observed that the petitioner was appointed as a Member of Project Facilitator Team on certain terms and conditions i.e., the appointment was for a specific term and temporary in nature, purely on contract basis and later the petitioner’s contract was extended till 31-03-2018. The Court further observed that notice was issue to the petitioner showing irregularities and shortcomings in her service and performance of work and explanation was sought from the petitioner, therefore, it cannot be said that the opportunity to satisfy the authority about regarding her dis-satisfactory performance was not provided to her.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the employee will not have any right to claim regularization, when the terms and conditions of the appointment clearly state that the appointment is purely on a temporary basis.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Madras Institute of Development Studies<\/i> v. K. Sivasubramaniyam<\/i>, (2016) 1 SCC 454<\/a>, where it was held that “a decision of experts about suitability of a candidate generally cannot be examined under writ jurisdiction in absence of malafides, bias or arbitrariness”<\/b> and observed that the Court cannot interference in respondent authorities decision to not extend the contract of appointment of the petitioner when petitioner’s performance was not found satisfactory and sufficient reasons were shown for the same.<\/p>\n

In the light of facts and circumstances of the present case, the Court held that present case neither a case where the opportunity of hearing was not granted before taking decision of not extending her contract, nor a case here there was any violation of principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n

Court’s Verdict<\/b><\/p>\n

On not finding anything wrong with the decision of the respondent authorities in not extending the contract appointment of the petitioner, the Court dismissed the present petition on being without any substance and devoid of merit.<\/p>\n

[Saroj Gupta v. State of M.P., 2023 SCC OnLine MP 1683<\/a>, order dated 12-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Sanjay Dwivedi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Jitendra Tiwari, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n

Me. Darshan Soni, Counsel for the State\/Respondent No. 1;<\/p>\n

Mr. Manan Agrawal, Counsel for the Respondent No. 2, 3 and 5;<\/p>\n

Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Counsel for the Respondent No. 4.<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court held that “in the terms and conditions of the appointment it is clearly mentioned that the employee would not be having any right to claim regularization”.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":291010,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[58674,7201,58966,35064],"class_list":["post-295859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-justice-sanjay-dwivedi","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-of-principles-of-natural-justice","tag-regularization-of-service"],"yoast_head":"\nNo regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there will be no regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there will be no regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-03T10:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-04T04:06:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/\",\"name\":\"No regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-03T10:00:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-04T04:06:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there will be no regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there will be no regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there will be no regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-07-03T10:00:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-04T04:06:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/","name":"No regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-07-03T10:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-04T04:06:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there will be no regularization of service based on past performance or long service for temporary appointees","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/mp-hc-no-regularization-service-past-performance-long-service-temporary-appointees\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Temporary Appointees cannot claim regularization based on past performance or long service: Madhya Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-right-to-regularisation-of-person-on-purely-contractual-basis-depends-on-express-or-implied-terms-of-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":295859,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Right to regularisation of person on purely contractual basis depends on express or implied terms of appointment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: P.B. Bajanthri J., dismissed the petition for regularisation of the service on the ground that statutory rule recognizing such right was not in their favor. A petition was made to quash the endorsement issued to the petitioner and to seek respondent to regularize their services in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/19\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-substitution-of-an-appointment-on-compassionate-grounds-through-contractual-appointment-held-illegal-directions-issued\/","url_meta":{"origin":295859,"position":1},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Substitution of an appointment on compassionate grounds through contractual appointment held illegal; directions issued","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. allowed a writ petition directing the respondents to pay costs for the delay in compassionate employment. The case of the writ petitioner is that his father, who was working as an Assistant Veterinary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/mp-hc-without-regularization-held-permanent-employees-will-only-receive-minimum-of-the-pay-scale-but-no-increments\/","url_meta":{"origin":295859,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Without regularization, held, permanent employees will only receive minimum of the pay-scale but no increments","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., directed the respondents to give the benefits of a classified permanent employee to the petitioner. The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India asking the Court to direct the respondents to pay him the salary as per the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321494,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/no-disciplinary-action-required-for-temporary-employees-termination-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":295859,"position":3},"title":"No disciplinary action required for temporary employee’s termination due to unsatisfactory performance: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court stated that the petitioner, being an educational institution, is governed by specific laws and regulations concerning service conditions, which was not adequately considered by the Labour Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":295859,"position":4},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji","author":"Ritu","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The present case is \u201cnothing but the assimilation of personal and political antipathies, more precisely, a politically oriented-animosity, which makes the petitioner's prosecution malicious.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241673,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/04\/madhya-pradesh-hc-justice-sanjay-yadav-appointed-as-judge-of-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":295859,"position":5},"title":"Madhya Pradesh HC | Justice Sanjay Yadav appointed as Judge of Allahabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"President transfers Justice Sanjay Yadav, Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, as a Judge of the Allahabad High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Allahabad High Court. Ministry of Law and Justice","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295859"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295859\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}