{"id":295581,"date":"2023-06-29T11:00:19","date_gmt":"2023-06-29T05:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=295581"},"modified":"2023-07-03T16:41:32","modified_gmt":"2023-07-03T11:11:32","slug":"nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor’s counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai:<\/b> A Division bench comprising M. Venugopal, J., and Shreesha Merla<\/b>* (Technical Member), held that a Resolution Professional can keep a claim in abeyance on the basis that the counterclaim of the Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in an Arbitration Proceedings.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant-Financial Creditor preferred a financial claim application, but the same was kept in abeyance by the Resolution Professional due to the pendency of the arbitration proceedings wherein the Corporate Debtor had filed its counterclaim and the same is pending for determination.<\/p>\n

The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 02-12-2022, dismissed the application and held that the applicant’s claim is collected and collated by the Resolution Professional and the same is kept in abeyance to decide the claim amount by the applicant with certainty. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the appellant preferred an appeal before the NCLAT challenging the same.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/b><\/p>\n

Whether the Resolution Professional can keep a claim in abeyance on the basis that the Arbitration Proceedings are pending, wherein, the counterclaim of the Corporate Debtor is pending for determination?<\/p>\n

NCLAT’s Observation<\/b><\/p>\n

The NCLAT observed that the respondent contended that whether the appellant’s claim is admitted or rejected and what is the quantum of money and interest claimed will only be determined after the outcome of the Arbitration Proceedings where the determination of Corporate Debtor’s counter claim is pending, therefore the appellant’s claim was kept in abeyance.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT observed that the appellant’s claim cannot be admitted till the counter claim of the Corporate Debtor is determined as the same may end in ‘set off’ of the sum payable to the appellant, therefore the Resolution Professional was within his power and limit to keep the Claims in abeyance for plurality of reasons.<\/p>\n

NCLAT’s Verdict<\/b><\/p>\n

In the light of arguments advanced by both the parties, the NCLAT held that since the arbitration proceedings in regard to the counterclaim of the Corporate Debtor is pending; the Resolution Professional can keep the claims in abeyance and the claim sum can only be determined with certainty after the determination of the arbitration proceeding, therefore, the Adjudicating Authority has rightly dismissed the Interlocutory application and the impugned order is free from any flaw.<\/p>\n

[Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd. v. Pradeep Kumar Sravanam, 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 278<\/a>, order dated 12-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice M. Venugopal<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Promod Nair, Senior Advocate and Mr. Amar Gupta, Counsel for the Appellant.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

While dismissing the present appeal, the NCLAT held that appellant’s prayer pertaining to admission of the claim cannot be acceded to in the ‘eye of Law’.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[30526,38453,58857,30182,22014,12521,34025],"class_list":["post-295581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-arbitration-proceedings","tag-justice-m-venugopal","tag-keep-in-abeyance","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-resolution-professional"],"yoast_head":"\nResolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings: NCLAT | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that the Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor's counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that the Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-29T05:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-03T11:11:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor's counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor’s counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T05:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-03T11:11:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":444,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"arbitration proceedings\",\"Justice M. Venugopal\",\"keep in abeyance\",\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal\",\"NCLAT\",\"NCLT\",\"Resolution Professional\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Tribunals\\\/Commissions\\\/Regulatory Bodies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings: NCLAT | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T05:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-03T11:11:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that the Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/29\\\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor’s counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings: NCLAT | SCC Blog","description":"NCLAT held that the Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor's counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers","og_description":"NCLAT held that the Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-29T05:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-03T11:11:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor's counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor’s counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers","datePublished":"2023-06-29T05:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-03T11:11:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/"},"wordCount":444,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","keywords":["arbitration proceedings","Justice M. Venugopal","keep in abeyance","National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","NCLAT","NCLT","Resolution Professional"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/","name":"Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings: NCLAT | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-29T05:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-03T11:11:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that the Resolution Professional can keep in abeyance the claim, when counter claim of Corporate Debtor is pending for determination in Arbitration Proceedings.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/29\/nclat-keep-in-abeyance-claim-resolution-professional-pending-arbitration-proceedings-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can Resolution Professional keep claims in abeyance during pendency of Corporate Debtor’s counter claim before arbitrator? NCLAT Answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/05\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-june-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":295581,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal Roundup June 2023 | Top Stories on Justice Verma\u2019s death; Mula-Mutha Riverfront Project; Tragic mix-up of a sperm sample and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly june 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-june-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/corporate-debtor-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-resolution-professional-resolution-plan-coc-approved-settlement-plan-nclt-application-section-a-rejected-nclat-appeal-no-error-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":295581,"position":1},"title":"Strong reason required to keep the application in abeyance; NCLAT dismisses appeal finding no error in Adjudicating Authority’s order","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal observed that an application under S. 12A cannot be entertained after approval of Resolution Plan by CoC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":296119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/nclat-application-s-9-ibc-for-implementation-of-arbitral-award-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":295581,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Arbitration Proceedings\u2019 and \u2018IBC Proceedings\u2019 cannot go on together; NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order rejecting Section 9 application","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that an application preferred under Section 9 of the IBC for implementation of an Arbitral Award is not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/27\/corporate-insolvency-cirp-resolution-plan-not-approval-eligibility-of-the-resolution-applicant-appeal-last-opportunity-revival-of-corporate-debtor\/","url_meta":{"origin":295581,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT provides time-bound opportunity to Resolution Professional and CoC to revive Corporate Debtor","author":"Ritu","date":"February 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a case related to rejection of Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, which was once approve the Adjudicating Authority, the Tribunal opined that the Adjudicating Authority was right on non-approval of the Resolution Plan as the Adjudicating Authority's order was not followed in its true spirit.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/irp-rp-cannot-seek-unpaid-fees-costs-members-corporate-debtor-insolvency-nclat-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":295581,"position":4},"title":"In project wise insolvency, IRP\/RP cannot seek unpaid Fees\/Costs from members of CoCs of another project of Corporate Debtor: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the appellant has no Locus Standi to make claim for any unpaid Fees\/Costs from the members of the CoCs, as he is neither the RP in the project nor is connected with another project.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/nclat-jet-airways-nclt-order-declaring-insolvency-proceedings-in-netherlands-as-not-maintainable-stayed\/","url_meta":{"origin":295581,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | Jet Airways -\u2014 NCLT order declaring insolvency proceedings in Netherlands as not maintainable stayed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi: The 3-Judge Member Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and Justice A.I.S Cheema (Judicial Member) and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member), while pronouncing an order in regard to the \"Jet Airways\" setback addressed the following question: \"Whether separate proceeding(s) in 'Corporate Insolvency\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295581\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}