{"id":295094,"date":"2023-06-21T13:30:41","date_gmt":"2023-06-21T08:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=295094"},"modified":"2023-06-23T09:26:12","modified_gmt":"2023-06-23T03:56:12","slug":"madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/b> | A single judge bench comprise of Sanjay Dwivedi<\/b>,* J., held that held that an FIR can be quashed if there are feeble chances of ultimate conviction and no useful purpose is likely to serve by allowing such prosecution to continue and quashed FIR lodged under S. 377<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) against the petitioner, Raghavji.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, a complaint was lodged in 2013 against the then minister, Raghavji-petitioner under S. 377<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> alleging that the petitioner was doing unnatural sex with him for three years in return for getting him employed. The petitioner preferred the present petition under S. 482<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) for quashing the impugned FIR on the ground that the impugned FIR is malicious and the offence under S. 377<\/a> of IPC<\/a> is not made out.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/b><\/p>\n

✓ Whether the present case is a case of consent and an offence under S. 377<\/a> of that IPC<\/a> is made out against the petitioner?<\/p>\n

✓ Whether the conduct and statement of complainant are sufficient to reaching a conclusion that instant prosecution is malicious?<\/p>\n

Law Point<\/b><\/p>\n

✓ S. 377<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> – Unnatural offences<\/p>\n

“Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.<\/i><\/p>\n

Explanation — Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section.”<\/i><\/p>\n

Court’s Observation<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court observed that though the inherent power and jurisdiction provided under S. 482<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> has to be exercised sparingly and carefully with caution by the High Court but at the same time S. 482<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> empowers the High Court to prevent the abuse of process of court, therefore, the High Court can quash a proceeding, in exercise of its inherent power under S. 482<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, if such a proceeding is “frivolous, vexatious or oppressive”<\/b>.<\/p>\n

While relying on Rajiv Thapar<\/i> v. Madan Lal Kapoor<\/i>, (2013) 3 SCC 330<\/a>, the Court rejected the objection of the respondent to the present petition that the initial case was filed in 2016 and trial commenced and some of the witnesses have been examined, therefore, it is not proper to interfere in the matter and quash the FIR.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Navtej Singh Johar<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, (2018) 10 SCC 1<\/a>, where it was held that “Any act of the description covered under Section 377<\/a> IPC<\/a> done between two individuals without the consent of any one of them would invite penal liability under Section 377<\/a> IPC<\/a>”<\/b> and observed that the complainant has nowhere mentioned in the complaint that he had opposed the alleged abuse by the petitioner that was going on for three years; moreover, there was no restriction on the complainant to enter or leave the petitioner’s house. The Court further observed that even if the allegations made by the complainant are considered to be true, there is no evidence to prove that force was used by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that in the light of existing circumstances, both the petitioner and complainant are as consenting party and therefore, no offence under S. 377<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> is made out. While relying on various judgments of the Supreme Court, the Court observed that “this Court exercising the inherent jurisdiction for securing the ends of justice can quash the prosecution because considering the circumstances if prima facie this Court is of the opinion that there are feeble chances of ultimate conviction and no useful purpose is likely to serve by allowing the criminal prosecution to continue, the proceeding can be quashed.”<\/b><\/p>\n

In the light of facts and circumstance of the case, arguments advanced, material placed on record and authorities cited, the Court opined that the present complaint is “sugarcoated with ill-motive, made to belittle the image in society and casting a stigma on the name of high-up-place person, who also holds important portfolio in the State of M.P.”<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court observed that complainant’s admission regarding preparation of evidence, fact that the complaint was made after working together with the leaders of rival parties, complainant not being specific about threat given by the petitioner or conduct of the complainant as has been described by his father that the complainant is not mentally stable and has a habit of levelling false allegations against high ranking members of the society, clearly indicates that the complaint is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance due to private and personal grudge on the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Court’s Verdict<\/b><\/p>\n

While allowing the present petition, the Court quashed the FIR registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Ss. 377<\/a>, 506<\/a> and 34<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> on the grounds that offence under S. 377<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> not made out as it is a case of consent, moreover, in the present matter the prosecution of petitioner is malicious.<\/p>\n

[Raghavji v. State of M.P., 2023 SCC OnLine MP 1633<\/a>, order dated 14-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Sanjay Dwivedi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Shri Shashank Shekhar, Senior Advocate with Shri Bhupesh Tiwari, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n

L.A.S. Baghel, Government Advocate, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1\/State.<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The present case is “nothing but the assimilation of personal and political antipathies, more precisely, a politically oriented-animosity, which makes the petitioner’s prosecution malicious.”<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":291010,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[58674,7201,50352,19501,13021],"class_list":["post-295094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-justice-sanjay-dwivedi","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-quashment-of-fir","tag-section-377-ipc","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC quashes FIR under S 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR registered under Section 377 IPC against former minister Raghavji.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR registered under Section 377 IPC against former minister Raghavji.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-21T08:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-23T03:56:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC quashes FIR under S 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-21T08:00:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-23T03:56:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR registered under Section 377 IPC against former minister Raghavji.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC quashes FIR under S 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji | SCC Blog","description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR registered under Section 377 IPC against former minister Raghavji.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR registered under Section 377 IPC against former minister Raghavji.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-21T08:00:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-23T03:56:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","name":"MP HC quashes FIR under S 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-21T08:00:41+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-23T03:56:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR registered under Section 377 IPC against former minister Raghavji.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":321446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/04\/unnatural-sex-by-man-with-wife-residing-with-him-not-offence-under-section-377-ipc-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":295094,"position":0},"title":"Unnatural sex by husband with wife not offence under Section 377 IPC: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that under Section 375 of IPC any sexual intercourse or sexual act by the husband with his wife not below the age of fifteen years is not a rape, therefore, absence of consent of wife for unnatural act loses its importance.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/marital-rape-is-not-recognised-under-ipc-mp-high-court-upholds-husbands-discharge-from-charge-under-section-377-ipc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":295094,"position":1},"title":"\u201cMarital Rape is not recognised under IPC\u201d; MP High Court upholds husband\u2019s discharge from Section 377 IPC charge","author":"Ritu","date":"April 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe definition of \u2018rape\u2019 excludes acts between a man and his wife, not below the age of fifteen years, performed during the subsistence of a valid marriage.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-fir-allegation-against-rape-accused-not-abetment-of-suicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":295094,"position":2},"title":"Allegations in FIR against rape accused cannot be considered as abetment of suicide: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed the FIR and consequential criminal proceedings arising thereafter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349218,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/31\/forced-unnatural-sex-not-punishable-u-s-377-ipc-but-attracts-s-498-a-if-coupled-with-cruelty-assault-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":295094,"position":3},"title":"Forced Unnatural Sex not punishable under S. 377 IPC, but attracts S. 498-A if coupled with cruelty\/assault: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Cruelty under Section 498-A IPC does not necessarily require proof of dowry demands; physical or mental cruelty alone is sufficient.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297465,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/22\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quashes-pocso-case-by-assessing-prosecutrixs-decision-making-capacity\/","url_meta":{"origin":295094,"position":4},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes POCSO Case after assessing Prosecutrix’s decision-making capacity","author":"Ritu","date":"July 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed the impugned FIR and its subsequent criminal proceedings by the prosecutrix aged about 17 years 10 months.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/bom-consensual-sexual-gay-relationship-of-a-married-man-not-an-offence-under-section-377-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":295094,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | “Consensual Sexual Gay Relationship” of a married man — Ground for divorce; not an offence under S. 377 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Bench of Mridula Bhatkar, J. quashed and set aside the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge,\u00a0 refusing to discharge the petitioner\/accused from offence punishable under Section 377 of Penal Code, 1860. The present petition was filed in respect of challenging the order passed by the Metropolitan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295094\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}