{"id":294869,"date":"2023-06-17T18:00:27","date_gmt":"2023-06-17T12:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=294869"},"modified":"2023-06-17T17:55:20","modified_gmt":"2023-06-17T12:25:20","slug":"competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court<\/span>: In a case where Coal India Limited and its subsidiary Western Coalfields Limited had contended that they cannot be bound by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002783336\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Competition Act, 2002<\/a> as both are governed by the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973, the 3-judge bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">KM Joseph<\/span>*, BV Nagarathna and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ has rejected the contention and observed that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>&#8220;If Parliament has intended that State monopolies even if it be in the matter of distribution must come under the anvil of the new economic regime, it cannot be found flawed by the Court on the ground that subjecting the State monopoly would detract from the common good which the earlier Nationalisation Act when it was enacted, undoubtedly, succeeded in subserving. We see no reason to hold that a State Monopoly being run through the medium of a Government Company, even for attaining the goals in the Directive Principles, will go outside the purview of the Act.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was argued by the appellants that applying the Competition Act to the Monopolies would produce such anomalous results as would stultify the sublime goal enshrined in Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575241\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">39(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> as also Nationalisation Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While the Court agreed with the contention that the actions of the appellants can be challenged in proceedings in judicial review and that there may be forums other than the Competition Commission of India (CCI) such as the Controller of Coal whereunder redress may be sought against action of the appellants, it, however, held that such remedy by itself, cannot result in denial of access to a party complaining of contravention of a law which is otherwise applicable. &#8220;<i>It must also be remembered that action can also be taken by the CCI suo motu. Such is the width of the power vouchsafed for the authority under the Competition Act.<\/i>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also clarified that it is open to the appellant as the State monopoly to take up all contentions to demonstrate that there is no abuse of the dominant position. Be it differential pricing or a decision to limit or restrict production, if it is part of national policy or based on Presidential Directives and the appellant raises such a contention after bonafide following the Directives or policy themselves, it may be a matter, which the CCI would have to consider in deciding whether there is abuse of dominant position.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court explained that Section 19(4) in fact, empowers the CCI to have regard to &#8220;all&#8221; or &#8220;any&#8221; of the factors to arrive at the finding that an enterprise enjoys a dominant position or not. Section 19(4)(g) declares that &#8220;monopoly&#8221; or &#8220;dominant position&#8221;, whether acquired as a result of the Statute or by virtue of being a Government Company or a Public Sector Undertaking or otherwise, is to be a relevant factor. Hence, this is a clear indication that far from excluding governmental bodies like a government company, a public sector undertaking or a body under a Statute from the purview of the Act, the lawgiver has evinced its intention to include government companies, public sector companies and bodies acquired under a Statute within the ambit of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Government Departments are also expressly covered within the expression &#8216;enterprise&#39; under the Act. No doubt, Departments discharging sovereign functions are excluded but save those Government departments which are excluded, the Government Departments being State, are equally obliged to bear in mind the Directive Principles. The radical nature of the law contained in the Act has made a perceptible departure from the erstwhile law contained in the MRTP Act.<\/p>\n<p>The Court explained that what is excluded from the definition of the expression &#8216;enterprise&#39;, is a Government Department carrying on Government functions. Hence, carrying on business in mining, cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be described as a sovereign function. There is nothing in the definition which excludes a State monopoly which is even set up to achieve the goals in Article 39(b) of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>&#8220;It would involve elevating the appellants to a status above that of a Government Department to approve of the argument that Article 39(b), would allow the appellants to resist action under the Act, when it does not allow the Government Department, under which, in fact, the appellants operate to do so.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Holding that the appellants cannot resist the imposition of standards of fairness and the duty to avoid discriminatory practices when a specialized forum has been created by Parliament under the Act where also apart from the CCI being an expert body, it can seek and receive valuable inputs from experts and what is more, the matter is preceded by the report of Director General of Investigation, the Court also stated that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;The Competition Act cannot result in transforming the appellants into mere profit-making engines or require of them to be oblivious to their obligations under the Constitution. But that cannot equally mean that they can act with caprice, or unfairly or treat otherwise similarly situated persons or things with discrimination.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Coal India Limited v. Competition Commission of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jn6cJP3c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 740<\/a>, decided on 15-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by Justice KM Joseph<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Appellants: Senior Advocates K.K. Venugopal and Maninder Singh and Advocate Yaman Verma, For CCI: ASG N. Venkataraman<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Second Respondent: Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Coal India Limited and its subsidiary Western Coalfields Limited had contended that they cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 as both are governed by the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973. The Supreme Court held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":294873,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[57086,58601,18751,6661,29749,41175,58602,3684],"class_list":["post-294869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-coal-india-limited","tag-coal-mines-nationalization-act-competition-commission-of-india","tag-competition-act","tag-dominant-position","tag-government-companies","tag-public-sector-undertakings","tag-state-monopolies","tag-unfair_trade_practices"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Competition Act applies to Coal India Limited, holds SC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a setback to Coal India Limited, Supreme Court has held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a setback to Coal India Limited, Supreme Court has held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-17T12:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Competition Act applies to Coal India Limited, holds SC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-17T12:30:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"description\":\"In a setback to Coal India Limited, Supreme Court has held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"coal india\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Competition Act applies to Coal India Limited, holds SC | SCC Blog","description":"In a setback to Coal India Limited, Supreme Court has held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained","og_description":"In a setback to Coal India Limited, Supreme Court has held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-17T12:30:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/","name":"Competition Act applies to Coal India Limited, holds SC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-17T12:30:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"description":"In a setback to Coal India Limited, Supreme Court has held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"coal india"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254573,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/22\/scope-of-the-court-to-enquire-in-decision-of-an-executive\/","url_meta":{"origin":294869,"position":0},"title":"Scope of the Court to enquire in decision of an Executive: Whether Court is concerned with decision-making process or ultimate decision? Supreme Court throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising powers of judicial review, the Court is not concerned with the ultimate decision but the decision-making process.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":193684,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/04\/cabinet-approves-methodology-auction-coal-mines-blocks-sale-coal\/","url_meta":{"origin":294869,"position":1},"title":"Cabinet approves methodology for auction of coal mines\/blocks for sale of coal","author":"Saba","date":"March 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs has approved the methodology for auction of coal mines\/blocks for sale of coal under the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The opening up of commercial coal mining for private sector is the most\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7152,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/25\/coal-mines-special-provisions-bill-2015\/","url_meta":{"origin":294869,"position":2},"title":"Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Bill, 2015","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 20-03-2015, the Parliament passed the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Bill, 2015. Earlier, the Bill was passed by Lok Sabha on 04-03-2015. The objective of the Bill is to amend the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in order to remove\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":107811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/21\/hc-rejects-jindal-steels-plea-to-retain-coal-block-land-for-dumping-fly-ash\/","url_meta":{"origin":294869,"position":3},"title":"HC rejects Jindal Steel\u2019s plea to retain coal block land for dumping fly ash","author":"Saba","date":"February 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Single Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. has dismissed the petition of\u00a0Jindal Steel & Power Ltd seeking exclusion of an area of 298.913 hectares from the Gare Palma-IV\/1 coal mine, that JSPL contended was necessary for operation of its Dongamahua Captive\u00a0Power Plant. In 1996, JSPL was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":331232,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/competition-commission-of-india-jurisdiction-across-all-sectoral-boundaries\/","url_meta":{"origin":294869,"position":4},"title":"Competition Commission of India\u2019s Jurisdiction Across All Sectoral Boundaries","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Danish Khan* and Aakrit Aditya Sharma**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;DSK Legal&quot;","block_context":{"text":"DSK Legal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/dsk-legal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Competition Commission of India Jurisdiction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/03\/sc-directs-meghalaya-govt-to-deposit-rs-100-crore-fine-for-illegal-coal-mining\/","url_meta":{"origin":294869,"position":5},"title":"SC directs Meghalaya Govt to transfer Rs 100 Crore from MEPR Fund to CPCB for illegal coal mining [Full Report]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: \u201cNatural resources of the country are not meant to be consumed only by the present generation of men or women of the region where natural resources are deposited. These treasures of nature are for all generations to come and for intelligent use of the entire country.\u201d The bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294869\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/294873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}