{"id":294624,"date":"2023-06-15T09:00:07","date_gmt":"2023-06-15T03:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=294624"},"modified":"2023-06-23T10:33:54","modified_gmt":"2023-06-23T05:03:54","slug":"delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks ‘COKOTELLA’, ‘KINDTELLA’ and ‘MYTELLA’"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court<\/span>: A Single Judge Bench of C. Hari Shankar, J.* <\/span>noted that the manner of representation of the label with the defendants’ impugned product, where the unique manner of representation with first letter in black and the rest of the letters in the word in red colour was identical to the plaintiff’s product and thus, opined that a prima facie<\/i> case of infringement and passing off was made out and therefore, till the next date of hearing, the Court restrained the defendants from manufacturing, marketing, making available for sale, selling, and dealing in any manner whatsoever in the impugned products i.e., impugned products, \u2018COKOTELLA’, \u2018KINDTELLA’ and \u2018MYTELLA’ or any other deceptively similar mark or product not emanating from the plaintiffs’ or their authorized distributors and having identical or deceptively similar features of the plaintiffs’ trade marks NUTELLA and KINDER.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

The plaintiff, a company registered under the laws of Italy, submitted that, in 1964, the plaintiff coined the trade mark \u2018NUTELLA’, which it had been using continuously and extensively since then. The plaintiff also submitted that the \u2018NUTELLA’ product used a unique and distinctive packaging with a distinctive design, which acted as a source identifier for the plaintiff. The unique colour combination and logo of the plaintiff’s design as well as the jar in which the plaintiff sols its product was created in 1964. It was further submitted by the plaintiff that the trade mark \u2018KINDER’ was adopted by it in 1968 and had registrations in the marks \u2018KINDER’ and \u2018JOY’. The mark \u2018KINDER SURPRISE’ was adopted by the plaintiff in 1974 as an extension to the umbrella mark \u2018KINDER’ and, in 2001, the plaintiff adopted the trade mark \u2018KINDER JOY’, to sell distinctive egg-shaped children’s confectionary, with the item accompanied by a toy.<\/p>\n

The defendants were engaged in the manufacture and sale of confectionary products, inter alia, for children. In May 2023, the plaintiff came across a YouTube video, uploaded by a third party, advertising the defendants’ product, \u2018COKOTELLA’, using a label and colour combination which was deceptively similar to the label and colour combination used by the plaintiff for its device mark \u2018NUTELLA’. Thus, the plaintiff had instituted the present suit against the defendants, seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants as well as all others acting on their behalf from using and selling its products \u2018COKOTELLA’, \u2018KINDELLA’ and \u2018MYTELLA’ in the impugned packaging’s and from using the impugned trade mark or any other trade mark which was deceptively similar to the \u2018NUTELLA’ and \u2018KINDER’ trade mark of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

Submissions on behalf of the Plaintiff<\/p>\n

It was submitted that the defendant had merely created a combination of \u2018KIND’ being the first part of the word \u2018KINDER ‘, and \u2018ELLA’ being the latter half of the word \u2018NUTELLA’ to create the mark \u2018KINDELLA ‘, to be used in a manner deceptively similar to the manner in which the plaintiff used the mark. Further, it was submitted that the use of the concluding syllable \u2018ELLA’ rendered the impugned marks phonetically as well as otherwise deceptively similar to the mark of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

It was further submitted that earlier plaintiff had instituted a suit against the defendant, in which the plaintiff had sued the defendant for selling its product \u2018MOTU PATLU’ in egg-shaped packages similar to those in which the plaintiff was selling the products using its \u2018KINDER’ trade mark and the said suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff in 2019 and the Court had also declared the mark \u2018KINDER’ as a well-known trade mark within the meaning of Section 2(1)(zg)<\/a> of the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Similarities between the plaintiff and the defendants’ labels:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n
\n

Manner of use by the Plaintiff<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Manner of use by the Defendants<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court noted that there were following similarities between the plaintiff’s and the defendants’ products:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    The plaintiffs’ product name and trade mark was \u2018NUTELLA ‘, whereas the defendants’ impugned product was being sold under the mark \u2018KINDELLA’ and was made up of the plaintiffs’ well-known trade mark \u2018KIND<\/span>ER’ + \u2018NUTELLA<\/span> ‘. Moreover, the manner of representation of the \"\"\"\", label with the defendants’ impugned product\"\", where the unique manner of representation with first letter in black and the rest of the letters in the word in red colour was identical. The manner of representation of the term \"\"was also identical. The term \"\"had been replaced with the term which was written in an identical colour and a nearly identical font.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    The manner of representation of the label with the defendants’ impugned product, where the unique manner of representation with first letter in black and the rest of the letters in the word in red colour was identical.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    A jar of milk kept on the side, along with two hazelnuts and a unique yellow flower(s) and leaves, was nearly identical.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Court opined that a prima facie<\/i> case of infringement and passing off was made out and therefore, till the next date of hearing, the Court restrained the defendants as well as all others acting on their behalf from manufacturing, marketing, making available for sale, selling, and dealing in any manner whatsoever in the impugned products i.e., impugned products, \u2018COKOTELLA’\"\", \"\", \u2018KINDELLA’,\"\",\"\", and \u2018MYTELLA’,\"\"\"\", or any other deceptively similar mark or product not emanating from the plaintiffs’ or their authorized distributors and having identical or deceptively similar features of the plaintiffs’ trade marks NUTELLA,\"\",\"\", KINDER, etc.<\/p>\n

    The matter would next be listed on 6-9-2023.<\/p>\n

    [Ferrero Spa v. Kamco Chew Food (P) Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine Del 3625<\/a>, Order dated 2-6-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    \n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For the Plaintiffs: Pravin Anand, Vaishali Mittal, Shivang Sharma, Advocates<\/p>\n

    For the Defendants: Shailen Bhatia, Amit Jain, Raghav Bhalla, Sheril Bhatia, Sreelakshmi Menon, Advocates<\/p>\n

    *Judgment authored by: Justice C. Hari Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The manner of representation of the label with the defendants’ impugned product, where the unique manner of representation with first letter in black and the rest of the letters in the word in red colour is identical.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":294662,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[58521,2543,58519,58518,58522,58523,58517,2616,58520],"class_list":["post-294624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cokotella","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-joy","tag-kinder","tag-kindtella","tag-mytella","tag-nutella","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-umbrella-mark"],"yoast_head":"\n[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi HC restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA\u2019, \u2018KINDTELLA\u2019 and \u2018MYTELLA\u2019<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA ', \u2018KINDTELLA' and \u2018MYTELLA'.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks 'COKOTELLA', 'KINDTELLA' and 'MYTELLA'\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA ', \u2018KINDTELLA' and \u2018MYTELLA'.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-15T03:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-23T05:03:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks 'COKOTELLA', 'KINDTELLA' and 'MYTELLA'\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi HC restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA\u2019, \u2018KINDTELLA\u2019 and \u2018MYTELLA\u2019\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-15T03:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-23T05:03:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA ', \u2018KINDTELLA' and \u2018MYTELLA'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"nutella\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks ‘COKOTELLA’, ‘KINDTELLA’ and ‘MYTELLA’\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi HC restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA\u2019, \u2018KINDTELLA\u2019 and \u2018MYTELLA\u2019","description":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA ', \u2018KINDTELLA' and \u2018MYTELLA'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks 'COKOTELLA', 'KINDTELLA' and 'MYTELLA'","og_description":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA ', \u2018KINDTELLA' and \u2018MYTELLA'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-15T03:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-23T05:03:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks 'COKOTELLA', 'KINDTELLA' and 'MYTELLA'","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/","name":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi HC restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA\u2019, \u2018KINDTELLA\u2019 and \u2018MYTELLA\u2019","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-15T03:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-23T05:03:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks \u2018COKOTELLA ', \u2018KINDTELLA' and \u2018MYTELLA'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"nutella"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/15\/delhi-hc-restrains-kamco-chew-foods-from-using-marks-cokotella-kindtella-and-mytella-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[NUTELLA\/KINDER v. KINDTELLA] Delhi High Court restrains Kamco Chew Foods from using marks ‘COKOTELLA’, ‘KINDTELLA’ and ‘MYTELLA’"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nutella.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/01\/delhi-hc-declares-nutella-as-well-known-trade-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":294624,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court declares \u2018NUTELLA\u2019 as a well-known trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court while dealing with edible items for human consumption, owes a duty of exercising a greater degree of care, caution as also to apply a more stringent test to avoid any possibility\/likelihood of confusion between different edible products amongst the general public.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Nutella well-known trade mark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nutella-well-known-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nutella-well-known-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nutella-well-known-trade-mark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nutella-well-known-trade-mark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":294624,"position":1},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":265360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/red-bull-sting-pespi-trademark-infringement-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":294624,"position":2},"title":"Red Bull v. Sting | Injunction application against Pepsico\u2019s tagline \u201cSTIMULATES MIND ENERGIZES BODY\u201d: Whether Pepsi has committed infringement? Del HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Amit Bansal, J., observed that the taglines of \u2018Red Bull\u2019 and \u2018Sting\u2019 are descriptive and laudatory in nature. Interim injunction against the defendants, restraining the defendants from using the tagline \u201cSTIMULATES MIND ENERGIZES BODY\u201d, was sought as it was deceptively similar to the plaintiff\u2019s registered trademark\/tagline \u201cVITALIZES\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-of-boeing-company-legal-updates-research-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":294624,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Advance Technologies from using logo similar to The Boeing Company; Directs costs upto 5 lakhs","author":"Arunima","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that customers are being misled by the defendants and the entire effort is deliberate and dishonest amounting to dilution of the reputation and goodwill of the trademark\/logo of the plaintiffs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290854,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/28\/delhi-high-court-restrains-samaira-jewels-from-counterfeiting-bvlgari-jewelry-collection-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":294624,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Samaira Jewels from counterfeiting BVLGARI jewelry collection","author":"Editor","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court stated that a bare glance at the goods sold by the defendants indicated that they are prima facie imitations of the plaintiff\u2019s registered design and accordingly injuncted Samaira Jewels from the usage of such designs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-calvin-klein-for-its-marks-used-for-perfumes-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":294624,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Calvin Klein for marks \u2018CK\u2019, \u2018Calvin Klein\u2019, \u2018ck one\u2019 used for perfumes","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTesters are being sold by the defendants, Xeryus Retail (P) Ltd. masquerading them as perfumes of the plaintiff, Coty Germany GMBH for sale, thereby, luring customers into paying money for such testers which are otherwise, not to be commercially dispensed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294624\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/294662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}