{"id":294467,"date":"2023-06-13T12:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-06-13T06:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=294467"},"modified":"2023-06-16T09:42:19","modified_gmt":"2023-06-16T04:12:19","slug":"extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Kerala High Court:<\/b> In a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) challenging order dated 23-3-2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge allowing application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570316\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36-A(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985<\/a> (&#8216;NDPS Act&#8217;) allowing detention of accused for another 180 days without informing the accused or his counsel to affirm information regarding pendency of such application, Raja Vijayaraghavan V. quashed the orders allowing extended detention and dismissal of bail, and released the accused on regular bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was alleged that the Additional Sessions Judge failed to act in accordance with the provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570316\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36-A(4)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NDPS Act<\/a> by extending detention of the accused for a further period of 180 days without informing him about filing of such an application and giving a chance to object to the same.<\/p>\n<h2>Court&#8217;s Analysis on Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court scrutinized Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570316\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36A(4)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NDPS Act<\/a> which requires investigation in NDPS matters to be completed within 180 days&#8217; period instead of 90 days as against Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519406\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">167(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, which may be extendable to a period of 1 year if specific reasons are provided as laid in <i>M. Ravindran<\/i> v. <i>Directorate of Revenue Intelligence<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Rb1juog0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2021) 2 SCC 485<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further pointed towards the <i>pari materia<\/i> proviso of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546618\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20(4)(bb)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002875770\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987<\/a> (&#8216;repealed TADA Act&#8217;) which empowers the Court to extend period mentioned under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519406\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">167<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. The same was considered in <i>Hitendra Vishnu Thakur<\/i> v. <i>State of Maharashtra<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/w2wsv3r0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1994) 4 SCC 602<\/a> wherein, the Court talked about submission of the investigating agency to the scrutiny of public prosecutor in the first instance and to satisfy him with the progress in investigation while furnishing reasons for seeking further custody of the accused, who in turn applies his mind before submitting a report before the Court. It was further held that &#8220;if any extension is granted under clause (bb), the accused must be put on notice and permitted to have his say so as to be able to object to the grant of extension.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding requirement of such notice to be in written form, the Court relied on <i>Sanjay Dutt<\/i> v. <i>State through CBI, Bombay (II)<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/MAax5WAx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1994) 5 SCC 410<\/a>, wherein, the Court held that &#8220;All that is contemplated to safeguard the rights of the accused is the production of the accused in court and the furnishing of information that the question of extension for the period for completing the investigation is being considered.&#8221; Further, in <i>Jigar<\/i> v. <i>State of Gujarat<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/aGK011yc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 1290<\/a>, the Court regarded the failure to inform the applicant regarding consideration of extension of custody by the Public Prosecutor not a mere procedural irregularity but gross illegality.<\/p>\n<h2>Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the impugned order merely stated that the accused was informed through the Jail Superintendent, although was virtually present, there was no confirmation on the accused actually being informed about the said application and given the option to object. The Court pointed that the application was filed on 176th day and the impugned orders were passed on the very next day and said that &#8220;There was no tearing hurry to dispose of the matter as few more days were left to reach the cutoff date of 180 days.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found the impugned order illegal due to failure to inform the accused regarding filing of application and his right to object. It further said that dismissal of application for statutory bail through order dated 31-3-2023 cannot be sustained in law. The Court quashed both the orders, i.e., the one allowing extension of custody and dismissal of application for bail by the accused. The Court released the accused on default bail under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519406\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">167(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> while stating a set of conditions to be satisfied.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sabarinath v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/f92rtlTl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Ker 3666<\/a>, Order dated 2-6-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Order by: Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V.<\/b><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Advocate M.J. Santhosh, Advocate Arun Antony;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Senior Public Prosecutor Vipin Narayan.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Kerala High Court pointed that the application was filed on 176th day and the impugned orders were passed on the very next day, while the Court still had a few days to decide.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293587,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2523,21061,58458],"class_list":["post-294467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-ndps-act","tag-section-36a4-of-ndps-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Extending Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act illegal if accused not informed: Kerala HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court reiterated that Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet under Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act is illegal if accused not informed.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court reiterated that Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet under Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act is illegal if accused not informed.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-13T06:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-16T04:12:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Extending Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act illegal if accused not informed: Kerala HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-13T06:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-16T04:12:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court reiterated that Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet under Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act is illegal if accused not informed.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"kerala high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Extending Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act illegal if accused not informed: Kerala HC | SCC Blog","description":"Kerala High Court reiterated that Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet under Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act is illegal if accused not informed.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates","og_description":"Kerala High Court reiterated that Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet under Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act is illegal if accused not informed.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-13T06:30:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-16T04:12:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/","name":"Extending Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act illegal if accused not informed: Kerala HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-13T06:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-16T04:12:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Kerala High Court reiterated that Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet under Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act is illegal if accused not informed.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"kerala high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/extending-time-limit-for-filing-chargesheet-in-ndps-act-illegal-accused-not-informed-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act] Extension of Time Limit for Filing Chargesheet in NDPS Act, illegal if accused not duly informed: Kerala High Court reiterates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355218,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/01\/kerala-hc-grants-bail-ndps-case-as-grounds-for-arrest-not-communicated\/","url_meta":{"origin":294467,"position":0},"title":"\u2018No grounds for arrest communicated in arrest intimation or memo\u2019; Kerala HC grants bail in NDPS case","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNeither in the arrest intimation nor in the arrest memo is there anything to indicate that the grounds for arrest were communicated to the accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala HC NDPS bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310646,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/03\/important-ndps-decisions-supreme-court-high-courts-2023\/","url_meta":{"origin":294467,"position":1},"title":"Important NDPS Decisions by Supreme Court and High Courts in 2023","author":"Ridhi","date":"January 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If you are in search of important NDPS Supreme Court judgments, orders of 2023, or for that matter, the judgments and orders of High Courts related to specific aspects of NDPS Act, this blog provides important matters covered in 2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NDPS decisions Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/NDPS-decisions-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/NDPS-decisions-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/NDPS-decisions-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/NDPS-decisions-Supreme-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339460,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/21\/magic-mushroom-not-scheduled-narcotic-psychotropic-substance-kerala-hc-grants-bail-to-ndps-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":294467,"position":2},"title":"Magic mushroom not a scheduled narcotic or psychotropic substance: Kerala HC grants bail to NDPS accused","author":"Arushi","date":"January 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, since the charas and ganja seized from the accused were of small quantities, the question to be decided by the Court is whether the mushroom and magic mushroom capsules together can be considered as commercial quantity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378592,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/17\/important-ndps-judgments-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":294467,"position":3},"title":"Top NDPS Judgments of 2025: Bail, Detention, Evidence &amp; Procedural Safeguards","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"March 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A consolidated look at how Supreme Court and High Courts interpreted the NDPS Act in 2025 \u2014 from bail and procedural safeguards to detention, evidence standards and evolving issues around possession, quantity, FSL reports, and foreign nationals.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NDPS judgments 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-70-14.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/01\/prima-facie-findings-bail-orders-not-binding-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":294467,"position":4},"title":"Prima facie findings in bail orders not binding on Trial Court or Investigating officer: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court said that when a question of law or a point on merit is raised by the accused in a bail application, it is the duty of the bail court to decide that point. But that decision will be a prima facie finding at the bail application stage.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/12\/kerala-court-acquits-actor-shine-tom-chacko-six-others-in-ndps-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":294467,"position":5},"title":"Kerala Court acquits actor Shine Tom Chacko and six others in 2015 NDPS case","author":"Arushi","date":"February 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Shine Tom Chacko and others were arrested by the police, suspecting cocaine and other narcotic substances use during a party.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"actor Shine Tom Chacko acquitted","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/actor-Shine-Tom-Chacko-acquitted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/actor-Shine-Tom-Chacko-acquitted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/actor-Shine-Tom-Chacko-acquitted.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/actor-Shine-Tom-Chacko-acquitted.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294467\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}