{"id":294279,"date":"2023-06-09T15:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-06-09T09:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=294279"},"modified":"2023-06-14T13:22:03","modified_gmt":"2023-06-14T07:52:03","slug":"determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Kerala High Court:<\/b> In a writ petition seeking directions to Kerala State Housing Board (&#8216;KSHB&#8217;) authorities to disburse DCRG as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4(3)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Payment of Gratuity Act (1972 Act)<\/a> as amended in 2010 along with 9% interest for 9 years and 11 months on gratuity amount, while he retired from service on 31-5-2002, Murali Purushothaman, J. clarified that gratuity has to be determined from the date of termination of employment and not the date of disbursement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner retired as the Regional Engineer from KSHB on 31-5-2002. The Secretary of KHSB sanctioned pensionary benefits for the petitioner by proceedings dated 20-5-2006 but withheld his Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity (&#8216;DCRG&#8217;) amounting to Rs. 2,57,400, and also, the last payment for May 2002 amounting to Rs 21,712 towards his liability on account of audit objections.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner approached the Court against the same, wherein, the Court directed the Board to disburse the withheld DCRG along with the salary of May 2002 within a month. The Court also left it open for the petitioner to claim interest for the delay in disbursement of DCRG and May 2002 pay. The KSHB through proceedings dated 4-4-2012 accorded sanction for payment of DCRG and May 2002 salary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner through the instant petition complained of disbursement of DCRG according to the &#8216;then existing rule&#8217; when he retired, and that he was entitled to maximum gratuity of Rs 10 lakhs, based on 2010 amendment to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4(3)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a>, which came into effect from 17-5-2010. The petitioner sought directions to the authorities to disburse DCRG in accordance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4(3)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a> as amended through 2010 amendment along with 9% interest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the petitioner being an employee of KSHB was regulated by the Kerala State Housing Board Employees&#8217; (Pension and other Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990 (&#8216;KSR&#8217;). The Court scrutinized Regulation 4, Rule 68 regarding pension and other retirement benefits, amount of gratuity payable and pointed out that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555927\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a> shall have over-riding effect. The Court expressed that &#8220;the employees of KHSB can claim gratuity as per Section 4(3), however, they cannot claim gratuity available under the KSR in such cases.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also clarified that if an employee claims gratuity under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a>, payment of gratuity is payable at the rate of 15 days&#8217; wages in accordance with Section 4 for each year of service completed, subject to a maximum amount notified by the Central Government. It further said that if the employee claims DCRG as per KSR, gratuity has to be determined under Rule 68 of Part III of KSR. Thus, it was accordingly specified that &#8220;The amount of gratuity will be one half of the &#8216;emoluments&#8217; of an employee for each completed year of qualifying service subject to a maximum of 16&#189; times the &#8217;emoluments&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a> requires payment of gratuity to an employee on termination of employment, which was 31-5-2002 in the instant case. Thus, the gratuity shall be payable with effect from the same day, i.e., 31-5-2002. The Court suggested that the petitioner has to choose between <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a> and KSR for claim of gratuity or DCRG, since he cannot have gratuity under the KSR with the ceiling limit payable under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that even if the petitioner claims gratuity under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a>, the maximum amount of gratuity payable must be determined according to the date on which gratuity became payable and not when the sanction was accorded for payment of DCRG or on the date of actual disbursement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court did not find any merit in the petitioner&#8217;s contention of being entitled to maximum gratuity of Rs 10 lakhs based on 2010 amendment to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1972 Act<\/a>. However, the Court left it open for the petitioner to claim interest for delay in disbursement of DCRG.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">K. Rajendra Prasad v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kJj1I4RK\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Ker 3821<\/a>, decided on 22-5-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Judgment by: Justice Murali Purushothaman<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Advocate Rajan Joseph, Advocate Koshy George;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Senior Government Pleader C.N. Prabhakaran, Advocate George Boban, Advocate K. Denny Devassy, Advocate Manoj Ramaswamy, Advocate T.K. Sajeev.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Kerala High Court suggested the petitioner to choose between <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002767706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972<\/a> and Kerala State Housing Board Employees&#8217; (Pension and other Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990 for claim of gratuity or DCRG, since he cannot have gratuity under one with the ceiling limit payable under another Act.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293587,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[58365,9081,2523,58366,20771],"class_list":["post-294279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-determination-of-gratuity","tag-gratuity","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-kerala-state-housing-board","tag-payment-of-gratuity-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Determination of gratuity done from date of termination of employment: Kerala HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court clarified that determination of gratuity is done from the date of termination of employment and not sanction or actual disbursement.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court clarified that determination of gratuity is done from the date of termination of employment and not sanction or actual disbursement.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-09T09:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-14T07:52:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Determination of gratuity done from date of termination of employment: Kerala HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-09T09:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-14T07:52:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court clarified that determination of gratuity is done from the date of termination of employment and not sanction or actual disbursement.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"kerala high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Determination of gratuity done from date of termination of employment: Kerala HC | SCC Blog","description":"Kerala High Court clarified that determination of gratuity is done from the date of termination of employment and not sanction or actual disbursement.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court","og_description":"Kerala High Court clarified that determination of gratuity is done from the date of termination of employment and not sanction or actual disbursement.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-09T09:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-14T07:52:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","name":"Determination of gratuity done from date of termination of employment: Kerala HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-09T09:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-14T07:52:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Kerala High Court clarified that determination of gratuity is done from the date of termination of employment and not sanction or actual disbursement.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"kerala high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/under-the-payment-of-gratuity-act-a-delay-cannot-be-condoned-by-taking-the-aid-of-the-provisions-of-the-limitation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":294279,"position":0},"title":"Delay cannot be condoned under Payment of Gratuity Act by taking the aid of the provisions of Limitation Act: Kerala High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court perused Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and held that the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act cannot condone the delay in filing an appeal by entertaining an application under Limitation Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":314084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/when-payment-of-gratuity-act-is-applicable-in-establishment-calculation-to-be-made-as-per-limits-prescribed-by-central-govt-tripura-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":294279,"position":1},"title":"Calculation must be made as per limits prescribed by Central Govt from time to time in case Payment of Gratuity is applicable on any establishment: Tripura HC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 4(5) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is indicative of fact that the Act being a beneficial legislation, entitlement of employee cannot be reduced below the prescribed ceiling limit under Section 4(3) of Act, rather this provision approves receiving of a better gratuity than what is notified by Central\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tripura high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302541,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/27\/agreement-cannot-override-statutory-gratuity-payment-obligations-under-payment-of-gratuity-act-1972-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":294279,"position":2},"title":"Agreement\/Settlement cannot override statutory Gratuity payment obligations under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the contradiction between agreement and provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rendered the agreement unenforceable in terms of payment of gratuity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200171,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/16\/forfeiture-of-gratuity-is-not-automatic-on-dismissal-from-service-is-subject-to-section-45-6-of-payment-of-gratuity-act-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":294279,"position":3},"title":"Forfeiture of gratuity is not automatic on dismissal from service, is subject to Section 4(5) &#038; (6) of Payment of Gratuity Act: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Kurian Joseph, J. delivered the judgment for himself and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. wherein it was held that forfeiture of gratuity, under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is not automatic on dismissal from service. The respondent, an employee of the appellant bank, was dismissed on account of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":146321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delay-in-payment-of-gratuity-entitled-to-get-interest-on-that-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":294279,"position":4},"title":"Delay in payment of gratuity, entitled to get interest on that delay","author":"Saba","date":"August 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: The petition has been filed by the primary school assistant teacher asking for interest on the gratuity amount which was released to his account after a long delay. The petitioner retired from the position of primary school assistant teacher on 31.7.2002, and his gratuity amount which is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213578,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/12\/ker-hc-retired-employee-having-a-criminal-case-pending-against-him-in-vigilance-court-entitled-to-payment-of-provisional-pension-only-till-disposal-of-the-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":294279,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Retired employee having a criminal case pending against him in Vigilance Court entitled to payment of provisional pension only till disposal of the case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A.M. Babu and V. Chitambaresh, JJ. allowed a petition preferred by the State against the order of Administrative Tribunal granting disbursal of full retirement benefits to an employee who had a criminal case pending against him. Respondent herein, an Additional Tahsildar, was suspended\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294279\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}