{"id":294254,"date":"2023-06-09T12:00:52","date_gmt":"2023-06-09T06:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=294254"},"modified":"2023-06-09T09:51:27","modified_gmt":"2023-06-09T04:21:27","slug":"calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/b> The single judge bench of Bibek Chaudhuri<\/b>,* J. has held that an application under S. 143-A<\/a> of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> is not needed to be disposed of on the date of examination of the accused under S. 251<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, the same can be disposed of at any point of time.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the opposite party-complainant filed a complaint against the petitioner-accused under S. 138<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> when the complainant deposited the cheque issued by the petitioner as the payment for the order of N-95 (5 layers) Mask and Surgical Mask for encashment and the same was dishonored due to insufficiency of fund. The complainant was examined under S. 200<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> and filed her evidence on affidavit in terms of S. 145(1)<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Judicial Magistrate vide order dated 07-10-2021, allowed the application filed by the complainant under S. 143-A<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> for payment of interim compensation by the accused without mentioning any mode of payment. The accused was examined under S. 251<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> and the Judicial Magistrate vide order dated 03-12-2021, refused the accused petition praying for modification of the order dated 07-10-2021 and fixed the next date of the hearing on 15-03-2022.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved by the impugned orders dated 07-10-2021 and 03-12-2021 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, the accused preferred the present revision application and contended that the Judicial Magistrate made an error in passing the impugned orders as the application under S. 143-A<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> was not heard and disposed of.<\/p>\n

Observation<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court observed that S. 143-A(a) and (b)<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> empowers the Court to order the drawer of the cheque to pay interim compensation to the complainant where the accused pleads not guilty to the accusations made in the complaint.<\/p>\n

The Court remarked that it is not mandatory that on the date of examination of the accused under S. 251<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, the application under S. 143-A<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> should be disposed of, it can be disposed of at any point of time.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the accused’s opportunity to cross-examine the complainant (PW1) was taken away from him by fixing the next date for examination of the accused under S. 313<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> and hearing of the petition under S. 143-A<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Verdict<\/b><\/p>\n

While disposing of the present revision, the Court, for ends of justice, directed the Trial Court to give opportunity to the accused to cross-examine PW1 and disposed of the application under S. 143-A<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> without giving any adjournment to either of the parties.<\/p>\n

[Susanta Chakraborty v. Dey’s Construction, 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 1045<\/a>, order dated 04-05-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Bibek Chaudhuri<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Sayan Chattapadhyay and Ms. Payel Shome, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n

Mr. Debasis Kar and Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury, Counsel for the Opposite Party.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Section 143A empowers a Court to pass an order on interim compensation in favour of the complainant where the accused pleads not guilty to the accusations made in the complaint.”<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,58358,35967,50074],"class_list":["post-294254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-examination-of-the-accused","tag-interim-compensation","tag-negotiable-instruments-act-1881"],"yoast_head":"\nNo mandatory disposal of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court held that it is not mandatory to dispose of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 of CrPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court held that it is not mandatory to dispose of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 of CrPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-09T06:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"No mandatory disposal of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-09T06:30:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court held that it is not mandatory to dispose of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 of CrPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No mandatory disposal of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court held that it is not mandatory to dispose of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 of CrPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court","og_description":"Calcutta High Court held that it is not mandatory to dispose of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 of CrPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-09T06:30:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","name":"No mandatory disposal of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-09T06:30:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court held that it is not mandatory to dispose of application under Section 143A of NI Act before examination of the accused under Section 251 of CrPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/dishonour-of-cheque-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":294254,"position":0},"title":"Dishonour of Cheque | Is it mandatory for trial court to award interim compensation under S. 143-A NI Act on mere invocation thereof? Del HC decides whether S. 143-A is directory or mandatory?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Anu Malhotra, J., held that the provision of Section 143A of the NI Act, 1881 is directory in nature and not mandatory. Petitioners were stated to be the directors as per the complaints i.e. CC NI Act 12-20 and CC NI Act 100-20 filed by the respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/magistrate-required-to-exercise-judicious-discretion-before-ordering-interim-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":294254,"position":1},"title":"Magistrate required to exercise judicious discretion before ordering interim compensation, S. 143-A NI Act not mandatory: Kar HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Rajendra Badamikar, J.,\u00a0reversed an order of the Magistrate which had directed the petitioner accused to deposit 20% of the cheque amount before the court. The High Court said that Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is not a mandatory provision. Factual Matrix The respondent herein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/section143a-ni-act-section-138-interim-compenation-failure-to-deposit-punishment-denial-of-right-to-cross-examination-dishonour-cheque-supreme-court-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":294254,"position":2},"title":"Right to cross-examination cannot be denied as a punishment for failure to deposit interim compensation under Section 143A NI Act: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where an offender under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) was denied the right to cross-examine a witness upon failure to deposit the interim compensation under Section 143A of NI Act, the bench of UU Lalit*, S. Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/04\/negotiable-instruments-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":294254,"position":3},"title":"[NI Act] Kar HC decides contours of law in a classic case where cash of Rs 2 crore was borrowed as hand loan and a cheque obtained for the repayment of the same got dishonoured","author":"Editor","date":"April 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M. Nagaprasanna, J. allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order regarding attachment of property and auction notification. The facts of the case is such that the complainant claims to have lent to the accused a sum of rupees two crores by cash in two thousand rupees\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":312686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/01\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-accused-directors-liability-under-negotiable-instruments-act-1881-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":294254,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds accused directors\u2019 liability under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; set asides warrant against company for being a juridical person","author":"Ritu","date":"February 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that a juridical person cannot be physically apprehended, and such an order is not executable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/23\/no-conviction-solely-based-on-accuseds-statements-under-section-313-of-crpc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":294254,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No conviction solely based on accused\u2019s statements under Section 313 of CrPC\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the impugned notice has not been produced before the Court, thus not proved, the case's foundation is wrong and thus not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294254\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}