{"id":293654,"date":"2023-06-02T11:30:31","date_gmt":"2023-06-02T06:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=293654"},"modified":"2023-06-07T15:48:28","modified_gmt":"2023-06-07T10:18:28","slug":"delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court:<\/b> A suit was filed by Bennet Coleman &amp; Company Limited (plaintiff) seeking to restrain E Entertainment Television (defendants) its directors, agents, officers, employees, cable operators, multisystem operators, direct-to-home operators, E-NEWS and other persons associated with it from adopting and using the mark &#8220;NOW&#8221;, &#8220;E NOW&#8221; and &#8220;E NEWS NOW&#8221; or any other mark or name which is identical or deceptively similar, either singly or in conjunction with any other word or mark, to plaintiff&#8217;s channel name\/ registered mark, or\/ and the plaintiff mark&#8217;s logo style, format, font, get up or color scheme. Mukta Gupta, J., held that the plaintiff cannot be permitted to claim that the word &#8216;NOW&#8217; used by it as a prefix or suffix has acquired a distinction, therefore, the defendant who is a prior user of mark &#8216;E&#8217; or &#8216;E!&#8217; with &#8216;NOW&#8217; and &#8216;E NEWS NOW&#8217; cannot be injuncted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff company is popularly known as the &#8216;Times Group&#8217; which primarily runs print media since 1838 and is the flagship company of the Times Group Company. It is claimed by the plaintiff that the trademarks &#8220;TIME&#8221;, &#8220;TIMES&#8221; and &#8220;NOW&#8221; are the property of the plaintiff company only, and its subsidiaries and affiliates have been allowed to use the same. The plaintiff has been using the series of mark &#8220;TIMES&#8221; and &#8220;NOW&#8221; in various combinations, for television channels for more than a decade like &#8216;Times Now&#8217; channel, &#8216;Times Now World&#8217; &#8216;ET Now&#8217; channel, &#8216;Mirror Now&#8217;, &#8216;ROMEDY Now&#8217;. The suffix &#8220;NOW&#8221; is thus attached to all the channels of the plaintiff except few like &#8216;Zoom&#8217;, &#8216;MN+&#8217;, &#8216;MNX&#8217; and &#8216;MNX HD&#8217; operated by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It is the case of the plaintiff that on and from 13-10-2008, it started using the logo &#8220;E Now&#8221; for entertainment and film review shows where &#8220;E&#8221; represents Entertainment and &#8220;NOW&#8221; represents a connection with the brand of Times Group. The plaintiff decided to launch a new logo of &#8220;E Now&#8221; and applied for registration of the trademark along with the application for trademark registration of the old logo and the word mark &#8220;E Now&#8221; was also applied. The plaintiff has been using the &#8216;E NOW&#8217; since 2008, the &#8220;NOW&#8221; mark is per se registered and it is an essential feature of the plaintiff&#8217;s mark The present suit is limited to class 38 and 41 of the trademark registrations which pertain to &#8220;television broadcasting services&#8221; and &#8220;television-based entertainment services&#8221; respectively.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As per the defendant, it is an American pay television channel owned by the NBC Universal Cable Entertainment Group Division of NBC Universal Media LLC, which is a global media and entertainment conglomerate with presence in various countries. It runs various programs, shows and activities under mark &#8220;E!&#8221; and E! formative marks such as &#8220;E! Entertainment&#8221;, &#8220;E! Online&#8221;, &#8220;E! News&#8221;, &#8220;E! HD&#8221;, etc. The defendant used the name &#8220;E! News Now&#8221; for a digital\/ online news segment\/ bulletin around the year 2007, and &#8220;E! Now&#8221; online television. It was the case of the defendant that the earliest registration of the mark &#8220;NOW&#8221; by the plaintiff is of 31-07-2008 which is after the date of use of &#8220;E! News Now&#8221; by the defendant, and hence, the &#8220;NOW&#8221; label and marks have been wrongly registered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the plaintiff is not the proprietor of the standalone trademark &#8220;NOW&#8221; nor prior user of the said mark in Class-38. Further, the stand-alone registration of the plaintiff in Class-41 is of 18-09-2014 on the proposed to-be-used basis and has not been used till date. Thus, the registration of &#8220;NOW&#8221; simpliciter in Class-41 cannot be used to seek an injunction against the defendant&#8217;s mark &#8220;E! Now&#8221; and &#8220;E! New Now&#8221; and the defendant&#8217;s first use of &#8220;E-News Now&#8221; is since 30-09-2007.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that though the plaintiff has several registrations with the suffix and prefix &#8220;NOW&#8221;, it is a common word and is used by several other entities. Further, the plaintiff&#8217;s own stand is that the mark &#8220;NOW&#8221; is common to trade in response to the examination report for ROMEDY NOW under Class-9, and the counter statement in relation to the opposition filed against the mark &#8220;NOW&#8223; under Class-9. The plaintiff also gave a disclaimer on &#8220;NOW&#8221; in registration for LOVCOM in Class-9, LOVCOM NOW in Class-16 and ROMEDY NOW in Class-38.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the plaintiff cannot be permitted to claim that the word &#8220;NOW&#8221; used by it as a prefix or suffix has acquired a distinction. Therefore, the defendant who is a prior user of mark &#8220;E&#8221; or &#8220;E!&#8221; with &#8220;NOW&#8221; and &#8220;E NEWS NOW&#8221; cannot be injuncted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Bennet Coleman and Company Limited v E Entertainment Television LLC, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pZO11GqY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 3339<\/a>, decided on 31-05-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Pragya Jain, Ms. Soumya Khandelwal, Advocates for the Plaintiff;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Ms. Shwetashree Majumdar, Mr. Prithvi Singh and Ms.Devyani Nath, Advocates for the Defendants.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The Court opined that whether a mark is common to trade or not is a question of fact. Similarly, a mark may be a trademark in some jurisdictions and &#8216;publici juris&#8217; in others, but a mark that may be common to trade at one time may become distinctive over a period, or vice versa.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[58123,2543,58119,58120,2943,27643,8341,5881,58122,58121,31433,3221],"class_list":["post-293654","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bennet-coleman","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-e-now","tag-e-television","tag-injunction","tag-intellectual-property","tag-intellectual-property-rights","tag-ipr","tag-movies-now","tag-romedy-now","tag-times-group","tag-Trademark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>E-NOW Injunction: Delhi HC refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its logo| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi High Court refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its claim of &#039;prior use&#039; of logo.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi High Court refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its claim of &#039;prior use&#039; of logo.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-02T06:00:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-07T10:18:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"headline\":\"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-02T06:00:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-07T10:18:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":834,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"bennet coleman\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"E Now\",\"E television\",\"injunction\",\"Intellectual property\",\"intellectual property rights\",\"IPR\",\"movies now\",\"romedy now\",\"Times Group\",\"Trademark\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/\",\"name\":\"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi HC refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its logo| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-02T06:00:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-07T10:18:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi High Court refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its claim of 'prior use' of logo.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/06\\\/02\\\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor_9\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi HC refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its logo| SCC Blog","description":"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi High Court refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its claim of 'prior use' of logo.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d","og_description":"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi High Court refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its claim of 'prior use' of logo.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-02T06:00:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-07T10:18:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/"},"author":{"name":"Arunima","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"headline":"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d","datePublished":"2023-06-02T06:00:31+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-07T10:18:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/"},"wordCount":834,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","keywords":["bennet coleman","Delhi High Court","E Now","E television","injunction","Intellectual property","intellectual property rights","IPR","movies now","romedy now","Times Group","Trademark"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/","name":"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi HC refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its logo| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-06-02T06:00:31+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-07T10:18:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"E-NOW Injunction: Delhi High Court refuses injunction sought by Times Group for its claim of 'prior use' of logo.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-in-favour-of-times-group-for-its-logo-enow-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court denies injunction to Times Group for its claim of \u2018prior use\u2019 of logo \u201cNOW\u201d, \u201cE NOW\u201d \u201cE-NEWS NOW\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293654","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=293654"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293654\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=293654"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=293654"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=293654"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}