{"id":292953,"date":"2023-05-24T12:00:30","date_gmt":"2023-05-24T06:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=292953"},"modified":"2023-06-03T09:38:43","modified_gmt":"2023-06-03T04:08:43","slug":"nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/b> While upholding the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority rejecting appellant&#8217;s plea for dismissal of S. 7 application preferred by the respondent, the Division bench of <b>Ashok Bhushan*, J.<\/b> and Barun Mitra (Technical Member), held that S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) has no application when an action is initiated for default which occurred subsequent to S. 10-A period &#8211; <b>&#8220;25th March, 2020 to 25th March, 2021&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, respondent-Financial Creditor (Axis Trustee Services Ltd.) and appellant-Corporate Debtor (NuFuture Digital (India) Ltd.) entered into a debenture trust cum mortgage deed, thereby providing some time to the Corporate Debtor to make repayment of dues in 2020 to the Financial Creditor. The Financial Creditor further granted 3 months to the Corporate Debtor to make the repayment of the dues. In 2022, the Financial Creditor issued a Legal Notice regarding the same but was in vain.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent preferred an application under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a> against the Corporate Debtor to initiate the CIRP. The appellant challenged the S. 7 application on the ground that it was barred by S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a>, which provides for a moratorium on insolvency proceedings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 30-03-2023, rejected the appellant&#8217;s plea seeking the dismissal of S. 7 application and held that the S. 7 application is not barred by S. 10-A. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the appellant preferred the present appeal before the NCLAT challenging the same.<\/p>\n<p><b>Contentions<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant contended that the claim of the Financial Creditor is hit by S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a> because as per the Financial Creditor default have occurred in October, 2020, whereas the respondent contended that the present application is filed only with respect to the default committed on 31-03-2021 and thereafter which is not covered under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Law Point<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a> provides as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\"><i>&#8220;10-A. Notwithstanding anything contained in sections 7, 9 and 10, no application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process of a corporate debtor shall be filed, for any default arising on or after 25th March, 2020 for a period of six months or such further period, not exceeding one year from such date, as may be notified in this behalf:<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 54pt;\"><i>Provided that no application shall ever be filed for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process of a corporate debtor for the said default occurring during the said period.<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>Explanation.&#8212;For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the provisions of this section shall not apply to any default committed under the said sections before 25th March, 2020.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>Moot Point<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether an application filed under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a> by a Financial Creditor is barred by S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a>, which prohibits the initiation of CIRP for defaults that occurred during the period from 25-03- 2020 to 25-03-2021?<\/p>\n<p><b>Observation and Verdict<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The NCLAT relied on <i>Ramesh Kymal<\/i> v. <i>Siemens Games Renewable Power (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000782365\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2021) 3 SCC 224<\/a>, and observed that S. 10-A provided that no application shall ever be filed for the default which occurred during the period from <b>&#8220;25th March, 2020 to 25th March, 2021&#8221;<\/b> whereas the present petition is filed only with respect to the default committed after the S. 10-A period was over i.e. for the default on 31-03-2021 and thereafter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>&#8220;Section 10-A has no application when an action is initiated for default which occurred subsequent to 10-A period.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The NCLAT held that the application preferred by the Financial Creditor under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a> was not hit by S. 10-A as the defaulted amount included for the calculation in the S. 7 application did not pertain to the period covered by S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>&#8220;No defaulted amount included in the Section 7 application is for the period covered by Section 10-A, hence, there is no occasion to hold that Section 7 application is barred by Section 10-A.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While dismissing the instant appeal, NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order rejecting the appellant&#8217;s plea seeking the dismissal of S. 7 application and held that the S. 7 application is not barred by S. 10-A.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">NuFuture Digital (India) Ltd. v. Axis Trustee Services Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fzG9Nsqz\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 242<\/a>, order dated 09-05-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ashok Bhushan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Petrushka Dasgupta, Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Mr. Akshay Singh, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Ritika Sinha, Krishna Baruah, Counsel for the Appellant;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Suchitra Valjee, Mr. Kartik Nagarkatti, Ms. Neha Agarwa, Counsel for the Respondents.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>NCLAT held that benefit under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC<\/a> can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period &#8211; &#8216;05-03-2020 to 25-03-2021&#8217;.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":292824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43781,30596,30361,46429,30182,22014,12521,57854,22804],"class_list":["post-292953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cirp","tag-corporate-debtor","tag-ibc","tag-justice-ashok-bhushan","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-section-10-a","tag-section-7"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-24T06:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-03T04:08:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"Benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-24T06:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-03T04:08:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period","description":"NCLAT held that benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers","og_description":"NCLAT held that benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-24T06:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-03T04:08:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","name":"Benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-24T06:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-03T04:08:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that benefit under Section 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":376163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/nclat-section7-ibc-application-not-barred-under-section10a\/","url_meta":{"origin":292953,"position":0},"title":"Section 7 IBC application must confine to the defaults committed after Section 10A period: NCLAT","author":"Bharti","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\"When the Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) application is based on default committed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period and the amount claimed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period is well beyond threshold, application cannot be rejected on the ground.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 7 IBC application maintainable for post-Section 10A defaults","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/financial-creditor-application-section-7-ibc-nclt-cirp-corporate-debtor-consent-terms-breach-subsequent-application-allowed-appeal-nclat-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":292953,"position":1},"title":"Nature of Financial Debt does not change on account of breach of consent terms | NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While upholding the NCLT's order of admission of fresh application and initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal held that the nature of financial debt would not change on account of breach of the consent terms.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":291227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/04\/nclat-discusses-settlement-after-constitution-of-committee-of-creditors-under-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":292953,"position":2},"title":"What is the rule for settlement after constitution of &#8216;Committee of Creditors&#8217;? NCLAT Answers","author":"Ritu","date":"May 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny settlement after passing of the impugned order and after constitution of the CoC is only permissible when the same is approved with 90% vote share of CoC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/operational-creditor-cannot-claim-payment-equal-to-financial-creditor-in-insolvency-proceeding-under-ibc-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":292953,"position":3},"title":"Operational Creditor cannot claim payment equal to Financial Creditor in Insolvency proceeding under IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The principle of equality is applicable only in same class of creditors, i.e., secured or unsecured, financial or operational.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320870,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/26\/homebuyers-allottees-with-or-without-rera-orders-are-treated-equally-under-section-71-proviso-2-ibc-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":292953,"position":4},"title":"Homebuyers\/Allottees with or without RERA orders are treated equally under Section 7(1) proviso (2) IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"April 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the appellant, having obtained a recovery certificate from RERA, qualified as Financial Creditors.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":292953,"position":5},"title":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application","author":"Ritu","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLT\u2019s order did not contain specific findings regarding whether the entire loan amount had been paid and whether nothing remained due.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292953\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}