{"id":292549,"date":"2023-05-18T18:30:56","date_gmt":"2023-05-18T13:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=292549"},"modified":"2023-06-03T09:41:26","modified_gmt":"2023-06-03T04:11:26","slug":"nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT’s order"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/b> A division bench comprising of Ashok Bhushan, J. and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that for finding out threshold limit both amount Principal and Interest has to be computed.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellants preferred an application under S. 7<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) claiming a total debt of Rs. 1,33,68,915\/- including interest. The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 23-11-2022 rejected appellants’ S. 7 application on the grounds that it does not fulfil the threshold limit of Rs.1 Crore. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the appellants preferred an appeal before the NCLAT challenging the same.<\/p>\n

The appellants contended that the Adjudicating Authority only referred to principal amount and failed to consider amount of interest as contemplated in contemplated and held that S. 7 application does not fulfil the threshold.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT observed that the amount of Principal and Interest added is Rs. 1.33 Crore, which is beyond the minimum threshold, required. The NCLAT further observed that when the Deed of Guarantee mentions the interest on default, then for finding out threshold both amount Principal and Interest has to be computed.<\/p>\n

While not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the NCLAT set aside the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority and held that the Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the application under S. 7 for not fulfilling threshold under S. 4<\/a> IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

NCLAT remits the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to hear S. 7 application afresh.<\/p>\n

[Netafirm Agricultural Financing Agency (P) Ltd. v. Baliraja Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 241<\/a>, order dated 03-05-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Siddharth S. Chapalgaonkar, Mr. Adit Singh, Mr. Sameer Walimbe and Mr. Vishal Kamble, Counsel for the Appellants;<\/p>\n

Mr. Prakhar Tandon and Mr. Prashant Trivedi, Counsel for the Respondents.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting the S. 7 application for not fulfilling ‘threshold’ when Deed of Guarantee mentions about the interest on default.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":284626,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[30361,30182,22014,12521,57710,57711],"class_list":["post-292549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-ibc","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-section-7-application","tag-threshold-limit"],"yoast_head":"\nThreshold limit under IBC includes both principal amount and interest: NCLAT | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that to determine threshold limit under IBC both principal amount and interest to be computed.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT's order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that to determine threshold limit under IBC both principal amount and interest to be computed.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-18T13:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-03T04:11:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"Threshold limit under IBC includes both principal amount and interest: NCLAT | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-18T13:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-03T04:11:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that to determine threshold limit under IBC both principal amount and interest to be computed.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT’s order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Threshold limit under IBC includes both principal amount and interest: NCLAT | SCC Blog","description":"NCLAT held that to determine threshold limit under IBC both principal amount and interest to be computed.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT's order","og_description":"NCLAT held that to determine threshold limit under IBC both principal amount and interest to be computed.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-18T13:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-03T04:11:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","name":"Threshold limit under IBC includes both principal amount and interest: NCLAT | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png","datePublished":"2023-05-18T13:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-03T04:11:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that to determine threshold limit under IBC both principal amount and interest to be computed.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT’s order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":332849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/10\/an-one-time-settlement-agreement-cannot-extend-the-date-of-default-nclat-dismisses-samrat-restaurants-cirp-plea-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":292549,"position":0},"title":"\u2018A One Time Settlement agreement cannot extend the date of default\u2019; NCLAT dismisses Samrat Restaurant\u2019s CIRP plea","author":"Ritu","date":"October 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held the appellant\u2019s claim was inflated, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly recalculated the actual unpaid amount, which fell below the Rs 1 crore threshold.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320870,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/26\/homebuyers-allottees-with-or-without-rera-orders-are-treated-equally-under-section-71-proviso-2-ibc-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":292549,"position":1},"title":"Homebuyers\/Allottees with or without RERA orders are treated equally under Section 7(1) proviso (2) IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"April 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the appellant, having obtained a recovery certificate from RERA, qualified as Financial Creditors.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/nclat-section7-ibc-application-not-barred-under-section10a\/","url_meta":{"origin":292549,"position":2},"title":"Section 7 IBC application must confine to the defaults committed after Section 10A period: NCLAT","author":"Bharti","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\"When the Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) application is based on default committed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period and the amount claimed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period is well beyond threshold, application cannot be rejected on the ground.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 7 IBC application maintainable for post-Section 10A defaults","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279858,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/nclat-application-under-section-7-ibc-relating-to-the-interest-component-due-even-if-principal-amount-is-not-due-held-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":292549,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | Application under Section 7 IBC relating to the interest component due even if principal amount is not due, held maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Upholding the maintainability of an application filed under S. 7 IBC, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. (Judicial Member) and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) held that an application filed under S. 7 IBC could be maintained in respect of the component of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":306105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/01\/nclt-jurisdiction-imposition-fine-suspended-directors-non-cooperation-ibc-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":292549,"position":4},"title":"NCLT can\u2019t impose fine on suspended directors for non-cooperation under Sections 19(2) or 34(3) of IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Adjudicating Authority erred in passing the impugned order, directing the imposition fine, overlooking the law of the land through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/nclat-mumbai-interest-on-delayed-payments-is-a-part-of-operational-debt-under-s-311-of-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":292549,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT Mumbai |Interest on Delayed Payments is a part of Operational Debt under S. 3(11) of IBC","author":"Editor","date":"July 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: The Bench of Ashok Bhushan, J., Chairperson, M. Satyanarayana Murthy, Judicial Member, and Naresh Salecha, Technical member has dismissed a company appeal and has held that interest on delayed payment is also a form of debt and therefore, would form a part of the operational\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292549\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}