{"id":292431,"date":"2023-05-18T09:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-05-18T03:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=292431"},"modified":"2023-05-17T19:58:42","modified_gmt":"2023-05-17T14:28:42","slug":"2023-scc-vol-4-part-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","title":{"rendered":"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> &#8212; Or. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523666\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">9 R. 13<\/a> r\/w S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001527553\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">17<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002927404\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887<\/a> &#8212; Ex parte eviction decree:<\/span> Principles clarified relating to validity of rejection of application for setting aside of ex parte eviction decree on ground that amount towards further use and occupation of suit shop not deposited. [<i>Shyam Kumar Gupta<\/i> v. <i>Shubham Jain<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001479030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 713<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motor Vehicles Act, 1988<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(21)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(15)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(48)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569493\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10(2)(d)<\/a> [as amended by Amendment Act 54 of 1994] r\/w Rr. 5 and 31 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000083892\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989<\/a> and S. 149:<\/span> Matter relating to whether a person licensed to drive LMV ipso facto entitled to drive a transport vehicle in that category, referred by present three-Judge Bench to larger Bench of Supreme Court for reconsideration of correctness of ruling of three-Judge Bench in Mukund Dewangan, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002784946\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2017) 14 SCC 663<\/a>. Prayer for reconsideration of Mukund Dewangan case by a larger Bench, granted on ground that a number of important differences between licence for driving LMV and licence for driving transport vehicle of same weight, had not been considered therein. [<i>Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Rambha Devi<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001479031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 723<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825997\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001564458\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001564434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13(1)(d)<\/a> r\/w Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001564434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13(2)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001564442\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20<\/a> &#8212; Illegal gratification:<\/span> Law clarified on permissibility of drawing inferential deduction of guilt of public servant in absence of direct evidence of demand of illegal gratification. [<i>Neeraj Dutta<\/i> v. <i>State (NCT of Delhi)<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001479032\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 731<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 &#8212; Rr. 6(b)(i) and 6(b)(ii) &#8212; Valuation &#8212; Captive consumption of goods:<\/span> Principles clarified relating to approach to be adopted for determination of normal price and determination of applicability of R. 6(b)(i) or (ii) of the 1975 Rules. [<i>CCE<\/i> v. <i>J.R. Organics Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001479033\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 779<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> &#8212; Arts. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574847\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">124(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">217(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574964\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">222(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">216<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574872\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">141<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574865\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">136<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> &#8212; Collegium System of appointment of Judges &#8212; Transparency in:<\/span> Compliance with publication of final decision of Collegium on the Supreme Court&#8217;s website as per Resolution dt. 3-10-2017. Tentative and final decisions of Collegium, distinguished. Held, only final decisions have to be uploaded on Supreme Court&#8217;s website. [<i>Anjali Bhardwaj<\/i> v. <i>CPIO, Supreme Court of India<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001479034\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 784<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002782344\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Electricity Act, 2003<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553426\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">125<\/a> &#8212; Substantial question of law:<\/span> The existence of a &#8220;substantial question of law&#8221; arising from the judgment of APTEL is sine qua non for exercise of jurisdiction by Supreme Court under S. 125 of the 2003 Act. Test for determination of existence of substantial question of law, explained. Principles relating to scope of second appeal vis-&agrave;-vis issues that can be raised, elucidated. BSES [<i>Rajdhani Power Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001479035\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2023) 4 SCC 788<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Civil Procedure Code, 1908 &#8212; Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 &#8212; Ex <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":292460,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[8331,7601,14631,19791,14071,57667,5363],"class_list":["post-292431","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-electricity-act","tag-motor-vehicles-act","tag-prevention-of-corruption-act","tag-provincial-small-cause-courts-act","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 \u2014 Ex parte eviction decree\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 \u2014 Ex parte eviction decree\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-18T03:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\",\"name\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-18T03:30:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 \u2014 Ex parte eviction decree\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2023 scc vol. 4 part 5\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times","description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 \u2014 Ex parte eviction decree","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5","og_description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 \u2014 Ex parte eviction decree","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-18T03:30:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","name":"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-18T03:30:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 9 R. 13 r\/w S. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 \u2014 Ex parte eviction decree","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2023 scc vol. 4 part 5"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/2023-scc-vol-4-part-5\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2023 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/2023-scc-vol.-4-part-5.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/23\/eviction-decree-reasonable-requirement-valid-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":292431,"position":0},"title":"Eviction Decree based on reasonable requirement valid even without considering ground of building\/rebuilding: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA respondent without filing cross objection can canvass the correctness of finding against him in order to support the judgment that has been passed against the appellant.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/utt-hc-ex-parte-decree-set-aside-considering-sufficient-cause-under-or-9-r-13-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure-1908-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":292431,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte decree set aside considering \u201csufficient cause\u201d under Or. 9 R. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by Judge, Family Court whereby, the application filed by the appellant, under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/20\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":292431,"position":2},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 3","author":"Editor","date":"December 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 Rr. 3 and 4 \u2014 Abatement of appeal: Appeal as a whole cannot be dismissed as abated for not bringing on record legal representatives of co-sharers\/co-owners who died during pendency of appeal. [DDA v. Diwan Chand Anand, (2022) 10 SCC 428]\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-512.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":369065,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/07\/2025-scc-vol-9-part-5-latest-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":292431,"position":3},"title":"2025 SCC Vol. 9 Part 5","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"December 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"2025 SCC Vol. 9 Part 5: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Arbitration, Civil Procedure Code, Consumer Commissions, Election Law, NI Act, Service Law, and IBC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2025 SCC Vol. 9 Part 5","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/2025-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/2025-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/2025-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-5.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/2025-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-5.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/chhattisgarh-high-court-customary-divorce-separation-valid-divorce-when-custom-is-proved-hindu-marriage-act-code-of-civil-procedure-irretrievable-breakdown-aeof-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":292431,"position":4},"title":"Chhattisgarh High Court | Customary divorce reduced into writing followed by separation would be a valid divorce when custom is proved ancient","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Chhattisgarh High Court: In a case related to an appeal filed against the decision of the family Court, whereby an application filed by the husband seeking divorce was dismissed, Goutam Bhaduri, J. held that the marriage must be stand dissolved under S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":69482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/14\/an-ex-parte-divorce-decree-is-not-an-interlocutory-order-hence-appealable-under-s-19-of-family-courts-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":292431,"position":5},"title":"An ex parte divorce decree is not an interlocutory order, hence appealable under S. 19 of Family Courts Act","author":"Saba","date":"September 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: While deciding upon the challenge to the maintainability of the present matrimonial appeal as per Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the Division Bench of B.K. Nayak and K.R. Mohapatra, JJ., held that an ex parte divorce decree is not an interlocutory order, hence an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292431","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292431"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292431\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292460"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}