{"id":292406,"date":"2023-05-17T14:30:11","date_gmt":"2023-05-17T09:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=292406"},"modified":"2023-05-19T13:52:33","modified_gmt":"2023-05-19T08:22:33","slug":"delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Delhi High Court:<\/b> In a petition filed by Charanjit Singh Ahluwalia (petitioner), a senior citizen of 97 years age is challenging the constitutional validity of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568643\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">23(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002841661\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007<\/a> (&#8216;Senior Citizens Act&#8217;) whereby it restricts the applicability of the Section only to the gifts of property made by a senior citizen after the commencement of the Senior Citizens Act. A division bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ. and Subramonium Prasad, J., held that the present case is not fit for exercising its jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner is a senior citizen who was allotted property at Lajpat Nagar vide deed of conveyance and he claimed that two out of his four sons and four daughters fraudulently got gift deeds signed by the petitioner in their favour. The gifted property was a source of income for the petitioner and after the gift deed was executed, the rentals received were appropriated by his two children to whom the properties were gifted. However, the petitioner stated that he was manhandled and tortured by his two sons, the petitioner being 97 years of age, is also infirm and heartbroken and scared of his two sons to file any complaint with the Police. Thus, he seeks to revoke the gifts which were made in favour of his two sons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Section goes against the object and purpose of the Act to protect Senior Citizens as the senior citizens who have gifted their properties to their children or near and dear ones with the hope that they will be taken care of by them, are not being maintained by the persons to whom the property has been gifted, rather they are being tortured and abused. Thus, in such a scenario, the Act must be read in a manner to permit the senior citizens to revoke the gifts made by them prior to the commencement of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The issue under consideration is that the petitioner wants the words <b>&#8220;after the commencement of the Act&#8221;<\/b> to be taken away or struck down from Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568643\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">23<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002841661\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Senior Citizens Act<\/a> because Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568643\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">23<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002841661\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Senior Citizens Act<\/a> is read-only prospectively.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Placing reliance on <i>Human Rights and Social Welfare Forum<\/i> v. <i>Union of India<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5E73o8jS\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2021 SCC OnLine Ker 12268<\/a>, the Court noted that the Act did not intend to disturb the rights of the donee which has already been created and vested in him. The Legislature is conscious of the fact that the vested rights of the donor are not to be given a retrospective operation despite the fact that the object of the Act is to provide for measures for the welfare of senior citizens.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court dismissed the petition and held that the petitioner must approach the competent authority under the Senior Citizens Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Charanjit Singh Ahluwalia v Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d9NH740B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 2730<\/a>, decided on 12-05-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Advocates for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ravi Prakash, Mr. Farman Ali, Ms. Astu Khandelwal, Advocates for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Delhi High Court observed that the present case is not a case of casus omissus and the Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> cannot make the provision what the Legislature did not intend it to be.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":290500,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[57655,2543,2959,3590,48835,57654,31070],"class_list":["post-292406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-constitutional-valididity","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-Gift","tag-property","tag-prospective","tag-restrospective","tag-senior-citizen"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-17T09:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-19T08:22:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-17T09:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-19T08:22:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act","og_description":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-17T09:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-19T08:22:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/","name":"Delhi HC dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-17T09:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-19T08:22:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging prospective operation of Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-challenging-prospective-operation-of-section-23-senior-citizens-act-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a 97-year-old challenging prospective operation of S. 23 Senior Citizens Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/31\/property-disputes-not-covered-by-senior-citizens-act-dhc-purpose-of-act-to-ensure-welfare-senior-citizens-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":292406,"position":0},"title":"Property disputes not covered by Senior Citizens Act: Delhi HC emphasizes purpose of the Act is to ensure welfare of senior citizens","author":"Editor","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA reading of the Act makes it clear that the forum under the Act do not have the jurisdiction to decide the title of the property and the purpose of the Act is maintenance of the senior citizen and to ensure their welfare. The question of title, therefore, cannot be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316010,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/delhi-high-court-rules-eviction-son-daughter-in-law-directs-son-monthly-maintenance-senior-citizen-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":292406,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court rules eviction of son and daughter-in-Law; Directs son to pay Rs. 10,000 monthly maintenance under Senior Citizen Act","author":"Arunima","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 22(3)(1) of the Delhi Senior Citizens Rules outlines a procedure for eviction from a senior citizen's property and sub-rule (iv) allows the authority to conduct summary proceedings and order eviction of a son, daughter, or legal heir for non-maintenance and ill-treatment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/19\/delhi-hc-directs-government-to-decide-plea-for-conducting-door-to-door-survey-for-collection-of-senior-citizen-data-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":292406,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Government to decide plea for conducting door-to-door survey for collection of senior citizen data","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court directed the petition to be treated as a representation to the Chief Secretary, Government, State (NCT of Delhi).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/07\/family-property-dispute-cant-be-settled-under-senior-citizens-act-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":292406,"position":3},"title":"Settling family property disputes under Maintenance &amp; Welfare of Parents &amp; Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is against its object: Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, a transfer deed was executed between a senior citizen and his grandchildren, which stated that the transfer was subject to the condition that the transferee would provide the senior citizen with basic amenities.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Family property dispute under Senior Citizens Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Family-property-dispute-under-Senior-Citizens-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Family-property-dispute-under-Senior-Citizens-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Family-property-dispute-under-Senior-Citizens-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Family-property-dispute-under-Senior-Citizens-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/delhi-hc-district-magistrate-well-within-rights-under-delhi-senior-citizen-rules-pass-eviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":292406,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court | An eviction order is well within the power of District Magistrate under Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016","author":"Arunima","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 22 (2) & (3) of Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016 gives powers to the District Magistrate to pass an Order of eviction in case it is found that the senior citizens are being ill-treated and are not being maintained by their children.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333049,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/daughter-in-laws-right-to-shared-household-does-not-supersede-right-of-senior-citizen-under-senior-citizens-act-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":292406,"position":5},"title":"Daughter-in-law\u2019s right to shared household under DV Act does not supersede right of senior citizen to seek relief under Senior Citizens Act in case of gross ill-treatment: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"October 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Mere fact that the mother may be physically unwell, does not compel her to accept the presence of those who, in her perception, have contributed to her distress. The Court cannot impose on the senior citizen a forced living arrangement against her will, especially when it has been found to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292406\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}