{"id":292281,"date":"2023-05-16T15:00:39","date_gmt":"2023-05-16T09:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=292281"},"modified":"2023-05-23T11:42:04","modified_gmt":"2023-05-23T06:12:04","slug":"delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/b> In a petition filed under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> seeking appointment of an arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to a Memorandum of Understanding executed between the parties. Navin Chawla, J., held that the proceedings in the present petition cannot be continued in view of the moratorium imposed by the Supreme Court and further gave liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh legal action for the same relief once the moratorium imposed by the Supreme Court is lifted or varied if so advised, in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

The respondent company is a Special Purpose Vehicle to carry out the project of setting up of a recreation park at Gurgaon, Haryana based on Assisted Sector Agreement dated 01-04-2004 executed between the Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (‘HSIIDC’), on one hand, and Unitech Ltd and Sun Media Pvt. Ltd. on the other.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is a subsidiary of Unitech Limited which holds around 52% of the shares of the respondent. Unitech Holdings Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Unitech Limited. Thus, the moratorium is applicable to it too. Even on perusal of “Resolution Framework Unitech Groups” the respondent company is a part of the ‘Unitech Group’.<\/p>\n

The moratorium order by Supreme Court reads as follows:<\/p>\n

“We issue the following directions: xxx (vii) Pending further orders of this Court, there shall be a moratorium against the institution of proceedings against Unitech Limited and its subsidiaries. The moratorium shall also extend to existing proceedings against the company as well as the enforcement of orders that may have been passed against the company.”<\/i><\/p>\n

The Court noted that though the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the shareholdings of Unitech Holdings Limited in the respondent company was clandestinely increased without the prior permission of the HSIIDC, the fact remains that on the date of declaration of the moratorium, Unitech Holdings Limited held more than 52% shares in the respondent company and, therefore, the respondent company would be a subsidiary of Unitech Limited.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court concluded that the respondent company would be covered by the moratorium declared by the Supreme Court in its orders dated 20-01-2020 and 24-03-2021 passed in the civil appeal.<\/p>\n

The Court disposed of the petition and held that the proceedings in the petition cannot be continued subject to the liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh legal action for the same relief once the moratorium is lifted or varied.<\/p>\n

[Arpit Projects Limited v Gurgaon Recreation Park Limited, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2767<\/a>, decided on 11-05-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Chetan Anand, Mr. Akash Srivastav, Ms. Tejasvini Singh, Advocates for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n

Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Shivani Chawla, Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Mr. Rhythm Katyal, Mr. Ashutosh Chugh, Advocates for the Respondents.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh legal action for the same relief once the moratorium is lifted or varied.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":290500,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24904,3226,2543,57604,22074,57603],"class_list":["post-292281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment-of-arbitrator","tag-arbitration","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-gurgaon-recreation-park","tag-moratorium","tag-unitech-holdings"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC dismisses S. 11 A&C Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses Section 11 Arbitration Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses Section 11 Arbitration Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-16T09:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-23T06:12:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC dismisses S. 11 A&C Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-16T09:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-23T06:12:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court dismisses Section 11 Arbitration Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC dismisses S. 11 A&C Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court dismisses Section 11 Arbitration Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company","og_description":"Delhi High Court dismisses Section 11 Arbitration Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-16T09:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-23T06:12:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/","name":"Delhi HC dismisses S. 11 A&C Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-16T09:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-23T06:12:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court dismisses Section 11 Arbitration Act petition in view of moratorium imposed on parent company.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-application-under-section-11-arbitration-act-in-view-of-moratorium-imposed-on-parent-company-legal-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition under S. 11 Arbitration Act in view of moratorium imposed on parent company"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280427,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/27\/order-of-stay-moratorium-under-the-companies-act-2013-prohibits-the-initiation-of-any-proceedings-parties-cannot-be-referred-to-arbitration-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":292281,"position":0},"title":"Order of stay\/moratorium under the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits the initiation of any proceedings; Parties cannot be referred to Arbitration: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court ruled that the moratorium granted by the NCLAT, staying the institution of suits and proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, after the resolution process was initiated against it under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, was akin to an order of moratorium passed under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":285619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/27\/delhi-high-court-states-effect-of-res-judicata-on-section-11-of-arbitration-act-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":292281,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court clarifies the position of Res Judicata with respect to Section 11 of the Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court was of the view that it would be within its right to dismiss the petition at the threshold if the petition is not maintainable, otherwise an unacceptable position of law would arise where despite a petition being not maintainable due to lack of territorial jurisdiction would need\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/del-hc-sets-aside-arbitral-award-educomp-solutions-statutory-right-to-assail-decree-not-taken-away-s14-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":292281,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Statutory right created in favour of party to assail decree cannot be taken away by S.14 of IBC\u2019; Delhi Court sets aside Arbitral award in favour of Educomp Solutions Ltd.","author":"Editor","date":"September 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The autonomy conferred on the parties is not unbridled and appointment of the Arbitrator has to meet the prerequisite of his neutrality and impartiality which are the bedrock on which the foundation of arbitration rests.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis Hazari Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tis-Hazari-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tis-Hazari-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tis-Hazari-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Tis-Hazari-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/01\/the-intersection-between-arbitration-and-insolvency-proceedings-an-indian-perspective\/","url_meta":{"origin":292281,"position":3},"title":"The Intersection between Arbitration and Insolvency Proceedings: An Indian Perspective","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Indian Perspective","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-51.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":335098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/14\/supreme-court-refers-dispute-to-diac-sole-arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":292281,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Existence of arbitration agreement in license agreement and share subscription agreement not in dispute\u2019, Supreme Court refers matter to DIAC for appointment of sole arbitrator","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of either party including regarding the arbitrability of the dispute. All contentions and pleas are kept open for the parties to raise before the arbitral tribunal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appointment of Arbitrator","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/18\/dhc-appoints-justice-arvind-sangwan-as-sole-arbitrator-in-petition-filed-by-dixon-technologies\/","url_meta":{"origin":292281,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC appoints Justice Arvind Sangwan as sole arbitrator in a petition filed by Dixon Technologies","author":"Arushi","date":"February 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre and would abide by its rules and regulations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292281\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}