{"id":291676,"date":"2023-05-09T17:00:52","date_gmt":"2023-05-09T11:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=291676"},"modified":"2023-05-09T15:58:29","modified_gmt":"2023-05-09T10:28:29","slug":"madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/","title":{"rendered":"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court |<\/span> Subodh Abhyankar*<\/span>, J., held that S. 529A<\/a> of Companies Act, 1956<\/a> will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>, therefore for the purpose of payment of Income Tax liabilities, the secured creditors cannot be directed to part with the amount which has been given to them out of the proceeds of the properties of the company in liquidation.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, an application was filed by the Official Liquidator before this Court seeking to remit a sum of Rs. 2,26,940\/- to Income Tax Department towards Income Tax payable for the Assessment Year 2010-2011, out of funds available in the accounts of the Company in liquidation and to waive of the Income Tax liability of Rs. 16,81,220\/-, Rs. 21,58,480\/- & Rs. 15,63,570\/- in respect of Assessment Year 2012-2013, 2013-2014 & 2014-2015 respectively.<\/p>\n

While placing reliance on Ss. 529A<\/a> and 530<\/a> of the Companies Act, 1956<\/a>, the Official Liquidator contended that since the amount realized from the sale of the assets of the company has already been paid to the secured creditors and what is left to the company is liable to be set off against the secured creditors’ dues, therefore Official Liquidator's prayed be granted to remit amount for payment of tax. The Official Liquidator further contended that the Income Tax Department cannot claim its dues as a matter of right.<\/p>\n

Opposing the prayer, the counsel for Kotak Mahindra Bank, IFCI Bank and SASF contended that the Bank is a secured creditor, and their rights are also saved under S. 529A<\/a> of the Companies Act, 1956<\/a>. They further contended that S. 529A<\/a> of the Companies Act<\/a> would have the overriding effect if read along with S. 530 of the Companies Act as also S. 178 of the Income Tax Act. The Counsel for the Income Tax Department submitted that the income tax department has priority over other claims of the secured or unsecured creditors and referred to S. 178<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>.<\/p>\n

After examining Ss. 529A<\/a> and 530<\/a> of the Companies Act, 1956<\/a>, the Court observed that S. 529A shall have the overriding effect over any other law or any other provision of the Companies Act itself therefore dues of the workmen and that of the secured creditors shall have the overriding preferential treatment in respect of payments of their dues but all the other dues in respect of tax etc. shall only have the right of preferential payment<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Starit India Ltd., In re<\/i>, 1998 SCC OnLine Bom 685<\/a> where it was held that “Section 178 of the Income-tax Act was introduced in 1961, whereas Section 529A and the amendment to Section 530 of the Companies Act have been brought by an amendment in the year 1985. Section 529A has been given overriding effect over other dues including the dues under Section 530(1)(a) and also any other law for the time being in force.” <\/span>And observed that S. 529A<\/a> of the Companies Act, 1956<\/a> would have precedence over the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>. The Court further observed that the harmonious reading of the provisions of the two Acts concludes that S. 529A<\/a> of the Companies Act, 1956<\/a> would prevail over the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court while dismissing the present application, held that the secured creditors cannot be directed to part with the amount which has been given to them out of the proceeds of the properties of the company in liquidation for the purposes of payment of Income Tax liabilities.<\/p>\n

[In Ref: Beta Nephthol Ltd. v. Ref. has been recd. from BIFR New Delhi, 2023 SCC OnLine MP 748<\/a>, order dated 14-03-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Subodh Abhyankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Shri Nikhil Pandey, Counsel for SASF<\/p>\n

Shri Gaurav Chhabra, Counsel for Kotak Mahindra Bank<\/p>\n

Shri Raunak Choukse, Counsel for IFCI Bank <\/p>\n

Ms. Veena Mandlik, Counsel for Income Tax Department<\/p>\n

Shri H.Y. Mehta, Counsel for the Official Liquidator along with OL<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“…the Act of 1956 is a special Act which govern the law regarding companies only whereas IT Act is a general Act which percolates in just about every sphere of life and is applicable to all the citizen of India when it comes to payment of Income Tax.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":291010,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44137,54774,51086,29690,7201],"class_list":["post-291676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-companies-act-1956","tag-harmonious-construction","tag-income-tax-act-1961","tag-liquidation","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSection 529A of Companies Act, 1956 to prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: MP High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-09T11:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/\",\"name\":\"Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 to prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: MP High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-09T11:30:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 to prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: MP High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-09T11:30:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/","name":"Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 to prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: MP High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-09T11:30:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 will prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":286645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/assessment-officer-notice-initiation-re-assessment-proceedings-writ-petition-madhya-pradesh-high-court-alternative-remedy-available-admitted-examine-notice-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":291676,"position":0},"title":"Availability of Alternative Remedy is not an absolute Bar to challenge re-opening of assessment: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that alternative remedy is not absolute bar for examining conditions to issue reassessment notice and admitted the petitions for the final hearing.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":129611,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/08\/section-14a-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-is-applicable-dividend-income-on-which-tax-is-payable-under-section-115-o-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":291676,"position":1},"title":"Section 14A of Income Tax Act, 1961 is applicable to dividend income on which tax is payable under Section 115-O of the Act","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Answering the question as to whether the phrase \u201cincome which does not form part of total income under this Act\u201d appearing in Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 includes within its scope dividend income on shares in respect of which tax is payable under Section 115-O\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242653,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/23\/interplay-between-tax-laws-and-ib-code-during-liquidation\/","url_meta":{"origin":291676,"position":2},"title":"Interplay between tax laws and IB Code during liquidation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akaant Kumar Mittal\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 5","rel":"","context":"In "Akaant Mittal"","block_context":{"text":"Akaant Mittal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/individual\/akaant-mittal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/akant-mittal-blog.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/akant-mittal-blog.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/akant-mittal-blog.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/akant-mittal-blog.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/akant-mittal-blog.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309237,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/14\/revisional-court-has-jurisdiction-to-take-suo-motu-cognizance-of-intermediate-orders-madhya-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":291676,"position":3},"title":"Revisional Court has jurisdiction to take suo motu cognizance of intermediate orders under Sec 397 CrPC: Madhya Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"December 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 131 of the Income Tax Act allows the income tax authority to investigate and inquire about property, cash, or valuables obtained during an investigation by other law enforcement agencies, even if no income tax case was pending and the authority can conduct an inquiry to ensure that the appropriate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":32651,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/14\/company-judge-has-no-say-in-the-sale-of-secured-assets-made-by-secured-creditors-under-the-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":291676,"position":4},"title":"Company Judge has no say in the sale of secured assets made by secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While answering the common question of law involved in the present appeal that whether a Company Court directly or through an official liquidator can interfere in a sale of secured assets made by the secured creditors as per the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002, the Division Bench of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/25\/income-arising-to-the-uttar-pradesh-electricity-regulatory-commission-shall-not-be-included-in-the-total-income-for-the-purpose-of-income-tax-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":291676,"position":5},"title":"Income arising to the \u2018Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019 shall not be included in the total income for the purpose of Income Tax Act, 1961","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 10-03-2015, the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (46) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hereby notifies that the following income arising to the \u2018Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019, a Commission constituted under the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 shall not be included\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Notifications"","block_context":{"text":"Notifications","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/notifications\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291676\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}