{"id":291581,"date":"2023-05-08T17:30:45","date_gmt":"2023-05-08T12:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=291581"},"modified":"2023-05-19T15:50:24","modified_gmt":"2023-05-19T10:20:24","slug":"itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to charge assessee at gross profit rate of 6.5% on bogus purchases"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal:<\/b> In an appeal filed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), wherein the Commissioner of Income Tax (‘CIT’) confirmed the addition of Rs. 46,34,928\/- to the total income of the assessee being 12.5% of Rs. 3,70,79,423\/- i.e. unproved purchase , the two-member bench of Kuldip Singh<\/b>* (Judicial Member) and Gagan Goyal (Accountant Member) directed the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5% on bogus purchases of Rs. 3,70,79,423\/-.<\/p>\n

In the case at hand, the assessee is an individual running a business of trading in ferrous and non-ferrous metals. During the year, under assessment on the basis of information received from Sales Tax Department and Directorate General of Income Tax (‘DGIT’) that “some businessmen have indulged in acceptance of bogus purchase bills from bogus hawala bill providers and the assessee is one such beneficiaries of bogus purchase bills”, assessment was reopened by initiating the proceedings under Section 147<\/a>\/148<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (‘IT Act’).<\/p>\n

In response to the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, the assessee opted to treat the return already filed as response to the notice under Section 148 of the Act. The assessee has accepted entries in respect of bogus purchases from 7 entities. On failure of the assessee to produce entities before the AO for verification and after declining the explanation filed by the assessee the AO proceeded to make the addition of Rs.46,34,928\/- to the total income of the assessee being 12.5% of Rs.3,70,79,423\/- i.e. unproved purchases and thereby framed the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Act.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal said that the entire addition in this case has been made by the AO as well as CIT on the basis of guess work and estimation on the basis of some alleged information received from Sales Tax Department of Maharashtra and from DGIT that “the assessee has taken bogus purchase bills without having taken any delivery of the goods”, without applying their mind.<\/p>\n

Placing reliance on CIT<\/i> v. JK Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd.<\/i> ITA No. 1850 of 2017, and in view of the gross profit earned by the assessee in the earlier years based on which profit element was fixed at 6.5% of the alleged bogus purchases, the Tribunal directed the AO to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5% on bogus purchases of Rs.3,70,79,423\/-.<\/p>\n

[Babulal Hajarimalji Jain v Income Tax Officer, 2023 SCC OnLine ITAT 326<\/a>, Order dated 28-04-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Order by: Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Assessee by: Shashank Mehta;<\/p>\n

Revenue by: Chetan M. Kacha.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ITAT said that the entire addition has been made by the AO as well as CIT based on guess work and estimation based on some alleged information received from Sales Tax Department of Maharashtra and from DGIT that “the assessee has taken bogus purchase bills without having taken any delivery of the goods”, without applying their mind.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":284740,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31242,43114,5291,57454,57456,2592,30953,57455],"class_list":["post-291581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-assessee","tag-bogus-purchase","tag-cit","tag-dgit","tag-gross-profit-rate","tag-Income_Tax","tag-itat","tag-sales-tax-department"],"yoast_head":"\nITAT directs AO to charge gross profit rate of 6.5 percent on bogus purchases | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5 percent on bogus purchases.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to charge assessee at gross profit rate of 6.5% on bogus purchases\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5 percent on bogus purchases.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-08T12:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-19T10:20:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"ITAT directs AO to charge gross profit rate of 6.5 percent on bogus purchases | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-08T12:00:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-19T10:20:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5 percent on bogus purchases.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to charge assessee at gross profit rate of 6.5% on bogus purchases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ITAT directs AO to charge gross profit rate of 6.5 percent on bogus purchases | SCC Blog","description":"ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5 percent on bogus purchases.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to charge assessee at gross profit rate of 6.5% on bogus purchases","og_description":"ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5 percent on bogus purchases.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-08T12:00:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-19T10:20:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/","name":"ITAT directs AO to charge gross profit rate of 6.5 percent on bogus purchases | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png","datePublished":"2023-05-08T12:00:45+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-19T10:20:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to charge the assessee at the gross profit rate at 6.5 percent on bogus purchases.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/itat-directs-assessing-officer-to-charge-gross-profit-rate-of-6-5-percent-on-bogus-purchases-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to charge assessee at gross profit rate of 6.5% on bogus purchases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294050,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/07\/cit-right-in-deleting-addition-made-because-of-low-gp-rate-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":291581,"position":0},"title":"CIT was right in deleting addition made on account of low Gross Profit rate by AO without any justified reasoning: ITAT","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a well-accepted principal of tax jurisprudence that the Assessing Officer cannot sit on the armchair of a businessman assessee to replace his business strategy by his own whims and fancies","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/18\/itat-treating-entire-bogus-purchases-as-the-income-of-the-assessee-when-not-appropriate-itat-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":291581,"position":1},"title":"ITAT| Treating entire bogus purchases as the income of the Assessee when not appropriate? ITAT explains","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad: Dealing with the issue on accommodation entries and bogus purchases, the Tribunal has said that the entire purchase cannot be treated as a bogus purchase when there is evidence to establish that the payment was carried out through banking channels. The Assessee, in the present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216555,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/itat-assessee-must-be-given-adequate-opportunity-to-prove-the-receipt-of-share-capital-premium\/","url_meta":{"origin":291581,"position":2},"title":"ITAT| Assessee must be given adequate opportunity to prove the receipt of share capital\/premium","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (ITAT):\u00a0 In a case related to bogus Share Capital\/Premium, the Accountant Member RK Panda took note of the fact that the Supreme Court verdict in PCIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd., 2019 SCC Online SC 311 was pronounced subsequently wherein it was held,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/will-hostel-facility-which-is-incidental-to-providing-education-as-per-object-of-assessee-be-a-charitable-purpose-exempted\/","url_meta":{"origin":291581,"position":3},"title":"Will hostel facility which is incidental to providing education as per object of assessee be a charitable purpose exempted under S. 11 of Income Tax Act? ITAT answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): Coram of Anil Chaturvedi (Accountant Member) and Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member) allowed the appeal filed by the assessee challenging the assessment order made by the Income Tax authorities. The assessee society was duly registered, and the renewal was granted for the period of 5 years.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/11\/revenue-can-bring-expenditure-incurred-earlier-years-taxed-subsequent-years-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":291581,"position":4},"title":"Can revenue bring expenditure incurred in earlier years to be taxed in subsequent years? ITAT answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After examining the expenses payable and the detailed order of the CIT,the ITAT held that the CIT has correctly examined the invoices, period and purpose for the expenses which have not been paid for the last six years","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"income tax appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/bogus-parties-and-dubious-transactions-read-itats-observations-on-a-matter-concerning-non-existent-lenders\/","url_meta":{"origin":291581,"position":5},"title":"Bogus Parties and Dubious Transactions- Read ITAT’s observations on a matter concerning “non-existent lenders”","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi: While deciding the instant appeal pertaining to the Assessment Year 2015-16 where the Revenue challenged the decision of CIT(A) for deleting the addition of Rs 4,33,18,870 made on account of unsecured loan under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291581\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}