{"id":291120,"date":"2023-05-02T15:05:34","date_gmt":"2023-05-02T09:35:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=291120"},"modified":"2023-05-02T15:39:26","modified_gmt":"2023-05-02T10:09:26","slug":"supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 14pt;\">Judgment Delivered<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><i>N.N. Mercantile Private Limited<\/i> v. <i>Indo Unique Flame Limited<\/i>, Civil Appeal 3802-3803 of 2020<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Judgment Delivered on: 25-04-2023<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Coram:<\/span> K.M. Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and C.T. Ravikumar<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abridgement:<\/span> It was an appeal against a full bench judgment challenging the non-admissibility of an unstamped arbitration agreement. The Bench in a 3:2 majority held that unstamped arbitration agreements are not valid in law. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements-are-not-valid-in-law-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">READ MORE&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 14pt;\">Judgment Reserved<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><i>Cox and Kings Limited<\/i> v. <i>SAP India Private Limited<\/i>, Arbitration Petition 38 of 2020<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Judgment Reserved on: 12-04-2023.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Coram:<\/span> Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, C.J., Hrishikesh Roy, Pamidighantam S. Narasimha, J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra J.J.,<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abridgement:<\/span> The Constitution Bench reserved the matter of <i>Cox and Kings Limited<\/i> v. <i>SAP India Private Limited<\/i>, pertaining to the issue of:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Whether the Group of Companies Doctrine exists in Indian jurisprudence, independent of statutory provision?<\/li>\n<li>Whether the same can be read into Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544989\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (\u2018Arbitration Act\u2019)?<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether it should continue to be invoked on grounds of a single economic reality principle? 4. Whether it should be construed as a means of interpreting the implied intent or consent to arbitrate between the parties? <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/23\/supreme-court-considers-existence-of-doctrine-of-group-of-companies-in-indian-jurisprudence-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">READ MORE\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 14pt;\">Matters Heard<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><i>Karmanya Singh Sareen<\/i> v. <i>Union of India<\/i> SLP (C) 804 of 2017<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Last Date of Hearing- 11-04-2023<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Next Date of Hearing- August 2023<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Coram:<\/span> K.M. Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy, C.T. Ravikumar J.J.,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abridgment<\/span>&#8211; The Bench considered the submission made by the Attorney General for India, R. Venkataramani appearing on behalf of the Center, that the new Data Protection Bill was ready to be introduced in the Monsoon Session of the Parliament to be held in July 2023 which would address all the concerns raised by the petitioners, during the course of hearing of the matter pertaining to the latest privacy policy of WhatsApp. The Bench deferred the hearing till August 2023. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/12\/whatsapp-v-right-to-privacy-attorney-general-informs-sc-that-the-new-data-protection-bill-was-ready-to-be-tabled-in-monsoon-parliament-session-supreme-court-defers-hearing-legal-news-legal-research-up\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">READ MORE\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><i>Supriyo<\/i> v. <i>Union of India<\/i>, Writ Petition (Civil) 1011 of 2022<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Coram:<\/span> Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, C.J., Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S. Ravindra Bhatt, Hima Kohli and Pamidighantam S. Narasimha J.J.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abridgement<\/span>: This is a batch of petitions seeking legal recognition of same sex marriage under several Acts, including the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002835344\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Special Marriage Act, 1954<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942235\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Foreign Marriage Act, 1969<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> and the same be made gender neutral. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/18\/same-sex-marriage-the-petitioner-refers-to-navtej-singh-johar-matter-and-challenged-the-constitutional-validity-of-provision-of-special-marriage-act-foreign-marriage-act-and-hindu-marriage-act-supreme\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">READ MORE\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Don&#8217;t miss out on the 5-Judge Bench verdict pertaining to non-admissibility of an unstamped arbitration agreement and Constitution Bench hearing pertaining to the petitions seeking legal recognition of same sex marriage under several Acts, including the SMA, 1954, the FMA, 1969 and HMA, 1955.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":291130,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,34119],"tags":[15921,55778,46633,43657,35482,5363,46945,56447,54951],"class_list":["post-291120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-scmonthly","tag-constitution-bench","tag-doctrine-of-group-of-companies","tag-monthly-roundups","tag-roundup","tag-same-sex-marriage","tag-supreme-court","tag-supreme-court-monthly-roundup","tag-supreme-court-roundup","tag-whatsapp-privacy-policy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup April 2023 | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup for April 2023 with matters like, same-sex marriage, Doctrine of Group of Companies and more.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup for April 2023 with matters like, same-sex marriage, Doctrine of Group of Companies and more.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-02T09:35:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-02T10:09:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup April 2023 | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-02T09:35:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-02T10:09:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup for April 2023 with matters like, same-sex marriage, Doctrine of Group of Companies and more.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"supreme court constitution bench april 2023\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup April 2023 | SCC Blog","description":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup for April 2023 with matters like, same-sex marriage, Doctrine of Group of Companies and more.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement","og_description":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup for April 2023 with matters like, same-sex marriage, Doctrine of Group of Companies and more.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-02T09:35:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-02T10:09:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/","name":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup April 2023 | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-02T09:35:34+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-02T10:09:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Supreme Court Constitution Bench Roundup for April 2023 with matters like, same-sex marriage, Doctrine of Group of Companies and more.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"supreme court constitution bench april 2023"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-roundup-group-of-companies-doctrine-in-indian-jurisprudence-matter-reserved-and-momentous-same-sex-marriage-matter-dominates-the-month-of-april-2023-legal-news-legal-r\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Constitution\/5-Judge Bench Roundup | The momentous same-sex marriage hearing dominates the month of April 2023; Big ruling on unstamped arbitration agreement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-april-2023-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":304327,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/supreme-court-7-judge-bench-to-reconsider-whether-unstamped-arbitration-agreements-valid\/","url_meta":{"origin":291120,"position":0},"title":"7-Judge Bench of Supreme Court all set to reconsider whether unstamped arbitration agreements are valid in law","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Having regard to larger ramifications of NN Global case, the Supreme Court viewed that proceedings should be placed before a seven-judge bench to reconsider the correctness of the view by a five-judge bench.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unstamped arbitration agreements","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/06\/supreme-court-to-decide-validity-of-unstamped-arbitration-agreement-legal-research-legal-news-updates-stamp-act-arbitration-conciliation-act-constitution-bench-judgment-reserved\/","url_meta":{"origin":291120,"position":1},"title":"EXPLAINED| Stamp Act versus Arbitration Act issue on validity of an Unstamped Arbitration Agreement as Supreme Court reserves Judgment","author":"Editor","date":"February 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Constitution bench considered a question of law : whether the instrument was duly stamped or not, was not only contrary to the plain language of Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration Act, but also wholly defeated the legislative intention of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, and puts a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-301.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":290534,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements-are-not-valid-in-law-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":291120,"position":2},"title":"[Majority View] Unstamped Arbitration Agreements are not valid in law: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Five-Judge Bench of Supreme Court in 3:2 majority approved paragraphs 22 and 29 of Garware Wall Ropes case, and to this extent, also approved Vidya Drolia case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-36.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-36.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-36.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-36.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/supreme-court-2021-12-months-12-stories\/","url_meta":{"origin":291120,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court 2021: 12 Months, 12 Stories","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"JANUARY Manish Kumar v. Union of India, (2021) 5 SCC 1 The 3-Judge Bench of Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha and K.M. Joseph, JJ., in a 465-pages long judgment, upheld the validity of several provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020, albeit with directions given in exercise\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242183,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/does-non-payment-of-stamp-duty-in-a-commercial-contract-invalidate-the-arbitration-clause-issue-referred-to-the-constitutional-bench-to-decide\/","url_meta":{"origin":291120,"position":4},"title":"Does non-payment of stamp duty in a commercial contract invalidate the arbitration clause? Issue referred to the Constitutional bench to decide","author":"Nilufer Bhateja","date":"January 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The three-judge bench comprising DY Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee and Indu Malhotra, JJ. has observed that non-payment of stamp duty in a commercial contract does not invalidate the arbitration clause mentioned in the contract. The bench decided to refer the matter to a constitutional bench after it realized that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252125,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/02\/unstamped-arbitration-agreements\/","url_meta":{"origin":291120,"position":5},"title":"Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Awaiting the Light at the End of the Tunnel","author":"Editor","date":"August 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Sidhant Kumar\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291120\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}