{"id":291058,"date":"2023-05-02T09:00:48","date_gmt":"2023-05-02T03:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=291058"},"modified":"2023-05-10T17:17:39","modified_gmt":"2023-05-10T11:47:39","slug":"condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Andhra Pradesh High Court:<\/b> The petitioner challenged the order passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni wherein an application for condonation of delay was not allowed in the year 2022, in the suit that was dismissed for non-prosecution in 2017. While exercising its civil revision jurisdiction, the single Judge Bench of Ravi Cheemalapati J. condoned a delay of 339 days for the suit filed in 2012 for a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the use of passage in any manner by taking the bullock cart.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the matter at hand, the petitioner had filed for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant and their men from obstructing or inferring in any manner from using the <i>Rastha by<\/i> taking the bullock cart, which existed from time immemorial, running from East to West from the part of land of the defendant to reach the part of land of the plaintiff. However, when the trial of the suit commenced, it was dismissed vide order dated 24-07-2017 for non-prosecution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, an application under Section 5 of the limitation Act was filed to condone the delay of 339 days in filing the petition for restoration of the suit, on the ground that the petitioner was not keeping good health.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that no doubt the petitioner had not explained the reasons for the delay in his application, but the Court below should have considered the same by imposing costs. It further stated that ordinarily the litigation should not be terminated by default either of the plaintiff or the defendant. The cause of justice does require that the adjudication be done on merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench observed that though the suit was of the year 2012, the same was pending even till date and if the said application was not considered, the rights of the petitioner would end up being affected. Keeping in view of the same, the Court was inclined to consider the revision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With the above observation, the Court set aside the order passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni on a condition of payment of costs at INR 1500\/- to the respondents. It also clarified that if the costs were not paid, the impugned order would hold good.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Pinjari Khasim v Chanda Saheb, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/LO6024TS\">2023 SCC OnLine AP 698<\/a>, decided on 28-03-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the petitioner- Advocate Y. Koteshwar Rao;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the respondent- Advocate B. Sarvotham Reddy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Ordinarily the litigation should not be terminated by default either of the plaintiff or the defendant. The cause of justice does require that the adjudication be done on merits.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":290507,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2553,57282,24144,57281],"class_list":["post-291058","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Andhra_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-delay-condoned","tag-limitation-act","tag-permanet-injunction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[Condonation of delay] Litigation should not be terminated by default: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh High Court recently allowed condonation of delay of 339 days restricting termination of litigation by default of either of the parties.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh High Court recently allowed condonation of delay of 339 days restricting termination of litigation by default of either of the parties.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-02T03:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-10T11:47:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"[Condonation of delay] Litigation should not be terminated by default: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-02T03:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-10T11:47:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Andhra Pradesh High Court recently allowed condonation of delay of 339 days restricting termination of litigation by default of either of the parties.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"andhra pradesh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Condonation of delay] Litigation should not be terminated by default: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog","description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court recently allowed condonation of delay of 339 days restricting termination of litigation by default of either of the parties.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days","og_description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court recently allowed condonation of delay of 339 days restricting termination of litigation by default of either of the parties.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-05-02T03:30:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-10T11:47:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/","name":"[Condonation of delay] Litigation should not be terminated by default: Andhra Pradesh HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-05-02T03:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-10T11:47:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court recently allowed condonation of delay of 339 days restricting termination of litigation by default of either of the parties.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"andhra pradesh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/condonation-of-delay-litigation-should-not-be-terminated-by-default-andhra-pradesh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Litigation should not be terminated by default of either of the parties; Andhra Pradesh High Court condones a delay of 339 days"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/30\/delay-of-1011-days-condoned-by-andhra-pradesh-hc-what-a-grave-error-holds-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":291058,"position":0},"title":"Delay of 1011 days condoned by Andhra Pradesh HC! What a grave error, holds Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Andhra Pradesh High Court had condoned a delay of 1011 days even though no sufficient cause was shown explaining the delay, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the High Court has not exercised the discretion judiciously. Factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291485,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/07\/weekly-legal-roundup-high-courts-in-may-2023-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":291058,"position":1},"title":"HIGH COURT MAY 2023 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on JEE Main 2023 eligibility; Manipur Violence; Chanda Kochhar retirement; Rehabilitation and Redevelopment of Slums and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"high courts weekly roundup may","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/high-courts-weekly-roundup-may.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/high-courts-weekly-roundup-may.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/high-courts-weekly-roundup-may.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/high-courts-weekly-roundup-may.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/19\/andhra-pradesh-hc-divorce-petition-u-s27-the-special-marriage-act-can-be-heard-by-additional-district-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":291058,"position":2},"title":"Divorce petition u\/s 27 of the Special Marriage Act can be heard by Additional District Judge: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 11(2) of Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972 empowers the District Judge to transfer any case to the Additional District Judge who would have the same power as that of the District Judge in disposing of the transfer cases.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-explains-scope-of-the-residuary-provision-provided-under-article-113-of-the-limitation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":291058,"position":3},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court explains scope of the residuary provision provided under Article 113 of the Limitation Act","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"When a case falls under any specific provision of law, their residuary clauses cannot be resorted to and the parties cannot seek shelter under the residuary provision under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-491.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":240687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/ap-hc-real-respect-and-honour-is-to-render-speedy-justice-to-senior-citizens-hc-says-early-disposal-of-cases-concerning-senior-citizens-should-be-prioritised\/","url_meta":{"origin":291058,"position":4},"title":"AP HC | &#8220;Real respect and honour is to render speedy justice to senior citizens&#8221;: HC says early disposal of cases concerning senior citizens should be prioritised","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: Battu Devanand, J., observed that: It is the duty of the Courts to see that the senior citizens shall be given priority for early disposal of their cases whether those are civil or criminal or service or any type of litigation to enable them to enjoy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/chh-hc-the-word-sufficient-cause-under-s-5-of-limitation-act-should-adopt-a-liberal-and-justice-oriented-construction-to-advance-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":291058,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | The word &#8220;sufficient cause&#8221; under S. 5 of Limitation Act should adopt a liberal and justice-oriented construction to advance justice","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J., allowed the appeal and condoned the delay while setting aside the impugned order. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction in respect of the land. The Trial Court dismissed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291058","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291058"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291058\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291058"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291058"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291058"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}