{"id":290889,"date":"2023-04-29T09:00:35","date_gmt":"2023-04-29T03:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=290889"},"modified":"2023-05-05T09:21:44","modified_gmt":"2023-05-05T03:51:44","slug":"violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/","title":{"rendered":"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/b> In an application filed under Section 482<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> Vinod Bihari Lal, Director of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (‘SHUATS’) seeking to quash the proceedings for offences under Section 2<\/a> read with 3<\/a> of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986<\/a> (‘Act, 1986’) JJ. Munir, J. held that violence in one form or the other is not sine qua non for a group of persons to qualify as a gang under Section 2(b)<\/a> of the Act of 1986<\/a>. Thus, the Court dismissed the application.<\/p>\n

In the case at hand, the police came to know that Vinod Bihari Lal is a leader of an organised gang. This gang is proficient in the commission of economic crimes through fraud and deceit, being offences of the kind, described in Chapters XVI, XVII and XXII of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and by perpetration of such offences, the members of the gang gain personal, material and pecuniary benefit for themselves. They do so by tampering with and forging documents. By commission of such offences, they accumulate wealth and because of their fear and terror amongst members of the public, no one comes forward to lodge a report against them or muster courage to testify in Court. The gang chart has been approved by the District Magistrate.<\/p>\n

Vinod Bihari Lal submitted that none of the offences charged against him, neither involve violence nor disturbance of public order. Further, there is a violation of Rules 5(2), 5(3), 16 and 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 vitiating the gang-chart.<\/p>\n

The Court refer to the provisions of Section 2(b)<\/a> of the Act of 1986<\/a> and observed that violence or disturbance of public order alone are not the sine qua non of a gang. It postulates a group of persons, who either acting singly or collectively, employ violence, or threat or show of violence, or intimidation, or coercion, ‘or otherwise’ with the object of :<\/p>\n

(i) disturbing public order; or<\/p>\n

(ii) gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary, material; or other advantage for himself or any other person, indulge in anti-social activities, enumerated in clauses (i) to (xxii) of subsection (b) of Section 2<\/a> of the Act of 1986<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court reiterated that a statute should be read and understood according to its plain grammatical meaning, unless that construction leads to an absurd result, or defeats the object and the very purpose of it.<\/p>\n

The Court said that Section 2(b)<\/a> of the Act of 1986<\/a> would indicate that with object of disturbing public order or gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary, material or other advantage for himself or any other person, a group of persons acting singly or collectively may act by violence or threat or show of violence, or intimidation, or coercion or otherwise. Thus, the employment of the words ‘otherwise’ after the word ‘coercion’ indicates that the twin object of disturbing public order or gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary advantage etc. is the hallmark of a group acting through a member, singly or collectively, to qualify as a gang. The employment of the word ‘otherwise’ after ‘coercion’ is not to be read ejusdem generis<\/i> with the preceding word like coercion, intimidation etc. Rather, the employment of the word ‘otherwise’ shows that the group may act in any manner to achieve the object of disturbing public order or gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary advantage etc. Thus, the Court held that violence in one form or the other is not sine qua non for a group of persons to qualify as a gang under Section 2(b)<\/a> of the Act of 1986<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Further, it was observed that at the stage of approving the gang-chart based on materials placed, the competent Authority should satisfy itself that a case for prosecution under the Act of 1986<\/a> is made out. Collection of further materials to prosecute follows at a later stage when after registration of the case, investigation commences. Therefore, any fallacy in the mode of approval of the gang-chart would not be of much relevance, where the case is already up for trial after conclusion of investigation. This is not to say that the gang-chart betrays any violation of the Rules. Thus, the Court did not find any good ground to quash the impugned proceedings.<\/p>\n

[Vinod Bihari Lal v State of UP, 2023 SCC OnLine All 143<\/a>, Order dated 19-04-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court reiterated that a statute should be read and understood according to its plain grammatical meaning, unless that construction leads to an absurd result, or defeats the object and the very purpose of it<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":290504,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2510,35128,34269,57218,4651],"class_list":["post-290889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-coercion","tag-ejusdem-generis","tag-gang-chart","tag-violence"],"yoast_head":"\nAllahabad HC on UP Gangsters Act: Violence not a condition to qualify as a gang | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court held that violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court held that violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-29T03:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-05T03:51:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad HC on UP Gangsters Act: Violence not a condition to qualify as a gang | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-29T03:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-05T03:51:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court held that violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"allahabad high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad HC on UP Gangsters Act: Violence not a condition to qualify as a gang | SCC Blog","description":"Allahabad High Court held that violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court","og_description":"Allahabad High Court held that violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-04-29T03:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-05T03:51:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/","name":"Allahabad HC on UP Gangsters Act: Violence not a condition to qualify as a gang | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-04-29T03:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-05T03:51:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabad High Court held that violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"allahabad high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/violence-in-one-form-or-other-is-not-sine-qua-non-for-a-group-to-qualify-as-a-gang-under-up-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-allahabad-high-court-legal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Violence in one form or other is not sine qua non for a group to qualify as a gang under UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act: Allahabad High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/19\/gang\/","url_meta":{"origin":290889,"position":0},"title":"All HC | What are the conditions to constitute a “Gang”? Are the two parts of definition mutually exclusive? Read HC’s opinion","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Anjani Kumar Mishra and Shekhar Kumar Yadav, JJ., expressed on what constitutes as \u2018Gang\u2019 under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Petitioner sought to quash an FIR that gave rise to a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/19\/allahabad-high-court-u-p-gangsters-and-anti-social-activities-prevention-act-srikant-tyagi-bail-indian-penal-code-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":290889,"position":1},"title":"Allahabad High Court grants bail to Politician Srikant Tyagi for offences under U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986","author":"Editor","date":"October 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad high Court: In a bail application filed by Srikant Tyagi for offences under Sections 2 and 3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, (\u2018UP Gangster Act\u2019) during the pendency of trial, Surendra Singh-I, J. has allowed the bail application plea of Srikant Tyagi considering the facts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266062,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/28\/single-crime-gang-gangsters-act-supreme-court-judgment-legal-updates-reserach-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":290889,"position":2},"title":"Even a single crime committed by a \u2018Gang\u2019 is sufficient to prosecute an accused under the Gangsters Act: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where it was argued before the Court that an accused cannot be prosecuted under the Gangsters Act, 1986 for a single offence\/FIR\/charge sheet with respect to any of the antisocial activities mentioned in Section 2(b), the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-148-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-148-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-148-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-148-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-148-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374596,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/04\/all-hc-refuses-to-quash-up-gangsters-act-case-against-former-mla-irfan-solanki\/","url_meta":{"origin":290889,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad High Court refuses to quash UP Gangsters Act case against Former MLA Irfan Solanki","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"February 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"An FIR was filed under the Gangsters Act against 5 persons, namely Irfan Solanki and four others, alleging that they were in a gang and committing crimes.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Former MLA Irfan Solanki","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Former-MLA-Irfan-Solanki.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Former-MLA-Irfan-Solanki.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Former-MLA-Irfan-Solanki.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Former-MLA-Irfan-Solanki.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/16\/alleged-misuse-of-police-powers-under-gangsters-act-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":290889,"position":4},"title":"Alleged Misuse of Police Powers under Gangsters Act: Allahabad HC slams UP Home, Police Department for non-compliance with Court orders, flags “lackadaisical approach”","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"January 16, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSuch an approach seemingly proceeds on the erroneous assumption that the power to issue notifications, being vested in the executive branches, may be exercised without due application of mind, by resorting to unfettered discretion and without examining the consequential effects thereof.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Misuse of Police Powers under Gangsters Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Misuse-of-Police-Powers-under-Gangsters-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Misuse-of-Police-Powers-under-Gangsters-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Misuse-of-Police-Powers-under-Gangsters-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Misuse-of-Police-Powers-under-Gangsters-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316804,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/12\/prosecution-not-under-obligation-to-mention-all-offences-for-which-accused-being-prosecuted-at-the-time-of-registration-of-fir-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":290889,"position":5},"title":"Is it necessary to mention in FIR any one or more offences described under S. 2(b) of UP Gangsters Act? Allahabad HC refers issue to Larger Bench","author":"Editor","date":"March 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCourt must strive to so interpret the statute as to promote and advance the object and purpose of the enactment. For this purpose, where necessary the Court may even depart from the rule that plain words should be interpreted according to their plain meaning and there need no meek and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=290889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290889\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=290889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=290889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=290889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}