{"id":290723,"date":"2023-04-27T16:00:03","date_gmt":"2023-04-27T10:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=290723"},"modified":"2023-04-27T15:14:51","modified_gmt":"2023-04-27T09:44:51","slug":"third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner’s consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Superior Court of Justice, Ontario:<\/b> A motion for summary judgment was brought by the plaintiff against the third party (defendant’s insurer), seeking a declaration that full third-party limits were available to the defendant at the time of the incident. A Single Judge Bench of D.L. Edwards, J., granted the plaintiff’s summary judgment motion and held that third-party insurance coverage was available to the defendant at the time of the incident.<\/p>\n

Brief Facts:<\/b><\/p>\n

In the matter at hand, an incident occurred in Dunnville, Ontario wherein, a four-wheeled all-terrain vehicle was driven by the defendant and plaintiff was the passenger. The defendant took his father’s all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) after obtaining his consent to help his friend whose ATV was stuck in the mud on a field. On his way back home, the defendant went off the trails and travelled along the shoulder of a road due to a snow squall. While driving along the shoulder road, the defendant drove the ATV into a culvert between the shoulder of the road and a farmer’s field. The ATV rolled over and both plaintiff and defendant were injured. The defendant possessed a G1 driver’s license which required a licensed driver to be seated next to the driver when driving a motor vehicle on Ontario highways. He was convicted of two offences under the Highway Traffic Act, 1990 – driving an ATV on a highway and for operating a vehicle on a highway without a proper license.<\/p>\n

Defendant’s father was the registered owner of both the ATVs, he was insured with the third party under standard Ontario automobile policy, which included third party liability coverage of $1 million. Defendant was also an insured on the policy when he operated the insured vehicle with his father’s consent.<\/p>\n

Issues:<\/b><\/p>\n

Whether defendant’s father knew or ought to have known that defendant would breach statutory condition 4(1), when he consented to the defendant to drive his ATV?<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court said that the nature of the consent given to defendant by his father is an important fact which must be determined. It was found that defendant’s father had given specific consent to drive on one highway i.e., ‘Central Lane’, for the sole purpose of going from their residence to the open field and back home, he was not otherwise permitted to drive on highways, except for the purpose of crossing the road to access the next trail. Thus, defendant’s father ought to have known that a person driving alone on an ATV on central lane and holding a G1 driver’s license, was breach of Statutory Condition 4(1). Further, the Court said that “it is reasonable and prudent for an owner and operator of an ATV to inform himself of the laws and regulations related to its use”.<\/p>\n

Does breach of statutory condition 4(1) constitute breach void insurance coverage for the entire trip?<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court relied on the test of reasonable foreseeability for assessing whether a vehicle breached the statutory conditions of the insurance policy. The Court placed its reliance on the factor that both the father and defendant were mistaken in believing that central lane was not a highway, although they were in error, but it is relevant. It is to be considered that the father of the defendant in his mind did not permit the defendant to drive on a highway. Thus, the Court found that father of the defendant did not permit him to drive on any highway other than central lane.<\/p>\n

To answer that whether breach of statutory condition 4(1) by defendant’s father to permit him to drive on central lane mean that coverage for the entire trip was obviated, the Court placed its reliance on Beacomon<\/i> v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co.<\/i>, 2007 Carwell Ont. 9747 and said that “it is satisfied that, had the incident occurred on a trail in a field, the third party would have been obligated to defend the defendant and had potential liability”. Further, it was found that although defendant’s father did breach statutory condition 4(1), he only did so with respect to permitting the defendant to drive the ATV on central lane. That does not taint the entire trip. Defendant did not breach statutory condition 4(1) with respect to the balance of the trip or at the time of the incident. Further, it was found that consent to the defendant by his father was a minor breach, given the nature of the central lane, which is not a busy highway.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court granted the motion for a summary judgment and declared that full third-party policy limits were available to the defendant at the time of the incident.<\/p>\n

[Breanne Pridmore v. Tyler Drenth, 2023 ONSC 817, decided on 01-02-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the plaintiff: Advocate Daniel strigberger and Advocate Leah Burlock;<\/p>\n

For the third party: Advocate Matthew Wells and Advocate Manvir Manku.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court said that ignorance of the fact that G1 license holders had special provisions or restrictions while driving an ATV on a highway and not knowing that central lane is a highway is no defense.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":290730,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[57167,57166,57169,57170,57168],"class_list":["post-290723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-atv","tag-g1-license","tag-ontario-automobile-policy","tag-summary-judgment-motion","tag-superior-court-of-justice-all-terrain-vehicle"],"yoast_head":"\nOntario SC allows third party liability insurance coverage to ATV operator driving with owner\u2019s consent | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Superior Court of Justice allows third party liability insurance coverage in Ontario for G1 license holder driving an ATV with owner\u2019s consent.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner's consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Superior Court of Justice allows third party liability insurance coverage in Ontario for G1 license holder driving an ATV with owner\u2019s consent.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-27T10:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner's consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Ontario SC allows third party liability insurance coverage to ATV operator driving with owner\u2019s consent | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-27T10:30:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Superior Court of Justice allows third party liability insurance coverage in Ontario for G1 license holder driving an ATV with owner\u2019s consent.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"superior court of justice, ontario\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner’s consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ontario SC allows third party liability insurance coverage to ATV operator driving with owner\u2019s consent | SCC Blog","description":"Superior Court of Justice allows third party liability insurance coverage in Ontario for G1 license holder driving an ATV with owner\u2019s consent.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner's consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario","og_description":"Superior Court of Justice allows third party liability insurance coverage in Ontario for G1 license holder driving an ATV with owner\u2019s consent.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-04-27T10:30:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner's consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","name":"Ontario SC allows third party liability insurance coverage to ATV operator driving with owner\u2019s consent | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp","datePublished":"2023-04-27T10:30:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Superior Court of Justice allows third party liability insurance coverage in Ontario for G1 license holder driving an ATV with owner\u2019s consent.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"superior court of justice, ontario"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/third-party-liability-coverage-granted-to-atv-operator-driving-without-proper-license-ontario-superior-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G1 license holder driving an ATV alone on highway for accessing trail with owner’s consent is minor breach: Superior Court of Justice, Ontario"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/superior-court-of-justice-ontario.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/11\/delhi-hc-refuses-specific-performance-relief-creation-third-party-interests-compensation-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":290723,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses decree of specific performance in view of creation of third-party interests; Directs compensation of Rs. 15 lakhs","author":"Arunima","date":"September 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The principle governing the evidence in civil cases is that there should be a preponderance of the events which should be proved unlike in criminal matters, where the evidence have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, the burden of proof is on the party which will suffer if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313728,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/cal-hc-dismisses-interlocutory-application-and-review-motion-due-to-unresolved-factual-disputes-and-stage-of-ongoing-suit-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":290723,"position":1},"title":"Unresolved factual \u2018Factual disputes should be resolved during trial\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses interlocutory application and Review motion","author":"Ritu","date":"February 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court emphasised the need for caution in granting relief at the interlocutory stage, particularly when it resembles final relief.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345785,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/15\/order-12-rule6-cpc-provisions-enabling-discretionary-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":290723,"position":2},"title":"Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also affirmed interpretation of Rule 6 by Delhi High Court in ITDC Limited v. Chander Pal Sood, wherein the High Court had held that Rule 6 gives a wide discretion to the Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Order XII Rule 6 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/20\/dhc-restrains-bohemia-from-engaging-with-third-parties-for-making-sound-recordings-without-prior-written-approval-from-saga-music-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":290723,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Bohemia from engaging with third parties for making sound recordings without prior written approval from Saga Music","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBohemia and his agents are restrained from posting, uploading, sharing, e-sharing and\/or publishing or causing any defamatory, disparaging, misleading posts against Saga Music (P) Ltd. on any social media or digital platform.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/11\/delhi-hc-puma-trademark-infringement-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":290723,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b911 lakh relief to Puma SE in trademark infringement case against counterfeit manufacturer","author":"Arunima","date":"March 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The infringing materials found on the site of the defendant are counterfeit goods of the plaintiff's products, affixed with the plaintiff's registered marks. A clear indicative of the counterfeiting activity towards the plaintiff's products, are the observations and photographs as attached by the Local Commissioner in its report.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380935,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sc-executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":290723,"position":5},"title":"Executing Court Bound to Execute Decree as Passed; Can\u2019t Modify Its Terms: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely for the reasons that exchange of some portions of the land may not be practicable for the reason that constructions on it are not as per the sanctioned map or that part of it has been sold off, are all immaterial.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Executing court cannot go beyond decree","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Executing-court-cannot-go-beyond-decree.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=290723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290723\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=290723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=290723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=290723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}