{"id":290702,"date":"2023-04-27T11:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-04-27T05:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=290702"},"modified":"2023-10-11T15:07:54","modified_gmt":"2023-10-11T09:37:54","slug":"karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka High Court comes to the aid of an aging couple wishing to have child via surrogacy; Evolves a three- pronged eligibility test"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p><b>Karnataka High Court:<\/b> While deciding the instant writ petition wherein the validity of Section 2(1)(zg) and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996466\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4(iii)(c)(I)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a> was questioned by an elderly couple desirous of having a child via surrogacy, the Bench of <b>M. Nagaprasanna, J.<\/b>*, noting the peculiar situation and in order to \u201c<i>iron the creases in the Surrogacy Act<\/i>\u201d evolved a \u2018Three Test Theory\u2019 and formulated the same to consider the application by the petitioners aged 57 and 45 years, for grant of an eligibility certificate to become parents by way of surrogacy. <b>These three tests are to determine the petitioners\u2019 genetic, economical and physical eligibility<\/b>. The tests are as follows-<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u2022 <b>Genetic Test-<\/b> It is imperative to test the strength of the sperm as the sperm contains genetic information necessary to make a new individual.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u2022 <b>Physical Test-<\/b> The intending couple must be in a position to take care of the child and cannot abandon the child on the ground that they are themselves infirmed to handle the child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">\u2022 <b>Economic Test-<\/b> The intending couple must be economically sound and should not lead the child to penury the moment it is born.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the State Surrogacy Board \/ Appropriate Authority \/ Prescribed Authority to consider the application by the petitioners for grant of an eligibility certificate as is necessary in law, based on the triple tests as indicated above.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Background of the Case:<\/b> The petitioners are husband and wife, who have a son born from the wedlock. However, due to health complications the wife had to undergo an operation in which her uterus had to be removed. The couple&#8217;s son who completed his MBBS degree and was undergoing internship at a college in Mangalore, unfortunately died in a road accident in December 2022. This loss caused the couple to go into depression.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Showing interest in adopting a child, the father visited several Shishu Kendras and the couple became aware of the process of registering with Central Adoption Resource Authority. However, they were told that there is large number of prospective parents registered in the organization and it would take minimum of 3 years for the couple to get a child in adoption. Later, on medical consultancy, the couple come to know that they can have a child by way of surrogacy, within nine months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Moving forward with the option of surrogacy, the husband&#8217;s sister-in-law came forward to donate her egg and a close family friend of the couple, agreed to be a surrogate mother. The sperm of the husband was to be used to fertilize the donated egg.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the impugned provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a> i.e., Section 2(1)(zg) and Section 4(iii)(c)(I) have prohibited the couple to have a child by way of surrogacy. Therefore, the instant petition has come up before the Court.<\/p>\n<p><b>Impugned provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a>:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Section 2(1) (zg)-<\/b> \u201c<i>surrogate mother<\/i>\u201d means a woman who agrees to bear a child (who is genetically related to the intending couple or intending woman) through surrogacy from the implantation of embryo in her womb and fulfils the conditions as provided in sub-clause (<i>b<\/i>) of clause (<i>iii<\/i>) of Section 4.<\/p>\n<p><b>Section 4(iii)-<\/b> no surrogacy or surrogacy procedures shall be conducted, undertaken, performed or initiated, unless the Director or in-charge of the surrogacy clinic and the person qualified to do so are satisfied, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the following conditions have been fulfilled, namely:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\"><b>(<i>c<\/i>)<\/b> an eligibility certificate for intending couple is issued separately by the appropriate authority on fulfilment of the following conditions, namely: \u2014<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 54pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>(I)<\/b> the intending couple are married and between the <b>age of 23 to 50 years in case of female<\/b> and between <b>26 to 55 years in case of male<\/b> on the day of certification.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Contentions:<\/b> The counsel for the couple contended that the impugned provisions have nothing to do with the object sought to be achieved, for enacting the 2021 Act. It was further contended that the age restriction in Section 4(iii)(c)(I) has no rationale behind it and must be obliterated. According to the counsel, it should be made age free, both to the husband and the wife who are intending couple. The petitioner also submitted that the surrogacy is altruistic.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>Per contra,<\/i> the respondents argued that merely because it does not suit the petitioners, a provision cannot be held to be contrary to law. The respondents further submitted that detailed deliberations have gone into while promulgating the 2021 Act as the country had become a hub of lending a womb for surrogacy, for people in India and abroad who are affluent, who would exploit the plight of poor women.<\/p>\n<p><b>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 Perusing the plight of the couple and contentions raised by the parties, the Court took note of the Supreme Court decision in <i>Baby Manji Yamada<\/i> v. <i>Union of India<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oVm35D7k\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2008) 13 SCC 518<\/a>, where the Court considered what is surrogacy and different kinds of surrogacy. The Court also noted the 2 types of surrogacies which have medically evolved- Gestational and Traditional. The Court also noted the difference between the two: in gestational surrogacy, the baby born, has no genetic link to the surrogate; in traditional surrogacy, the baby has a genetic link to the surrogate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 The Court also took note of the fact that surrogacy notoriously came to be called as \u201cwomb on rent\u201d when cases of exploitation became rampant. It was noted that the Parliament thought it fit to regulate surrogacy in India, hence, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a> came into being.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 The Court also took a detailed note of the several relevant provisions of 2021 Act, including the impugned ones. The Court also took note of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996047\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a> which prescribes the reproductive assistance and its regulation and deals with the intention and procedure for intending couple to become surrogate parents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 The Court observed that sudden loss of a son or a daughter, in the prime of their youth, is a terrible blow to the parents and one of the most painful moments of one&#8217;s life is to be the pall bearer of a deceased son or a daughter. Considering the events which led the couple to opt for surrogacy, the Court pointed out that definition in Section 2(1)(zg) mandates a surrogate mother can only be a woman who agrees to bear a child who is genetically related to the intending couple or intending woman. However, in the case at hand, the surrogate mother is not genetically related to the couple, though the donor of the egg is related to the couple.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 Taking note of Section 4(iii)(c)(I), the Court pointed out that the mother in this case comes within the provisions of law as she is yet to cross 50 years. The father however has crossed 55 years of age and he is 57 years. The Court declined to accept the couple&#8217;s submission as to there being no rationale behind the stipulation of the cut off age. Given the situation in the instant case, the Court opined that, \u201c<i>it is necessary to iron out the creases in the legislation<\/i>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 In order to address the peculiar situation at hand, the Court formulated three tests to determines the petitioners\u2019 eligibility vis-\u00e0-vis genetics, economic condition and physical ability to raise a child-<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 54pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u2022 The father shall undertake to undergo the genetic test for determination of the strength of the gamete\/sperm and its quality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 54pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u2022 The economic capacity of the intending couple for the growth of the child and to place the measures taken to secure the life by creation of property or any fixed deposit in the name of the child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 54pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u2022 Measures to be taken for the upbringing of the child, if in case the father or the mother are not physically able to bring up the child. \u201c<i>This would not mean the petitioners would abandon the child or leave it at the mercy of anybody else<\/i>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 <b>The Court observed that it is for the legislature to ponder over the issue, as the 2021 Act nowhere leaves any discretion to the Board (National or the State) and the Appropriate Authority (Centre or the State) to have any play in the joints to salvage any unique situation, to consider and issue eligibility certificate to the intending couples<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u27a2 The Court was of the opinion that the words \u201c<i>genetically related<\/i>\u201d appearing in Section 2(1)(zg) can only mean that the child to be born through surrogacy should be genetically related to the intending couple; failing which, the words genetically related would not have any meaning if it were to be said that the surrogate mother should be genetically related to the intending couple. That defeats both altruism and logic.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">\u27a2 The Court took note of the fact that the entire gamut of challenge to the provisions of the Act is pending consideration before the Supreme Court where the National Board of Surrogacy has been asked to submit their reply to all the contentions advanced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">H. Siddaraju v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/a692fsto\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Kar 16<\/a>, decided on 21-04-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Order written by Justice M. Nagaprasanna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">A. Sampath, appearing for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">M.N. Kumar, Central Government Council, appearing for the Respondents 1 and 2.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>The High Court was hearing a petition filed by a couple aged 57 and 45 years, who had lost their son to road accident, and wanted to re-experience the bliss of parenthood via surrogacy but were barred by certain provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":285849,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3422,19581,57161,28334,3225,57160,57162],"class_list":["post-290702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Adoption","tag-child","tag-eligibility-test","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-Surrogacy","tag-surrogacy-regulation-act-2021","tag-surrogacy-board"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka HC frames Three Test Theory for child via surrogacy | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court evolved a three-test theory for an aging couple trying to have a child via surrogacy.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka High Court comes to the aid of an aging couple wishing to have child via surrogacy; Evolves a three- pronged eligibility test\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court evolved a three-test theory for an aging couple trying to have a child via surrogacy.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-27T05:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-11T09:37:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC frames Three Test Theory for child via surrogacy | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-27T05:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-11T09:37:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Karnataka High Court evolved a three-test theory for an aging couple trying to have a child via surrogacy.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka High Court comes to the aid of an aging couple wishing to have child via surrogacy; Evolves a three- pronged eligibility test\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC frames Three Test Theory for child via surrogacy | SCC Blog","description":"Karnataka High Court evolved a three-test theory for an aging couple trying to have a child via surrogacy.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka High Court comes to the aid of an aging couple wishing to have child via surrogacy; Evolves a three- pronged eligibility test","og_description":"Karnataka High Court evolved a three-test theory for an aging couple trying to have a child via surrogacy.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-04-27T05:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-11T09:37:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/","name":"Karnataka HC frames Three Test Theory for child via surrogacy | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg","datePublished":"2023-04-27T05:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-11T09:37:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Karnataka High Court evolved a three-test theory for an aging couple trying to have a child via surrogacy.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/27\/karnataka-high-court-aid-aging-couple-wishing-to-have-child-via-surrogacy-legal-news-law-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka High Court comes to the aid of an aging couple wishing to have child via surrogacy; Evolves a three- pronged eligibility test"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":288638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/madras-high-court-directs-state-to-constitute-district-medical-board-for-issuing-medical-certificates-for-undergoing-surrogacy-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":290702,"position":0},"title":"Madras High Court directs State to constitute District Medical Board for issuing medical certificates for undergoing surrogacy","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While the constitutionality of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 is pending consideration before the Supreme Court, Madras High Court noted that even those who are eligible under the Act are not able to have their treatment procedures done because the authorities concerned are unaware of the procedures to be followed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/surrogacy-regulation-act-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":290702,"position":1},"title":"Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On December 25, 2021, the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 received President's assent in order to regulate the practice and process of surrogacy, constitute National Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Board, State Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Boards.\u00a0 Key features of the Act: I. Prohibition and regulation of surrogacy clinics: No\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254743,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/27\/reproductive-health-and-surrogacy-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":290702,"position":2},"title":"A Comprehensive Analysis on Reproductive Health and Surrogacy in India: A Study on the Law, Policy, and Practice","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr D. Radhika Yadav\u2020 and Pavan Kasturi\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-119-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-119-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-119-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-119-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-119-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367222,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/20\/mad-hc-surrogacy-act-petitions-not-routine-applications-treat-with-sensitivity-compassion\/","url_meta":{"origin":290702,"position":3},"title":"Petitions under Surrogacy Act must be treated with &#8216;sensitivity, responsibility, and compassion&#8217;, not as routine applications: Madras High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPetitions filed under the Surrogacy Act must not be treated as routine applications, as they concern one of the deepest aspirations of human life, the desire of childless couples to have a child.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Surrogacy Act Petitions","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Surrogacy-Act-Petitions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Surrogacy-Act-Petitions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Surrogacy-Act-Petitions.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Surrogacy-Act-Petitions.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305684,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/notification-disallowing-use-of-donor-gametes-in-surrogacy-contradicts-surrogacy-act-art-act-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":290702,"position":4},"title":"Notification disallowing use of donor gametes in surrogacy contradicts principles under Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNotification No. 179(E) issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare must be held to be prospective in application as petitioners have already secured requisite Certificate of Medical Indication from Delhi State Level Medical Board, Department of Family Welfare prior to amendment taking effect.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363509,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/sc-retrospective-application-of-age-limit-under-surrogacy-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":290702,"position":5},"title":"Age limit under Surrogacy Act not applicable to couples who froze embryos prior to commencement of law: Supreme Court","author":"Arushi","date":"October 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Before 25-1-2022, there were no binding laws regarding age restrictions on intending couples wishing to avail surrogacy. Therefore, for couples above the age limits under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, the right to surrogacy was not conditional on their age and was freely available to intending couples.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"age limit under Surrogacy Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/age-limit-under-Surrogacy-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/age-limit-under-Surrogacy-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/age-limit-under-Surrogacy-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/age-limit-under-Surrogacy-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=290702"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290702\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/285849"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=290702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=290702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=290702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}