{"id":29061,"date":"2015-12-14T09:28:15","date_gmt":"2015-12-14T03:58:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=29061"},"modified":"2015-12-22T12:13:53","modified_gmt":"2015-12-22T06:43:53","slug":"sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/","title":{"rendered":"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:<\/strong> While considering the present issue that whether the pre-printed, non- transferrable vouchers printed by the name Sodexo Meal vouchers, can be levied with Local body tax (LBT), the division bench of A.K. Sikri and R.F. Nariman, JJ., setting aside the judgment of the Bombay High Court, held that the business that <em>Sodexo Meal Vouchers <\/em>are not &#8216;goods&#8217; within the meaning of Section 2(25) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and, therefore, not liable for either Octroi or LBT.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the appellant Jay Savla was vociferous in his submission that the vouchers were only a service which was provided by the appellant with no element of &#8216;goods&#8217; involved in the transaction. On the other hand, the Bombay High Court , relying on the views expressed in <em>Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh <\/em>(2005) 1 SCC 308<em>, <\/em>\u00a0passed the Order that these vouchers are capable of being sold, paid, stored and possessed, thereby validating the levy of tax on the appellant for their business.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court on perusing the contentions and the concerned statutory provisions, observed that the High Court erred in interpreting the nature of the vouchers as the nature of their transactions does \u00a0not refer something that comes under the ambit of \u00a0&#8216;goods&#8217;, rather they are services as defined by law and thus levying the Octroi or local body taxes on them is unreasonable. The Court further observed that the High Court has not discussed and decided the issue correctly. The bench , thus, allowed the appeals and set aside the judgment of the High Court by holding that the vouchers are not &#8216;goods&#8217; within the meaning of Section 2(25), and therefore, not liable for paying either Octroi or LBT. [<em>Sodexo SVC India Private Ltd<\/em>. v<em>. <\/em><em>State of Maharashtra,<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_SC_1291\">2015 SCC OnLine SC 1291<\/a>, decided on 09.12.2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: While considering the present issue that whether the pre-printed, non- transferrable vouchers printed by the name Sodexo Meal vouchers, can <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2621,4161],"class_list":["post-29061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Tax","tag-vouchers"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: While considering the present issue that whether the pre-printed, non- transferrable vouchers printed by the name Sodexo Meal vouchers, can\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-14T03:58:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-22T06:43:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/\",\"name\":\"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-14T03:58:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-22T06:43:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949","og_description":"Supreme Court: While considering the present issue that whether the pre-printed, non- transferrable vouchers printed by the name Sodexo Meal vouchers, can","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-12-14T03:58:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-22T06:43:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/","name":"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2015-12-14T03:58:15+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-22T06:43:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/14\/sodexo-meal-vouchers-are-not-goods-within-the-meaning-of-s-225-of-maharashtra-municipal-corporation-act-1949\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not \u2018goods\u2019 within the meaning of S. 2(25) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/14\/bom-hc-allows-remedy-of-appeal-section406-mmcact\/","url_meta":{"origin":29061,"position":0},"title":"Assailing vires of a statutory provision does not oblige Court to examine and entertain petitions: Bombay High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"August 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal under Section 406 of MMC Act assailing the impugned assessment orders within 4 weeks, to be adjudicated by appellate authority on merits.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/21\/authority-of-advanced-ruling-input-tax-credit-central-goods-and-services-act-vouchers-subscription-packages-gift-movable-property-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":29061,"position":1},"title":"Authority of Advanced Ruling | Myntra ineligible to avail input tax credit on vouchers and subscription packages procured from third party","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Authority of Advanced Ruling (Karnataka): In an application filed to sought advance ruling on the question that, whether the applicant would be eligible to avail the input tax credit, in terms of Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services (\u2018CGST\u2019) Act , 2017, on vouchers and subscription\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advance Rulings&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR GST","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/gst-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/22\/del-hc-execution-of-discharge-voucher-acknowledging-settlement-bars-further-claims\/","url_meta":{"origin":29061,"position":2},"title":"Execution of discharge voucher acknowledging full and final settlement bars further claims unless obtained by fraud, coercion, or undue influence: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 22, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"When to step in and when to not, \u201cthe line is thin, but Courts are expected to possess the intellectual wherewithal to discern it and walk the right side.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"execution of discharge voucher","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/execution-of-discharge-voucher.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/execution-of-discharge-voucher.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/execution-of-discharge-voucher.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/execution-of-discharge-voucher.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/allahabad-high-court-orders-interim-stay-on-the-gst-demand-of-rs-1081-crores-against-paytms-parent-company-one-97-communications-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":29061,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad High Court orders interim stay on the GST demand of Rs. 1,081 crores against Paytm&#8217;s parent company, One 97 communications","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court adjourned the tax writ of Paytm's parent company, will decide the issue that whether the supply of mobile recharge coupons and DTH recharge vouchers to recipients, who are in other States, would be interstate supply or intra-state supply.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":370174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/18\/bombay-hc-license-fee-on-sky-signs-regulatory-not-tax\/","url_meta":{"origin":29061,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court holds License fee on sky-signs and hoardings to be regulatory fee, not tax, despite GST","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe control and regulation of sky-signs and hoardings in the modern times is a significant challenge for the municipal bodies who are caught between a balance to be brought about by such high technological advancements.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Licence fee on sky signs regulatory","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Licence-fee-on-sky-signs-regulatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Licence-fee-on-sky-signs-regulatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Licence-fee-on-sky-signs-regulatory.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Licence-fee-on-sky-signs-regulatory.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/application-of-false-trade-description-can-be-proved-by-circumstantial-evidence-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":29061,"position":5},"title":"Never Reported Judgment| Application of False trade descriptions can be proven through circumstantial evidence, not just positive affirmative evidence [1951 SCC 549]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1951 on Section 6 of the Merchandise Marks Act, 1889.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"section 6 merchandise marks act 1889","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-6-merchandise-marks-act-1889.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-6-merchandise-marks-act-1889.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-6-merchandise-marks-act-1889.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-6-merchandise-marks-act-1889.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29061"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29061\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}