{"id":288648,"date":"2023-04-06T12:00:09","date_gmt":"2023-04-06T06:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=288648"},"modified":"2023-04-07T15:36:38","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T10:06:38","slug":"sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 document.title = '[Media One News] Supreme Court judgment on sealed cover procedure | SCC Blog'\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 document.querySelector('meta[name=\"description\"]').setAttribute(\"content\", \"Supreme Court judgment on sealed cover procedure upholds principle of natural justice and lifted ban on Media One TV broadcast\");\n<\/script><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Supreme Court:<\/b> In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL) to uplink and downlink a news and current affairs television channel called \u201cMedia One\u201d, the bench of <b>Dr DY Chandrachud<\/b>*, CJ and Hima Kohli, J has held that by not providing a reasoned order denying the renewal of license, not disclosing the relevant material, and by disclosing the material only to the court in a sealed cover, the Union of India has violated the MBL&#8217;s right to a fair hearing protected under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"color: #632423;\">Why Public Interest Immunity proceedings to be preferred over Sealed Cover Procedure<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This case led to the Supreme Court laying down the procedure for conducting public interest immunity proceedings which, it opined, was a better alternative to the sealed cover procedure which does not ensure a fairer proceeding. The Court stated that the effect of public interest immunity proceedings of removing the evidence completely from the proceedings would persuade the State in making restricted claims of public interest immunity.<\/p>\n<p>The Court explained that the power of the court to receive material relevant to a proceeding in a sealed cover is read from Order XIII Rule 7. Unlike the closed material procedure in the United Kingdom and Canada, the sealed cover procedure is not a creation of the legislature but of the courts. In fact, Rule 7 while prescribing the power of the court to receive material in a sealed cover also recognises non-disclosure on the ground of public interest immunity. The provision does not stipulate any guidelines for the exercise of power by the court to secure material in a sealed cover. However, the Rule as a whole indicates that the court may exercise its power to secure material in a sealed cover if the material is confidential or the disclosure of which would injure public interest. The public interest immunity claims also seek to address the same harms.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>\u201cIt was not intended that the sealed cover procedure shall replace public interest immunity proceedings which constitute an established method for dealing with claims of confidentiality. The sealed cover procedure cannot be introduced to cover harms that could not have been remedied by public interest immunity proceedings.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Explaining the procedure for conducting the public interest immunity proceedings, the Court explained that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>\u201cThe courts could adopt the course of action of redacting the confidential portions of the document and providing a summary of the contents of the document instead of opting for the sealed cover procedure to fairly exclude the document from the proceedings on a successful public interest immunity claim. Both the parties can then only be permitted to refer to the redacted version of the document or the summary in the proceeding.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also explained the difference between the two and said that in both the sealed cover procedure and public interest immunity claims, the documents that are sought to be withheld from disclosure are not revealed to the counsel for the applicant. The proceedings, in effect, are conducted ex-parte where the counsel for the party claiming disclosure is precluded from accessing a part of the record in the proceedings. However, one crucial difference between the sealed cover procedure and public interest immunity claims is that in the former, the court relies on the material that is disclosed in a sealed cover in the course of the proceedings, as opposed to the latter where the documents are completely removed from the proceedings and both the parties and the adjudicator cannot rely on such material. <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Sealed cover procedures violate both principles of natural justice and open justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, it could be seen that the public interest immunity proceeding is a less restrictive means to deal with non-disclosure on the grounds of public interest and confidentiality.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"color: #632423;\">Scope of use of sealed cover procedure<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the issues as to <b>whether the procedure of sealed cover can be used at all<\/b>, and if so, in what circumstances would it be permissible for the court to exercise its power to secure evidence in a sealed cover, the Court observed that while it cannot lay down the possible situations when the sealed cover procedure can be used, it is sufficient to state that <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">if the purpose could be realised effectively by public interest immunity proceedings or any other less restrictive means, then the sealed cover procedure should not be adopted<\/span>. The court should undertake an analysis of the possible procedural modalities that could be used to realise the purpose, and the means that are less restrictive of the procedural guarantees must be adopted.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"color: #632423;\">Will Public Interest Immunity proceedings render proceedings non-justiciable?<\/h4>\n<p>On the <b>argument that the removal of the documents from the proceedings would render the proceedings non-justiciable<\/b> if the documents that are sought to be protected are so closely intertwined with the cause of action, the Court held that the same does not hold water as one of the relevant considerations for the court in the balancing stage of adjudicating the public interest immunity claim is whether the non-disclosure of the material would render the issue non-justiciable. The court while analysing the relevancy of the material and the potential non-justiciability of the issue due to non-disclosure may direct that the material should be disclosed. The purpose of the balancing prong is to weigh in the conflicting claims and effects of such claims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>\u201cEven if the disclosure would conceivably injure public interest, the courts may still dismiss the claim of public interest immunity if the non-disclosure would render the issue non-justiciable, and on the facts of the case it is decided that the injury due to non-disclosure overweighs the injury due to disclosure.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p><b><i>Amicus curiae&#8217;s role<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p>On the <b>issue of dilution of procedural guarantees while hearing the claim<\/b>, the Court made clear that <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">it is only the Court and the party seeking non-disclosure of the material who are privy to the public interest immunity proceedings<\/span>. The court has a duty to consider factors such as the relevance of the material to the case of the applicant while undertaking the proportionality standard to test the public interest immunity claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><i>\u201cWhile there may be material on serious concerns of national security which cannot be disclosed; the constitutional principle of procedural guarantees is equally important and it cannot be turned into a dead letter. As the highest constitutional court, it is our responsibility to balance these two considerations when they are in conflict.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Observing that the applicant who is unrepresented in the proceedings would be effectively impaired, the Court held that to safeguard the claimant against a potential injury to procedural guarantees in public interest immunity proceedings, the Court has the power to appoint an <i>amicus curiae<\/i>, which will balance concerns of confidentiality with the need to preserve public confidence in the objectivity of the justice delivery process.<\/p>\n<p>The <i>amicus curiae<\/i> appointed by the Court shall,<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Be given access to the materials sought to be withheld by the State; and<\/li>\n<li>Be allowed to interact with the applicant and their counsel before the proceedings to ascertain their case to enable them to make effective submissions on the necessity of disclosure.<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Be bound by oath to not disclose or discuss the material with any other person, including the applicant or their counsel.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the <i>amicus curiae<\/i> shall not interact with the applicant or their counsel after the public interest immunity proceeding has begun, and the counsel has viewed the document sought to be withheld.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"color: #632423;\">Reasoned Order<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that while Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574877\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">145<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> stipulates that all judgments of the Supreme Court shall only be delivered in open court, though public interest immunity proceedings will take place in a closed setting, the Court is required to pass a reasoned order for allowing or dismissing the claim in open court. Being cognizant of the objection that may be raised that an order justifying the reasons for allowing the claim would have to inevitably disclose information on the very material that it seeks to protect, the Court explained that the Court in such cases is still required to provide a reasoned order on the principles that it had considered and applied, even if the material that is sought to not be disclosed is redacted from the reasoned order. However, the redacted material from the reasoned order shall be preserved in the court records which may be accessed by the courts in the future, if the need arises.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"color: #632423;\">National Security<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also held that tough confidentiality and national security are legitimate aims for the purpose of limiting procedural guarantees, a blanket immunity to State from disclosure of all investigative reports cannot be granted.<\/p>\n<p>The Court, hence, made clear that the validity of the claim of involvement of national security considerations must be assessed on the test of<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(i) whether there is material to conclude that the non-disclosure of information is in the interest of national security; and<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">(ii) whether a reasonable prudent person would draw the same inference from the material on record.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7HXiL9ms\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 366<\/a>, decided on 05-04-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by CJI Dr DY Chandrachud.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"drIl8FDXX8\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/15\/not-here-to-do-miracles-but-to-work-on-bringing-institutional-changes-justice-dy-chandrachud-shares-his-to-do-list-as-the-50th-cji\/\">Not here to do miracles but to work on bringing institutional changes: Justice DY Chandrachud shares his to-do list as the 50th CJI<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Not here to do miracles but to work on bringing institutional changes: Justice DY Chandrachud shares his to-do list as the 50th CJI&#8221; &#8212; SCC Blog\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/15\/not-here-to-do-miracles-but-to-work-on-bringing-institutional-changes-justice-dy-chandrachud-shares-his-to-do-list-as-the-50th-cji\/embed\/#?secret=cDEgso06XD#?secret=drIl8FDXX8\" data-secret=\"drIl8FDXX8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For MBL: Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For editor, Senior Web Designer and Senior Camera Man of Media One: Senior Advocate Huzefa A Ahmedi;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Kerala Union of Working Journalists: Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Observing that the sealed cover procedure violates both principles of natural justice and open justice, the Supreme Court has held that the public interest immunity proceeding is a less restrictive means to deal with non-disclosure on the grounds of public interest and confidentiality.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":288656,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32731,54013,47201,56547,18781,2805,56546,49167,56545,20511,42529,49659,56544,5363],"class_list":["post-288648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-amicus-curiae","tag-cji-dy-chandrachud","tag-justice-hima-kohli","tag-media-one","tag-national-security","tag-natural_justice","tag-non-disclosure-of-material","tag-open-justice","tag-public-interest-immunity","tag-reasoned-order","tag-sealed-cover","tag-sealed-cover-jurisprudence","tag-sealed-cover-proceedings","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL)\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-06T06:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-07T10:06:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-06T06:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-07T10:06:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"description\":\"In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL)\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Sealed Cover\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court | SCC Times","description":"In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court","og_description":"In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-04-06T06:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-04-07T10:06:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/","name":"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg","datePublished":"2023-04-06T06:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-07T10:06:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"description":"In a case where the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had revoked the permission granted to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (MBL)","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Sealed Cover"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":288672,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-new-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":288648,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Denying security clearance to a Media Channel for critical views has \u2018chilling effect\u2019 on Press Freedom\u2019: Breakdown of Supreme Court&#8217;s Media One Verdict","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court held that the critical views of the Media One News Channel on Government policies cannot be termed \u2018anti-establishment\u2019 as the use of such a terminology in itself, represents an expectation that the press must support the establishment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Media One News","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1021.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1021.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1021.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1021.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/14\/from-secrecy-to-transparency-rethinking-sealed-cover-procedures-under-the-sakshya-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":288648,"position":1},"title":"From Secrecy to Transparency: Rethinking Sealed Cover Procedures under the Sakshya Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kunal Parihar*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Secrecy to Transparency","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Secrecy-to-Transparency.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Secrecy-to-Transparency.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Secrecy-to-Transparency.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Secrecy-to-Transparency.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/sealed-cover-jurisprudence-state-privilege-disclosure-information-madras-high-court-natural-justice-velumani-supreme-court-india-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":288648,"position":2},"title":"Madras High Court&#8217;s decision to keep enquiry report in a sealed cover in SP Velumani graft case doesn&#8217;t sit well with Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Madras High Court had ordered an enquiry and obtained a report without\u00a0\u00a0 furnishing a copy thereof to Tamil Nadu Minister SP Velumani in a corruption case and unceremoniously closed the writ petition, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJ* and Krishna Murari and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/26\/sealed-cover-procedure-govt-employee-sanction-prosecution-investigation-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":288648,"position":3},"title":"Pending investigation &amp; grant of prosecution sanction against Govt. employee not sufficient to adopt sealed cover procedure: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The sealed cover procedure is to be resorted to only after issuance of the charge-memo\/charge-sheet is issued.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sealed cover procedure government employees","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sealed-cover-procedure-government-employees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sealed-cover-procedure-government-employees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sealed-cover-procedure-government-employees.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sealed-cover-procedure-government-employees.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319123,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/cant-withhold-promotion-and-keep-in-sealed-cover-due-to-28-year-old-pending-criminal-case-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":288648,"position":4},"title":"Promotion can\u2019t be kept in sealed cover due to pendency of 28-year-old criminal case: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that petitioner, a police officer, was a member of the party which was deputed to nab a dreaded anti-social element of Uttar Pradesh, namely Kamaluddin.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/live-streaming-of-court-proceedings-recommendations-by-ag-kk-venugopal\/","url_meta":{"origin":288648,"position":5},"title":"Live Streaming of Court proceedings| Recommendations by AG KK Venugopal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJustice should be administered in an open court\u201d Supreme Court: In the matter concerning live streaming of court proceedings, the Attorney General KK Venugopal suggested \u201cGuidelines for Live Streaming of Court proceedings in Supreme Court\u201d. A writ petition was filed seeking a declaration for permitting live streaming of Supreme Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/288656"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}