{"id":287973,"date":"2023-03-27T11:00:53","date_gmt":"2023-03-27T05:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=287973"},"modified":"2023-04-03T14:19:02","modified_gmt":"2023-04-03T08:49:02","slug":"technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court’s conviction order in fake marksheet case"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/b> In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2)<\/a> of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973<\/a> against the judgment passed by special judge (MP\/MLA\/Additional Sessions), wherein the Trial Court has convicted and sentenced the convicts the Single Judge bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh J. set aside the appeal on the ground that technical objections taken at the stage of appeal has no relevance, objection should positively be raised at trial stage.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/b><\/p>\n

In the case at hand, the convicts have forged their mark-sheets and took admission in B.Sc Part – II, B.Sc Part -III, LLB Part – II respectively. However, show cause notice were issued by the Principle but they never replied to the notice. On that Principle consequently requested the police to implead against these convicts, who had taken admission based on forged and fabricated mark-sheets\/documents and played fraud with college administration and the University.<\/p>\n

Further, Senior Superintendent of Police directs Station House Officer to register and investigate the offence. In pursuance to the said direction, Investigating Officer filed the charge sheet against convicts under Section 468<\/a>, 471<\/a> and 420<\/a> of the Penal Code 1860<\/a>. After taking the cognizance, convicts denied the charges and claimed trial.<\/p>\n

The prosecution to prove its case, examined Office Superintendent of the College and Senior Assistant. They collectively verified the certified copy of the paper and also concrete the signature of the Principle. Therefore, alleged that all the convicts had taken admission based on forged mark sheets.<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/b><\/p>\n

The convicts Contended that as per Section 154<\/a> of Cr.P.C.<\/a>, FIR related to offences committed should be in same course of the transaction and as per Sections 221<\/a> and 223<\/a> of Cr.P.C.<\/a> for every distinct offence there shall be a separate charge & for every such charge there shall be separate trial. In this matter there was no allegation of criminal conspiracy and abetment among the convicts. They are three different individuals with different perception. Perhaps, convicts were tried jointly which vitiated the procedure.<\/p>\n

It was alleged that only photocopies of the mark-sheets forged by the convicts were produced before the Trial Court. The Trial Court had convicted the convicts on the basis of the secondary evidence which vitiated the entire trial proceedings of Section 65<\/a> of the Evidence Act, 1872<\/a><\/p>\n

Respondent Contended that convicts had never taken objection or denied regarding the admissibility and existence of the documentary evidence. It is further contended that the convicts have also not taken any objection in respect of their trial together or lodging of one FIR or framing of common charge for the offence. Hence, it is not open for them to take this objection at this stage of the appeal.<\/p>\n

It was further submitted that convict-1 and convict- 3 is a Mafia, gangster and dreaded criminal and his character is also important while deciding the appeal.<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/b><\/p>\n

Placing reliance on Muddasani Venkata Narasaiah<\/i> v. Muddasani Sarojana<\/i>, (2016) 12 SCC 288<\/a>, the Court said that witnesses have proved the forged mark-sheets and admission forms of the convict, on the basis of which they had taken admission. The evidence of the prosecution witnesses had gone un-rebutted and, Court finds that their testimony was cogent and credible to bring home the charge against convicts.<\/p>\n

The Court further relied upon P.C. Purushotham Reddiar<\/i> v. V.S. Perumal<\/i>, (1972) 1 SCC 9<\/a> and said that when they had not taken any objection with respect to the admissibility of the documents during trial and the documents were proved by the witnesses, at this stage it is not open for them to take such objection in the appeal.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the document in terms of Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act is to be proved by a person, who is acquainted with the hand writing of the author thereof the witnesses have proved the documents and they were acquainted with the hand writing and signatures of the then Principal and the Sub-Inspector<\/p>\n

The Court held that convicts are not in a position to say that they were prejudiced in any manner by common FIR, one charge sheet and same charge for all three convicts and one trial. The allegations are identical. witnesses were common, who had proved the documents and deposed in support of the charge, thus rejected the technical plea for having no substance.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court said that evidence lead by the prosecution, the offences under Sections 420<\/a>, 468<\/a> and 471<\/a> IPC<\/a> are fully made out and proved against the convicts and, thus, held that the Trial Court has rightly convicted and sentenced the convicts for the aforesaid offences.<\/p>\n

Further, directed that the convicts shall be taken into custody forthwith to serve out the sentence as awarded by the Trial Court<\/p>\n

[Indra Pratap Tiwari v State of U.P,2023 SCC OnLine All 86<\/a>, order dated 16-03-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel of Appellant: Advocate Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ishan Baghel, Advocate Manoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Salil Kumar Srivastava;<\/p>\n

Advocate Rama Niwas Pathak c;<\/p>\n

Advocate Diwakar Singh, Advocate Alka Singh;<\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondent: Government Advocates Anuj Pandey, Asok Pande, Sushil Kumar Singh.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court said that the convicts are not in a position to say that they were prejudiced in any manner by common FIR, one charge sheet and same charge for all three convicts and one trial.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":284708,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2676,2510,32378,13671,56274,33586,13961,56275],"class_list":["post-287973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Admission","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-cheating","tag-criminal-procedure-code","tag-forged-mark-sheet","tag-forgery","tag-ipc","tag-secondary-evidence"],"yoast_head":"\nTechnical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court's conviction order in fake marksheet case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment passed by special judge\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court's conviction order in fake marksheet case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment passed by special judge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-27T05:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-03T08:49:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court's conviction order in fake marksheet case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-27T05:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-03T08:49:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment passed by special judge\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court’s conviction order in fake marksheet case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court's conviction order in fake marksheet case | SCC Times","description":"In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment passed by special judge","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court's conviction order in fake marksheet case","og_description":"In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment passed by special judge","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-03-27T05:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-04-03T08:49:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","name":"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court's conviction order in fake marksheet case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png","datePublished":"2023-03-27T05:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-03T08:49:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In a case wherein an appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment passed by special judge","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/technical-objection-cannot-to-taken-at-the-stage-of-appeal-allahabad-hc-upholds-trial-courts-conviction-order-in-fake-mark-sheets-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Technical objection cannot be taken at the stage of appeal: Allahabad HC upholds Trial Court’s conviction order in fake marksheet case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":317871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/20\/allahabad-high-court-refuses-quash-chargesheet-3-men-accused-rasing-anti-india-slogans-temple\/","url_meta":{"origin":287973,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad HC declines to quash criminal proceedings against 3 men accused of raising slogans against India, and abusing persons in a Temple","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that, while deciding an application under Section 482 CrPC, it can only examine whether the case for trial of the accused person is made out on the basis of prosecution allegations and the material collected in support thereof.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/05\/findings-high-court-based-conjectures-surmises-supreme-court-acquits-murder-convicts\/","url_meta":{"origin":287973,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court acquits murder convicts; reverses High Court findings based on conjectures and surmises","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the elaborate exercise of the trial Judge has been washed away by the High Court in a totally cursory manner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"murder convicts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282015,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/allahabad-high-court-sets-aside-ghazipur-sessions-judge-order-granting-superior-class-to-up-ex-mla-mukhtar-ansari-in-prison\/","url_meta":{"origin":287973,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court sets aside Ghazipur Sessions Judge order granting superior class to UP-ex MLA Mukhtar Ansari, in prison","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that Mukhtar Ansari is a known gangster, a dreaded criminal and bahubali and more than 50 criminal cases have been registered against him.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":282726,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/charge-that-convicts-had-committed-murder-not-proved-beyond-reasonable-doubt-hence-they-are-entitled-to-the-benefit-of-doubt-reiterates-supreme-court-while-acquitting-murder-convicts-legal-research-le\/","url_meta":{"origin":287973,"position":3},"title":"Murder convicts in a 37-year-old case to walk free after Supreme Court gives them benefit of doubt","author":"Editor","date":"January 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court held that the charge that the convicts had committed murder was not proved beyond reasonable doubt; hence, they were and are entitled to the benefit of doubt. Thus, it set aside the Trial Court and Allahabad High Court's judgment and order and acquitted the convicts.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Murder convicts in a 37-year-old case to walk free after Supreme Court gives them benefit of doubt","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-99.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":279650,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/allahabad-high-court-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-as-slp-is-pending-in-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":287973,"position":4},"title":"Allahabad High Court stays criminal proceedings against Delhi’s CM Arvind Kejriwal as SLP is pending in Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Criminal proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal in Sultanpur Court have been stayed by Allahabad High Court, considering that special leave to appeal is still pending in Supreme Court and if it is allowed, then the entire proceedings would be a futile exercise.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":337432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/18\/kerala-hc-issues-directions-to-prevent-mistaken-trial-of-juvenile-as-adults\/","url_meta":{"origin":287973,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No law fixes responsibility on officers to verify age of arrestees\u2019: Kerala HC issues directions to prevent mistaken trial of juveniles as adults","author":"Editor","date":"December 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is most unfortunate that the convicts had to undergo incarceration in prison for a period of about 14 years due to the failure of the authorities concerned to take note of the fact that they were juveniles at the time of the commission of the crime.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287973\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=287973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=287973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}