{"id":287738,"date":"2023-03-25T12:00:08","date_gmt":"2023-03-25T06:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=287738"},"modified":"2023-04-03T15:44:23","modified_gmt":"2023-04-03T10:14:23","slug":"drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 document.title = 'MPHC directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd. | SCC Blog'\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 document.querySelector('meta[name=\"description\"]').setAttribute(\"content\", \"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs Debt Recovery Tribunal to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd. under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.\");<\/script><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court |<\/span> While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sujoy Paul*<\/span> and Amar Nath (Kesharwani) JJ., held that when filing of a document is not a condition precedent for entertaining and registering an application under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act, then same should not be expected by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner, M\/s Agrawal Coal and Logistics filed a case against the Tata Motors Finance Ltd. under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) the repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act. The Registrar of DRT vide order dated 03-03-2023, refused to register the case on the ground that there is no document to show that the repossession of vehicle took place under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner thereafter preferred an appeal before the Presiding Officer of DRT which was also dismissed vide order dated 09-03-2023. Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 09-03-2023 passed by the Presiding Officer of DRT, the petitioner preferred a writ petition before this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that there was no reason for DRT to disbelieve the pleadings and neither the SARFAESI Act nor the Rules make it obligatory to file any such document to substantiate the case. The petitioner relied on S. 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act which provides that any person aggrieved by any of the measures taken by secured creditor, as referred in S. 13(4), may approach DRT. The petitioner further contended that S. 17(1) talks about whether measure has been taken or not, it nowhere talks about existence of any documentary evidence for that purpose, therefore, the Registrar and Presiding Officer of the DRT has committed an error in declining registration of application under S. 17 of the said Act.<\/p>\n<p>The Court observed that the Presiding Officer of DRT had accepted the petitioner&#39;s pleading that the vehicle was repossessed, and no documents were made available to the petitioner. The Court further observed that when no document is provided to the petitioner then it is impossible for the petitioner to produce the document and the same should not be expected by the DRT. Moreover, when filing of such document is not a condition precedent for entertaining and registering an application under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act, then the same should not be asked by the DRT.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;A conjoint reading of Section 13(4) of Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act makes it clear that what is required to be established is that the secured creditor has taken measure under sub-Section(4) of Section 13 in order to invoke the remedy under Section 17 of the said Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court set aside the impugned order dated 03-03-2023 and order dated 09-03-2023 passed by the Registrar and Presiding Officer respectively. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court directed the DRT to register the application preferred by the petitioner under S. 17 of the Act and proceed in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Agrawal Coals and Logistics v. DRT, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/f3lj8wBs\">2023 SCC OnLine MP 797<\/a>, order dated 17-03-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Sujoy Paul<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Prabhanshu Shukla, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\"> Madhya Pradesh High Court held that no document needs to be provided for registering an application under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act, when the same is not a condition precedent required under the said Section.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":286659,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12141,12801,7201,11421,52182,56259],"class_list":["post-287738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226","tag-debt-recovery-tribunal","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-sarfaesi-act","tag-section-17","tag-tata-motors-finance"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd. | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of Sujoy Paul*\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of Sujoy Paul*\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-25T06:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-03T10:14:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd. | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-25T06:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-03T10:14:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of Sujoy Paul*\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd. | SCC Times","description":"While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of Sujoy Paul*","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd.","og_description":"While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of Sujoy Paul*","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-03-25T06:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-04-03T10:14:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd. | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png","datePublished":"2023-03-25T06:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-03T10:14:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"While deciding a matter related to repossession of vehicle without following the SARFAESI Act, a Division bench compromising of Sujoy Paul*","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","url_meta":{"origin":287738,"position":0},"title":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002, a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Atul Sreedharan, J. allowed a writ appeal and set aside the Orders of the learned Single Judge as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":196227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":287738,"position":1},"title":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt","author":"Saba","date":"May 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 was dismissed by a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. Argument of the petitioner was that earlier, the concerned Bank initiated proceedings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/24\/whether-housing-finance-company-recover-loan-amount-less-than-%e2%82%b920-lakh-under-sarfaesi-act-mp-high-court-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":287738,"position":2},"title":"Whether Housing Finance Company can recover loan amount of less than \u20b920 lakh under SARFAESI Act? MP High Court answers","author":"Ritu","date":"May 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"MP High Court held that the writ petition is maintainable due to the pure legal questions involved regarding the applicability of SARFAESI Act provisions to HFCs for amounts below the Rs. 20 Lakhs threshold.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/20\/civil-court-cannot-have-jurisdiction-in-matters-covered-under-sarfaesi-act-2002-just-because-fraud-is-alleged\/","url_meta":{"origin":287738,"position":3},"title":"Civil Court cannot have jurisdiction in matters covered under SARFAESI Act, 2002 just because fraud is alleged","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In this case, two revision petitions were disposed of together by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kshetarpal, J., where issues were identical. This revision petition was filed against an order where application for rejection of plaint was dismissed. The Plaintiffs were alleged with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":193937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/12\/tenants-right-approach-drt-s-174-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":287738,"position":4},"title":"Tenants have a right to approach DRT under S. 17(4-A) of SARFAESI Act","author":"Saba","date":"March 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari, J., decided a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, wherein a stay was granted on the possession notice issued by the respondent Bank to the petitioner, directing the petitioners to approach the Debt Recovery\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":287738,"position":5},"title":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of appeal. Petitioner had\u00a0 filed Writ Petition challenging impugned order which was an interlocutory order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287738"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287738\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/286659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=287738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=287738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}